On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 08:47:02AM -0400, Barry, Richard wrote:
> This may sound a little strange at first, but I'm looking for feedback from
> the experienced modssl-users readership on how people view the use of
> Apache/mod_ssl in a non-SSL configuration.
>
> My purpose for asking is that we a
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 10:59:43AM -0400, Barry, Richard wrote:
> (This is good feedback, thanks.)
>
> We don't build mod_ssl as a dynamically-loaded module, it's compiled in so
> the initialization hooks get called. (Export regulations dictated this at
> the time. These regulations are changing
tion.)
-Original Message-
From: Kirk Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 10:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Pros/Cons for using Apache with mod_ssl for non-SSL
operation
If the LoadModule dirrective is also commented out, mod_ssl will not be
loaded,
x27;[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Pros/Cons for using Apache with mod_ssl for non-SSL
> operation
>
>
> That's our preferred solution.
>
> Note that mod_ssl still insists that a server certificate exists which is
> used to generate temp RSA keys, so non-SSL users will n
Message-
From: Kirk Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Pros/Cons for using Apache with mod_ssl for non-SSL
operation
Why not option a) and just comment out th
ubject: Pros/Cons for using Apache with mod_ssl for non-SSL operation
>
>
> This may sound a little strange at first, but I'm looking for
> feedback from
> the experienced modssl-users readership on how people view the use of
> Apache/mod_ssl in a non-SSL configuration.
>
This may sound a little strange at first, but I'm looking for feedback from
the experienced modssl-users readership on how people view the use of
Apache/mod_ssl in a non-SSL configuration.
My purpose for asking is that we are porting Apache and mod_ssl and
packaging it for our customers. Most of
