** Reply to note from "J. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 21 Dec 2001 01:22:34 -0800 (PST)
>
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Simon Ritchie wrote:
>
> > I don't think you have to go that far.
>
> No, but the computer does the work, and scrubbing and replacing the
> entire distribution takes
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Simon Ritchie wrote:
> I don't think you have to go that far.
No, but the computer does the work, and scrubbing and replacing the entire
distribution takes much less time than trying to find a faster solution.
=== JJ
08:39
> To: David Wright
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: DSO problems
>
>
> Doesn't that error have the feel of a makefile error?
>
> How about an experiment? Do a 'find ... -ls' on all of your Configure and
> make files, and check their modification
Okay, thanks for the help. I gave up and decided to do the APACI thing
instead. Worked beautifully.
-Original Message-
From: J. Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:39 AM
To: David Wright
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DSO problems
Doesn't
Doesn't that error have the feel of a makefile error?
How about an experiment? Do a 'find ... -ls' on all of your Configure and
make files, and check their modification dates. Better yet, make a
radical change in your Apache configuration (like a different compiler),
and see if it gets reflecte
Sorry for such a stupid question... I'm trying to build libssl.so on RH7,
using the brute force method. I've successfully built several other DSO's,
so I know that my OS supports it.
Here's what I'm doing:
$ cd openssl-0.9.6b/
$ sh config -fPIC
$ make
$ make test
