We are noticing missing graphic icons when displayed
on some IE 5 browsers (Mac and Windows) on a https SSL link.
(mod_ssl 2.8.0 on Apache 1.3.17 on Linux)
The page shows up fine, but the graphics are missing?
On some browsers, they show up just fine...?
Any ideas? Anybody seen this as
Scenario # 1:
I get the problem on some workstations and not
others in the same office with slow dialup connections.
Scenario # 2:
64K ISDN line: on the iMac IE5 browser the problem is there. On the IE5.5
browser on Windows98 it works...
Problem child.
-Original Message-
From:
We are noticing missing graphic icons when displayed
on some IE 5 browsers (Mac and Windows) on a https SSL link.
(mod_ssl 2.8.0 on Apache 1.3.17 on Linux)
The page shows up fine, but the graphics are missing?
On some browsers, they show up just fine...?
Any ideas? Anybody seen this as
respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From "
e: Missing Graphics?
See my previous message about keep alives.
Jeff
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Chong, Arthur wrote:
We are noticing missing graphic icons when displayed
on some IE 5 browsers (Mac and Windows) on a https SSL link.
(mod_ssl 2.8.0 on Apache 1.3.17 on Linux)
The page sho
Hey guys,
I don't think I'm missing it here - but I don't
think it's possible to do multiple virtual
named-based hosts on one web server with
SSL on multiple domains going after port 443.
As I understood it - the SSL layer was at
a lower level on the stack and all it
saw was the IP address.
I have not had the time to research more into the compile problem -
but this combo failed on compile:
openssl 0.9.6
apache1.3.19
mod_ssl 2.8.1
php 4.0.4pl1
on RH Linux 6.2
These are the latest and greatest from each group.
===
Stable, compiled
In our "experimentation" it helps that the secure vs non-secure
web pages start on an entirely different document root.
Same server alias, just different doc root.
Try that and please report your results...
Thanks,
-Arthur.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Kong [mailto:[EMAIL
Pardon my *stupidity* but when you say _default_:443
you really mean whatever the IP addresss is or
virtual domain name lime "www.mydomain.com" - right?
VirtualHost _default_:443
...
Directory /home/www/secure
SSLRequireSSL
...
/Directory
/VirtualHost
-Original
you handle different certificates for the different virtual
domains? Is that do-able too?
Thanks for the insight!
-Arthur.
-Original Message-
From: Brett W. McCoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 8:57 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: SSLRequireSSL
On Fr
Here is an example SSL section. It lists the Errorlog
- go there to see where the error is...so if your ServerRoot is /www,
the logs are at /www/logs
IfDefine SSL
VirtualHost _default_:443
#DocumentRoot /home/secure
#ServerName mooey.ee.com
#ServerAlias mooey.ee.com
ErrorLog
Can someone kindly tell me if I understand the documentation
correctly - I'm reading from the How-to secure a web server (RedHat)
and it says that you cannot have multiple virtual hosts off port 443.
Virtual host configured with a different port seems to be the
only solution - but that's not
Per my earlier post, if this directive works,
I suppose folks are building one secure server
with secure directories that are in
the virtual hosted server areas.would that be a
good way to go about it?
i.e. one secure web server off port 443, multiple
virtual hosts, but with secure
Really interested in this - we're trying to build the
same environment. So far no joywe've got oracle
and mysql in the mix as well...
Any input greatly appreciated!
-Arthur.
-Original Message-
From: Malay Shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 8:17 AM
Hello!
In the process of building a secure website - is there
a way to not purchase a Certificate from a CA
like Verisign - and still have a reasonable amount
of "authenticity" of your public certificates?
Is there a (free?) cheaper version of Verisign's
certificate out there?
The way I
Would be very interested to know what you find out.
We have the same environment installed - just last night in fact!
Please share your findings with the group.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Michael Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 9:19 AM
To:
16 matches
Mail list logo