ot;admin.domain."
"I would also redirect the web pages of a software running on localhost:3000
(on the server) to https://admin.server/ntop/";
Read up on the use of the mod_rewrite module:
For Apache 1.3 => http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/mod/mod_rewrite.html
For Apache 2 =&g
wight Victor, CISSP (Contractor)
DISA-PAC EMSS Gateway Hawaii
EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TEL: (808) 653-3677 ext 229
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Arsen Hayrapetyan
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 2:26 AM
To: modssl-users@modssl.org
Su
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Thank you François!
---
Dwight Victor, CISSP (Contractor)
TEL: (808) 653-3677 ext 229
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 10:14 PM
To: modssl-users@modssl.org
Subject: Re
been reading a bit about mod_nss
(http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Mod_nss). This module sounds
interesting, but it isn't supported on HP-UX. I'll have to give it a try
and I'll let the list know the results (if I can find some time to play with
it).
Thanks again,
D
be appreciated.
Best Regards,
Dwight...
---
Dwight Victor, CISSP (Contractor)
Systems Administrator / Webmaster
General Dynamics C4 Systems
EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TEL: (808) 653-3677 ext 229
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic
Hi Rob,
I also work for the DoD and am using the same CRLs as you (downloaded and
converted on a daily basis). We're running a Linux webserver with a single
1.8Ghz Celeron, 512MB of RAM, and 1GB of swap.
I haven't noticed any memory issues when checking CRLs.
My Apache server starts multiple ch
Hi Phil,
As far as I know, nothing that Rob mentioned is classified...especially
since he is not naming systems by name or address. The fact that the DoD
uses certificates is no secret...there's been many writeups in the various
trade magazines regarding the DoD's push to PKI.
Dwight...
-Or
!
__
Victor Medina M - Route Learning Web Designer and Senior Java Programmer
Real Business Solutions, Inc.
phone: 58245-5646677 EXT: 269
cellphone: 0416-8494395
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://unitec.edu.ve
usuario linux: #145671
__
forge project but haven't upload the latest release. (sourceforge.net/projects/ikirux)
The latest binary are here:
ftp://route.unitec.edu.ve/VictorMedina/IkiruxProject/
FileNamer: IKIRUX_WSP_Pro1Beta4_ENG.zip
Victor Medina
PS: I would really apreaciate some feedback on this, bugs, etc
Title: RE: Windows binaries for Apache
Hi guys!
I did mor or less the same, but I added and installer, my copy comes with the apache 2.0.40, openssl0.9.6g, php 4.2.3 and mysql 4
The installer can preconfigure everything
Now you guys two distintc setups one with apache 1.3 (provided by hunt
Most probably you haven´t add path to the ssl dll´s or lib inside VS, go to
tools\configure\directories and add the path to the include and bin folders
of your OpenSSL installation this should work just fine
Best Regards
Victor Medina
Universidad Tecnologica del Centro
Valencia-Venezuela
Hi there!
I can provide Apache binaries with mod_ssl included and zlib (dll's and
lib) with no problems, just contact me via my private mail to tell you
where to download it, if you haven't done taht yet from any member of the list
Victor Medina
At 12:39 PM 6/9/2002 +1200, you wro
Thanks for your help.
I will look in the archives (should've done this before though).
Victor
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [
Hi, I wanted to find out, if the MM lib is optional for Mod-SSL, what
exactly does it add? Is Mod-SSL with MM more stable then the one without
it? Faster?
What is the -DEAPI switch. I've compiled Apache with MM and Mod-SSL and
now I get a warning that mod_jserv should be recompiled with -DEAPI
sw
n the cron (if you are on unix). On windows, I am not
sure if there is a cron equivalent, but There are scheduling services, so you
might be able to use them to do a graceful restart of apache every 3 or 6
hours (or however often you need to refresh the list).
HTH
Victor
Dag Legernæs wrote:
> H
of the VirtualHost is set and that it is set to allow
from all.
HTH
Victor
"Pieter.Donche" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I set up mod_ssl-2.6.6-1.3.12 for Apache 1.2.12 on Sun/Solaris2.6 (with
> built-in PHP4.0 and ApacheJServ-1.1.2), made a self-signed certificate
> (make certificate
Was this issue fixed/addressed?
David Rees wrote:
> Ralf,
>
> We've found a pretty significant bug in the mod_ssl 2.6.5, and I've created
> a patch for it. This is affecting quite a large number of users (anyone who
> builds mod_ssl statically and trys to do a restart or graceful).
>
> Please c
ris 2.7 (Apache 1.3.12 + PHP 4.0.1pl2 + ModSSL 2.6.5). I
don't think I have the mm lib installed, but I don't use any DSO modules,
so it should not matter as I understand it.
Victor
Mads Toftum wrote:
> Could you just check one more thing for me - what exatly gets into the
> error l
r the backtrace I posted, but it
didn't seem very helpful to anyone. I can generate it again (probably).
Well, I am going to try truss again and see if it will accept the SIGHUP
Thanks for the help
Victor
__
How can you truss the running apache instance? I am having the same issue
(apache dumps core and crashes on restarts when compiled with Mod-SSL)
Did anyone find any solution or cause for this behavior? I posted my backtrace,
but noone was able to suggest anything to me. Just curious if there was
Sorry, disregard that. I thought I was in the Apache-SSL forum. I don't think
Mod-SSL requires these directives. Never mind.
Victor wrote:
> Check to make sure that the global SSL setup has these directives
>
> SSLVerifyClient 0
> SSLVerifyDepth 10
>
> Also make
Check to make sure that the global SSL setup has these directives
SSLVerifyClient 0
SSLVerifyDepth 10
Also make sure that you can ping www.verisign.com.
HTH,
Victor
Myint Myint Moe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed verisign certificate on our web server by using two
> dir
I am not sure, but most probably you don't have enough random info. What
you need to do is make sure you run this command from you home directory
(or directory to which you have read/write perms because the command
generates .rnd file which holds some random information).
/path-to-openssl-binary/
lso added
> that when recompiling and I no longer have the restart coredump.
> Dana
>
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Victor wrote:
> > Well, anyone have any clue as to why this crashing might occur? Here is
> > the backtrace again, just in case you didn't see it (I kind of messed
argv=0xffbefb5c) at http_main.c:5092
(gdb)
What is SSL_CTX_ctrl() ? Can some of the settings influence that function?
Any help appreciated
> - -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Victor
> Sent: July 18, 2000 3:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL
Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Victor
> Sent: July 18, 2000 3:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Problem with Apache
>
> I have apache 1.3.12 + PHP 4.0.1pl2 + JServ 1.1.2 + ModSSL (latest).
> When I start apache, it runs
:298
#3 0x152350 in ap_init_modules (p=0x2ca1d0, s=0x2ca1f8) at http_config.c:1568
#4 0x1607d4 in standalone_main (argc=4, argv=0xffbefa94) at http_main.c:4719
#5 0x161508 in main (argc=4, argv=0xffbefa94) at http_main.c:5092
(gdb)
Victor wrote:
> Craig Skelton wrote:
>
> > -BEGI
ine doing wierd stuff.
>
> Cheers,
> Craig Skelton
> /*
> ___ _
> ( \ (_) | |
> ) ) _ _ | | ___ ___
> | __ ( / ___) |/ || |/ _ |/ _ )/___)/ ___) _ \|\
> | |__) ) | | ( (_| ( ( | ( (/ /|___ ( (__| |_| | | | |
> |__/|_| |_|\|\_|| |\|___(_))___/|_|_|_|
> (_|
>
> */
>
> - -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:
I have apache 1.3.12 + PHP 4.0.1pl2 + JServ 1.1.2 + ModSSL (latest).
When I start apache, it runs fine, but when I restart it (-HUP), it
dumps core and quits. Any ideas ?
Thanks
Any suggestions welcome
__
Apache Interface to Ope
If some user authenticates by a key, using a simple script like the
classical printenv in apache, i can see its name in the environment
variable SSL_CLIENT_S_DN_CN.
The problem is that using php, this variable is not set.
How can i know the name of the user that authenticated itself by a ssl
key,
First question:
Is there any logical reason to reboot every week? If you are speaking a
real, production-environment server, it is stupid to do such a thing.. It
should have months or years of uptime..
The only excuse for a reboot can be:
- hardware upgrade / failure
- operating system upgrade /
After installing the mod_ssl package, i got the following problem:
certificates that i created are accepted without any problem by the
Netscape Navigator, but not by MSIE.
I am creating the keys with the following script (which is a combination
of lines from the F.A.Q and cca.sh. I needed to use
1-Feb-00 13:11 you wrote:
> I saw some discussions about configuration of "lightweight"
> mod_proxy+mod_ssl server and mod_perl server.
> But, sorry, I can't call mod_proxy+mod_ssl "light" server. Mod_ssl adds a 1
> Meg to size of process.
Who cares ? 1MiB or 20MiBs - no matter. It's just shared
3-Aug-99 23:15 you wrote:
>> Either your gzip is broken or (what I think is more true) you downloaded
>> incorrectly. Perhaps via FTP but without Binary mode or via HTTP and your
> If you downloaded via http/netscape, try rename the file to {file}.gz
> and then gunzip it ... My netscape messes t
3-Aug-99 22:37 you wrote:
> "Holdich, Kristian" wrote:
>>
>> why don't you build a 1.3.6 apache with mod_ssl and mod_proxy / mod_rewrite,
>> run it on port 80 and proxy the connection to the old version of apache?
>> This works nicely for us.
>>
>> Kristian
> how's the speed with this setup? i fo
30-Jul-99 18:29 you wrote:
> First, I apologize if this is a FAQ, I did a search on the archive
> but didn't find anything useful.
> Here's my setup:
> RedHat 6.0 with all updates
> apache-1.3.6-7 rpm
> I've downloaded and compiled openssl-0.9.3a
> I've also downloaded modssl-2.3.10-1.3.6
>
28-Jul-99 13:14 you wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 1999, Simon Weijgers wrote:
>> I can't seem to find a configure option to enable ipc semaphore support
>> in modssl. Does this mean it isn't stable yet?
>>From the user manual under "SSLMutex":
> (http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.3/ssl_reference.html)
>
23-Jul-99 09:03 you wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
> it's me again. I don't understand the use of ap_hook_use and how it would
> solve my problem. In my modules "URI to filename translation" phase I'd like
> to call the ssl's module handler "ssl_hook_fixup" which is setting up all
> SSL variables so the would
23-Jul-99 09:31 you wrote:
> Full_Name: Laurent FAILLIE
> Version: mod_ssl-2.3.6-1.3.6
> OS: HP-UX 10.20
> Submission from: gk-fr2.michelin.com (195.115.130.37)
> When I try to compile mod_ssl-2.3.6-1.3.6 on my HP-UX 10.20 box,
> the compilation fail because some files (like ssl_expr_yy) needs f
22-Jul-99 13:04 you wrote:
> I've been searching for some source of information about this...
> I would like to be able to use OpenSSL + mod_ssl + Apache in order to
> produce a secure web server; for a variety of reasons it would be very
> nice if I could have one httpd serving both http and htt
22-Jul-99 20:35 you wrote:
> Full_Name: Marco Teunissen van Manen
> Version: 2.3.6
> OS: Linux (Slackware 3.5)
> Submission from: n16152.telekabel.nl (212.142.16.152)
> After configuring and setting up mod_ssl for module use with apache 1.3.6,
> I got a message stating that an error was detected
22-Jul-99 16:41 you wrote:
> Hi,
> I just want to ask whether we can secure apache web server on NT using
> mod-ssl and openssl. Are the installations steps given fr win32 applicable
> for NT also. If not can any one give me the outline of the steps or any
> website from where i can follow the st
19-Jul-99 08:57 you wrote:
> Hi, answering my own question.. had thought that mod_ssl would would use my
> already intalled apache but found I needed to dl and unpack a fresh copy
> for mod_ssl to work with.
> Now can't find the source tree for OpenSSl, even though the entire
> directory in right
19-Jul-99 20:52 you wrote:
> well my configuration:
> linux-2.2.10
> pgcc-1.1.3-3mdk
> openssl-0.9.3a-3
> Perl 5.005.03
> What I see:
===>> src/modules/ssl
> gcc -c -I../../os/unix -I../../include -DLINUX=2 -DMOD_SSL=203106
> -DUSE_HSREGEX -DEAPI `../../apaci` -DSSL_COMPAT -I
16-Jul-99 08:17 you wrote:
> Holger Reif wrote:
>>
>> Has the ssl_enginge_log told you that all servers have been configured
>> already? Are you perhaps using /dev/random and temp key generation is
>> somehow slowly?
> YES! THAT WAS IT!!!
> I really thank you for pointing me to this! But why did
16-Jul-99 11:23 you wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 1999, Jens Leuschner wrote:
>> > Has the ssl_enginge_log told you that all servers have been configured
>> > already? Are you perhaps using /dev/random and temp key generation is
>> > somehow slowly?
>>
>> YES! THAT WAS IT!!!
>> I really thank you for
14-Jul-99 15:31 you wrote:
> Le Wed, 14 Jul 1999, vous avez écrit :
>> On Wed, Jul 14, 1999, Nick wrote:
>>
>> > Hi every body
>> > I'm new to this list. and to SSL
>> > I have probleme starting apache
>> > -
>> > the probleme is:
>> > [root@xover conf]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd start
>>
14-Jul-99 17:55 you wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> We're running Debian Linux (kernel 2.2.7, glibc 2.1), apache 1.3.6 & mod_ssl
>> 2.3.5.
>>
>> Unless we manually chown the ssl_scache.dir and ssl_scache.pag files, we
>> get:
>>
>> Can't open SSLSessionCache DBM file fo
12-Jul-99 11:30 you wrote:
> So what (besides using shared memory) is the solution for other distros
> using Glibc 2.1 and building mod_ssl from source?
In fact mod_ssl will work with GLibC 2.1: since the only thing from
used in ndbm.h is definition of type "DB" and the only way this type is
use
12-Jul-99 15:36 you wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 1999, Jeffrey Burgoyne wrote:
>> Any idea of what performance gain to expect? We get about 15000 real hits
>> a day, about 6 total (including graphics). About 10% of those are SSL.
>> I need to justify why we want to make the change to the web serv
12-Jul-99 19:25 you wrote:
> Hi, I've already installed modssl with tar.gz package, but,
> some others modules cause problemes. Now, I have to install
> mod_ssl on a rpm_based apache.
It's not possible. End of story.
> I can't uninstall everything and redo all from the beginning.
> I must instal
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jeffrey Burgoyne
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
JB> On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Khimenko Victor wrote:
>> 12-Jul-99 08:13 you wrote:
>>
>> > After experienceing some "brownouts" in Stronghold SSL, I changed our web
>> > serv
12-Jul-99 08:13 you wrote:
> After experienceing some "brownouts" in Stronghold SSL, I changed our web
> server to modssl last week. We saw a huge increase in performance (of
> course, the brownouts really dragged down the stats I expect) in the range
> of 50 to 80 percent.
> Since our site is a
11-Jul-99 22:51 you wrote:
> Dear List Members,
> We have successfully installed Apache 1.3.6 with openssl 0.9.3a, and mod_ssl
> 2.3.3-1.3.6. We are using a httpd.conf file little changed from the one
> created by the installation. Having experimented, read the mail list archives,
> and read th
9-Jul-99 14:03 you wrote:
> I sent this out with no response. Can some one comment?
> Am looking for some Perl CGI script that can proccess Netscape and
> Microsoft Clients Certificate Request Automatiquely for mod_ssl-2.3.5
> + openssl_0_9_3a. The scrript must completely automate the process,
>
9-Jul-99 16:06 you wrote:
> There was a discussion about DBM extension/permission under
> GLIBC 2.1 some times ago.
In fact even attached patch is not correct :-/ Since you can not just
"#include " and be happy ... will include
instead of so some defines still will be screwed up
unless you are
8-Jul-99 13:32 you wrote:
> I'm trying to compile mod_ssl 2.3.5 for Apache 1.3.6 on AIX 4.3 but get
> stuck at the following:
> flex -Pssl_expr_yy -s -B ssl_expr_scan.l
> make: flex: Command not found
> make: *** [ssl_expr_scan.c] Error 127
> I didn't notice flex being a prerequisite in the INSTA
8-Jul-99 15:20 you wrote:
> call this a stupid question:
> i have installed apache 1.3.6 with mod_ssl 2.3.5 and i am using OpenSSL
> 0.9.3a.
> i am unclear of how to have a different certificate for each virtual
> domain. i am able to assign a certificate, but that certificate is the
> same for
8-Jul-99 09:40 you wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been playing around with mod-ssl. I wonder about the following
> entries in the general error.log:
> [Thu Jul 8 09:12:05 1999] [error] mod_ssl: Cannot open SSLSessionCache
> DBM file `/var/run/ssl.dbm' for writing (store) (System error follows)
> [Thu
6-Jul-99 13:10 you wrote:
> Well I have tried just about everything. I am now just trying to get Apache
> 1.3.6, mod_ssl 2.3.5, and OpenSSL working. Basically it seems to work
> somewhat during the first request by returning some or sometimes all the
> data requested by the browser. I have trie
5-Jul-99 10:20 you wrote:
> Hello!
> I want to install the module for the "Sercure Socket Layer". I have an
> apache www-server and i want to install a module. The php3 module was easy
> to install as an module. But the module for ssl is realy hard.
Yes, it should be :-)) Blame US goverment, not
5-Jul-99 13:28 you wrote:
> I built apache_1.3.6/mod_perl-1.20/mod_ssl-2.3.5-1.3.6/openssl-0.9.3a
> for Solaris 2.5.1.
> When I start the server without -DSSL, any children serving location
> /server-status, configured with
> ExtendedStatus On
>
> SetHandler server-status
> Order deny,a
1-Jul-99 15:14 you wrote:
> Hi,
> how do people build SSL systems which do not require the client to
> accept certificates? E.g. if you want to order a book at www.amazon.de
> and you are using the SSL connection, users do not have to accept the
> certificates, although the certificate of the web
1-Jul-99 12:28 you wrote:
> May I politely point out that Win2K is _BETA_.
> If something's b0rken, go back to a known, stable platform.
And then you'll stuck at the same step 6 :-)) No, beta status of W2K is not as
issue here...
> -dsp
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[
30-Jun-99 16:50 you wrote:
> hi,all:
> when I do "apachectl startssl" , it would ask me password, I think it will
> be not convenient , anyway to pass this?
Huh. Read message there :-) You have some keys encrypted. Just use unencrypted
ones (make certificate usually asks you if you want encrypte
tion "Run-time configuration directives".
> sincerely
> sun
> ------
> From: Khimenko Victor[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 1999 2:23 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject
29-Jun-99 12:15 you wrote:
> I'm having a bit of problem with the authentication in changing over from
> Stronghold to mod_ssl. In my new conf file I have added :
>
> AuthType Basic
> AuthName Strategis
> AuthDBMUserFile /rz6c/stronghold/pw/level1
> require valid-user
>
> which mod_ssl doesn
30-May-99 23:31 you wrote:
> I have installed the latest OpenSSL and ModSSL for Apache package.
> The system works as for passing the security Certificate. When I then
> go to view a secure Web page by typing the URL again with the https
> directive I get a Secure Library error.
> The error sta
11-Mar-99 14:06 you wrote:
> Sorry, but it's really nasty when people don't want to _READ_!
> The gid-mkcert.sh script looks like:
> | :
> | ## ssleay ... get it from ftp://ftp.psy.uq.oz.au/pub/Crypto/SSL/
> | ## ca-fix ... get it from http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk/ca-fix.html
> |
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User Rick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> 2-Mar-99 10:28 you wrote:
>> > A note about php. If you choose to integrate database access for example to
>> > mysql in the php install, then mysqld must be running for apache to start.
>> > This is not very nice and means you must i
2-Mar-99 10:28 you wrote:
> A note about php. If you choose to integrate database access for example to
> mysql in the php install, then mysqld must be running for apache to start.
> This is not very nice and means you must insure that upon a restart or cold
> start that the database daemon is up
2-Mar-99 06:14 you wrote:
>>This seems like a popular combination, perhaps it would be worth someone
>>doing up an rpm combining these particular modules (but might be a lot of work
>>keeping a package with all the latest versions after each upgrade).
> That sounds like it'd be a nightmare for wh
8-Feb-99 12:31 you wrote:
> Khimenko Victor wrote:
>>
>> If you use libc5-based Linux then try to use built-in SDBM !
>> At least Slackware 3.6 has broken DBM :-((
> Uh oh. Yeah, definately a problem here. Slack 3.6 it is. Excuse me for
> not knowing exactly what a &
8-Feb-99 10:57 you wrote:
> Linux 2.0.36
> SSLeay-0.9.0b
> apache_1.3.4
> mod_ssl-2.2.2-1.3.4
> rsaref-2.0
> Anything else needed?
Libc version :-)) I'm seen reports about hangs with my RPMs on libc5-based
systems (recompiled, of course :-) but could not reproduce it with RedHat 5.2
or KSI-Linu
4-Feb-99 04:24 you wrote:
> On 04-Feb-99 Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 03, 1999, Philp Gwyn wrote:
>>
>>> How does one find what version of mod_ssl is compiled into a given
>>> httpsd? httpsd -v tells me the apache version, but not the
>>> mod_ssl
>>> version.
>>
>> Hmmm... yes, that
3-Feb-99 16:56 you wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 1999, Ronan-Yann Lorin wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be nice to have EAPI and mod_ssl available as two distincts
>> distribs ? So we know when EAPI has been changed and we must rebuild apache
>> binary, or when mod_ssl has been changed and we must rebuild mod_
31-Jan-99 00:33 you wrote:
> Full_Name: Mario Medina
> Version: 2.2.0-1.3.4
> OS: Linux 2.0.36 (slackware 3.6.0) ELF
> Submission from: teccasa21.ccm.itesm.mx (148.241.166.21)
> I compile and install all the files ok, i can access to a non-ssl page, but
> when i try to acces to a https://machine
25-Jan-99 15:02 you wrote:
>> I just uploaded a version of apache-mod_ssl-1.3.4-2.1.8
>> to ftp://ftp.replay.com/pub/replay/incoming/
>> The directory layout is a hybrid between Apache and RedHat...
>>
> [GOMEZ Henri] Re-Hi, seems you like both mod_ssl and apache ssl
> products. :-)
>
24-Jan-99 16:13 you wrote:
> Hello Ashley,
>> has anyone been able to get mod_coldfusion (from allaire.com)
>> and apache 1.3 and mod_ssl work together? As far as I can tell
>> problems are caused by both SSLeay and mod_coldfusion having
>> identical symbols in it ...
>>
>> Any suggestions as how
15-Jan-99 18:35 you wrote:
> We've already recognized that on some not-such-smart platforms Apache+mod_ssl
> can dump core under the DSO situation. I've already traced it down and the
> problem has to do with the fact that Apache _reloads_ the DSOs at startup-time
> and that some dangling referen
4-Jan-99 17:20 you wrote:
> Thanks for your reply,
> I'll then get the sources for apache 1.3.3 ;-)
> But have to disagree with you about the solution you gave for the SSL_BASE
> variable. Here is the problem:
> (first, I wiped the test for the EAPI flag, otherwise, I cannot get further
> ;-)
4-Jan-99 15:33 you wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm trying to isntall mod_ssl on my Debian Linux box, but I couldn't,
> there are too many problems with debian packages:
> I'm using (trying to ;-) mod_ssl-2.1.5_1.3.3.tar.gz, and the
> apache_1.3.3-3, apache-dev, and apache-common debian packages.
You coul
2-Jan-99 16:59 you wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 1999, Achille M. Luongo wrote:
>> I would like to compile or simply use a mod_ssl module under Linux
>> (kernel 2.0.36) as a stand-alone DSO module for an apache 1.3.3 binary
>>
>> RPM package, but I didn't find istructions.
>> Can anyone suggest me how
2-Jan-99 15:59 you wrote:
> Hi!
> I would like to compile or simply use a mod_ssl module under Linux
> (kernel 2.0.36) as a stand-alone DSO module for an apache 1.3.3 binary
> RPM package, but I didn't find istructions.
Just since such instrictions could not be written at all :-)
> Can anyone s
29-Dec-98 00:15 you wrote:
> Full_Name: Christian Buysschaert
> Version: 2.1.4-1.3.3
> OS: NT
> Submission from: eagle.tvd.be (195.162.196.13)
> I believe I followed the instruction correctly but I am unable
> to compile Apache, more specifically ApacheModuleSSL.dll.
> The error indicate he cou
12-Dec-98 10:16 you wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 1998, Bruce B. Platt wrote:
>> I have a port 80, non-SSL site created for my family which has user
>> authentication configured as follows in access.conf:
>>
>> AuthName "Restricted Access"
>> AuthType Basic
>> AuthUserFile /usr/local/apache/etc/athori
3-Dec-98 19:19 you wrote:
> Ops, seems like I was too slow or you too fast. Last weekend I've added full
> APXS support to the distribution. I think this would make your life easier.
> When you're interesting you can test my APXS support. I've still not comitted
> it for mod_ssl 2.1.x because it's
17-Nov-98 13:47 you wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 1998, Khimenko Victor wrote:
>> 17-Nov-98 11:37 you wrote:
>> >> 2) in Makefile.nt you invoke mod_ssl's makefile with
>> >>
>> >> nmake /nologo CFG="mod_ssl - Win32 %LONG%" -f Makefile
>&g
17-Nov-98 11:37 you wrote:
>> 2) in Makefile.nt you invoke mod_ssl's makefile with
>>
>> nmake /nologo CFG="mod_ssl - Win32 %LONG%" -f Makefile
>> nmake /nologo CFG="mod_ssl - Win32 %LONG%" -f Makefile clean
>> ...
>>
>> The define CFG="mod_ssl - Win32 %LONG%" has nothing to do here. The
>> other
14-Nov-98 15:01 you wrote:
> The last days I spent a lot of time to create the new User Manual for the
> forthcoming 2.1.0 release. The current state is that all chapters except for
> Chapter 4 (Compatibility) are now finished (at least IMHO ;-). So you now can
> have a preview under
> http://
Changes from patch4: return types and declined values support (API changed)
Changes from patch5: use of 'inline' for C++ (API not changed)
SYNOPSIS
Main Setup:
void ap_hook_init (void);
void ap_hook_kill (void);
Hook Configuration and Registration:
ap_hook_define_client(h
/*
* SYNOPSIS
*
*Main Setup:
* void ap_hook_init (void);
* void ap_hook_kill (void);
*
*Hook Configuration and Registration:
* ap_hook_define_client(hook_name,hook_parameters,hook_call);
* int ap_hook_configure_hook_name(ap_hook_mode modeid);
* int ap_
12-Nov-98 08:48 you wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 1998 at 12:52:10AM +0300, Khimenko Victor wrote:
>> No more hacks in mod_so. Instead all modules unregister hooks before unload.
>> Also some slightly non portable defines (still ANSI compliant AFAIK) moved
>> in few separ
No more hacks in mod_so. Instead all modules unregister hooks before unload.
Also some slightly non portable defines (still ANSI compliant AFAIK) moved
in few separate defines in top of ap_hook.h and new ap_hook_define_global/
ap_hook_define_realize to make hooks more usable in multifiles client m
On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, Martin Kraemer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 1998 at 08:03:54PM +0300, Khimenko Victor wrote:
> > May be while Ralf is busy with documentation things someone could take a look
> > on subj. This is just "working demo", but it's working enough to be
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
r> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ralf S. Engelschall
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
RE>> Hello mod_ssl hackers,
RE>> I've prepared the new mod_ssl distribution layout (actually I wrote new
RE>> programs which generate it for me ;_), inco
8-Nov-98 12:03 you wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 1998, Khimenko Victor wrote:
>> EAPI = bloatware ? Of I'm just confused ...
> Not intentionally bloatware, of course. More the result of trying to
> combine three major requirements: portability (full ANSI C compliant),
> fu
EAPI = bloatware ? Of I'm just confused ...
After look on EAPI I'm could not understood why it's designed to be so bloat
and slow. Why other (MUCH more simpler) design is unacceptable:
#define hook_define(hook_name,hook_signature,hook_params)\
extern struct hook_struct_##hook_name {
On Wed, 4 Nov 1998, James wrote:
> > Weird. I'm ready to got such question from dumb Winblows user but from
> > Linux user... Unbeliveable :-((
>
> I'm sorry you misunderstood. That was not a question so much as a
> rhetorical question, a comment on the Navigator user interface.
>
Oops.
> >
3-Nov-98 09:37 you wrote:
> So far mod_ssl can only be built with apache sources. I've tanken a look at
> mod_php3 and it can be built without the apache sources (just the header
> files).
Yes, but mod_php3 is HORRIBLE here. Right sample would be mod_perl 1.15 or
1.17 (mod_php3 does not use option
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
