On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
If you read the rest of the post I mention it (without telling the name
:). The problem with this module is that it's useful only after you have
the core file. which is not good, because (as I've already explained):
it's important to mention
Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
If you read the rest of the post I mention it (without telling the name
:). The problem with this module is that it's useful only after you have
the core file. which is not good, because (as I've already explained):
it's
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
You can get a backtrace if you run the process under debugger without
dumping a core file. No special setup required. I was thinking to attach
the debugger on SIGSEGV event. Is it too late? I see certain gnome apps
failing and they ask you if you
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 02:09:44AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
If you read the rest of the post I mention it (without telling the name
:). The problem with this module is that it's useful only after you have
the core file.
