Now I'm leaning toward Barcode::Decoder. Thanks, Smylers!
(It seems like object-oriented modules should have names that are nouns,
but I don't know how widespread that idea is in the module-writing
community.)
--
Keith C. Ivey
Washington, DC
Okay, it seems like Barcode is the best namespace for it. As Bill says,
the module is essentially OCR for barcodes, so if there were a good
space for OCR-related modules it might fit there, but there doesn't seem
to be one.
I've thought about Barcode::Reader, but that could give people the id
I've written some code to recognize and read barcodes in images that I
want to clean up and release as a module. I haven't found any module
that duplicates the functionality.
The idea is that you give it an image (JPEG, PNG, or anything else
handled by GD) that contains a barcode and it retur
Jonathan Rockway wrote:
Uh, in en_US we say this too.
There are people in the US (and probably other places) for whom "I went
to the zoo this Sunday" is perfectly grammatical. Some might say "this
past Sunday" to distinguish it from "this coming Sunday", but the tense
of the verb is enough.
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
I'm still working on "when is this Sunday", which is going to be a bit
tricky. ISO 8601 defines the week starting on Monday ("this Sunday" is
always in the future) while the bible (and perl's localtime) claims it
as the first day ("this Sunday" is always in the past.) This
Johan Vromans wrote:
I'd say that January 30 + 1 month should be March 1, not February 29.
I might agree, but whichever alternative is chosen,
(January 30 + 1 month) + 1 month != January 30 + 2 months
I don't think there's a solution without making a month a fixed number
of days, which w
Ovid wrote:
Nope. Aristotle's right. I definitely meant Zawinsky. He runs the
DNA Lounge (http://www.dnalounge.com/). Their music seems awesome. If
I ever get to that part of the world, I might just drop in.
(Zawodny works for Yahoo!)
Yeah, "Zawodny" was a joke. But JWZ is still Zawinski
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-02 12:40]:
Jamie Zawicky
Zawinsky.
Zawinski, actually -- or is it Zawodny?
--
Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Washington, DC
Dr.Ruud wrote:
Keith Ivey schreef:
Dr.Ruud:
Greg Matheson:
A. Pagaltzis:
Write the same thing without syntactic sugar from constant.pm.
sub C1 () { 'C1' }
Mmh. I see constant.pm does very little.
Well, it nicely sets things up for the compiler to optimize.
perl -MO=
Dr.Ruud wrote:
Greg Matheson schreef:
A. Pagaltzis:
Write the same thing without syntactic sugar from constant.pm.
sub C1 () { 'C1' }
Mmh. I see constant.pm does very little.
Well, it nicely sets things up for the compiler to optimize.
perl -MO=Deparse -e 'use constant PI => 3.1
Randy Kobes wrote:
Perhaps, if nothing else, the terms of usage of the package:
http://search.cpan.org/src/BANTOWN/Time-Cubic-1.0/LICENSE
by which one *must* commit at least three violations of the named parts
of the US Criminal Code to use it, makes it
unsuitable for CPAN.
Hmm, SNMP::APCU
Tim Maher wrote:
I'm generally against the idea of censorship in all its forms, ...
Are you equally outraged by the fact that this list goes through a spam
filter? That "module" is just spam.
--
Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Washington, DC
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
Maybe ForceAXfer? I only have a superficial knowledge of the DNS
protocol, but I assume that the “A” refers to A records and the
“xfer” part is a separate word. Is that right? If so, treating
them as separate words would look better.
Since the opcode is AXFR (no "e"), should
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
If this is the case, then the cat to be skinned is a couple of steps to
the left, since an alias override is a different beast than a
config-file override (and not having any way to tell them apart isn't
going to help either.)
I don't see what makes them so different -- f
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
Ok. Here's one edge-case which probably involves somebody smart enough
to not get stuck in it. Is this really a good argument for perplexing
the user the other 99% of the time?
It seems to me that that situation is far more than 1%, more like 99%,
of the times *when bot
Should it go under Geo?
--
Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Washington, DC
David Nicol wrote:
or even a doc-patch for HTML::Entities. I think my political goal here is
fame points through getting Tie::Function into wider use.
What is the advantage of Tie::Function over MJD's similar Interpolation.pm?
--
Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Washington, DC
Chris Dolan wrote:
On Apr 6, 2005, at 11:06 AM, Reinhard Pagitsch wrote:
I would suggest now to name the module Win32::Storage::ReadSummaryInfo.
I like this better than before, but why not Win32::Document::SummaryInfo?
It seems to me that if the module deals with what Windows calls
"Properties",
18 matches
Mail list logo
