Re: Taking Over Maintenance of a CPAN Module

2004-04-20 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know that we've had a lot of discussion on this list about taking over > maintenance of apparently abandoned modules ... If you cannot reach the author, post to this or the perl modules list, and one of the PAUSE admin

Re: Application framework namespaces

2004-05-14 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael A Nachbaur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The thing is, these are free-standing applications, and for the most part > aren't developer tools. So, I was thinking an App:: namespace would work > well, (e.g.. App::WWW::NachoMusic, etc). I'd rather see top-lev

Re: getting rid of some unmaintained modules

2004-05-07 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sherzod Ruzmetov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Instead of removing any modules, edit the docs of the library stating the > modules are obsolete, unfinished, broken etc. If there are any other modules > that you know of to be used as an alternative, list them, but kee

Re: Application framework namespaces

2004-05-14 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mark Stosberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 03:17:50PM -0400, _brian_d_foy wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael A Nachbaur > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd rather see

Re: CGI::Uploader (was: CGI::FileManager)

2004-05-01 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Austin Schutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would be nice if there were some way to take over management of > the module from the current owner. If they aren't responsive, there ought > to be some mechanism for doing it without their input. if you need to take o

Re: fix bad upload?

2004-05-04 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tim Harsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I forgot to include Makefile.PL in my distribution. Would prefer to just > replace the offending upload, rather than up the version number and start > again. Would that be the best way? you can't upload a file of the same n

Re: Perlforge? (was: Re: CPAN Rating)

2004-06-23 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mark Stosberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One benefit I see of a extra "forges" like rubyforge is > decentralization. Right now open source has a huge dependency on > SourceForge. Indeed. SourceForge's services and uptimes have been slowly degrading, and lately

Re: Module name? CPAN::Distribution::Depends

2004-07-16 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Rothenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am working on a module that when given a CPAN distribution, it will > determine what modules that distribution depends on by scanning the META.yml > file or if that one is not present, the Makefile.PL file. This sh

Re: Module name: WWW-ISBNReference

2004-07-24 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Rothenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am working on a module that can query isbnreference.org for information > about a particular book. have you thought about working with Ed Summers to put that into Business::ISBN ? -- brian d foy, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Design philosophy (was Re: Module name: WWW-ISBNReference)

2004-07-30 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Rothenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/25/2004 2:26 AM brian d foy wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Robert Rothenberg wrote: > >> I don't think it's appropriate to merge with Business::ISBN, which > >> just deals with ISBN data. The isbnsearch system

Re: CAD::* namespace

2004-08-29 Thread _brian_d_foy
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]] In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got several modules under the CAD::* namespace, which I chose > because there was an existing module CAD::Pro

Re: cpan-testers rant

2004-09-17 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Coppit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can someone please tell me how to convince cpan-tester's automated testing > to: > - Not test unless required modules are installed. (Of *course* it fails if >you don't have a required module installed.) it would be ni

Re: MySQL::Backup?

2004-10-26 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Smylers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Dolan writes: > > > Assuming it is based on DBI at its core, your module would fit better > > in the DBI extension area. I think DBIx::Backup::MySQL would be good, > > as it would leave room for expansions to databases ot

Re: What to name a module that resolves transportation schedules

2004-11-02 Thread _brian_d_foy
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]] In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Rothenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have written some prototype Perl code that when given a set of bus routes > will give a list of bus times f

Re: CPAN question

2004-11-10 Thread _brian_d_foy
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]] In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sean Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My impulse is to regularly update the modules on CPAN, at least until we > get a semi-functional beta in place. But

Re: CPAN question

2004-11-11 Thread _brian_d_foy
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]] In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sean Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 19:35, _brian_d_foy wrote: > > You c

Re: CPAN Testers and PREREQ_PM doesn't work very well!!!!!!

2004-12-21 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Graciliano M. P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is not the 1st time that I receive a FAIL report from CPAN telling that is > not possible to find module X at @INC, saying to add the PREREQ_PM at > MakeFile.PL. > > Well, I always put the PREREQ_PM at MakeFile.PL. So,

Re: Including a 480K data file with a module

2005-01-05 Thread _brian_d_foy
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]] In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott W Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm working with T.J. Mather on updating Geo::PostalCode. One of the > things we're looking at is how to manage

Re: Including a 480K data file with a module

2005-01-05 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dana Hudes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Scott W Gifford wrote: > > > A private emailer wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > Even better isn't all this on a USPS server? Whatever tool you use > > > to grab their server database, include it and do tha

Re: Including a 480K data file with a module

2005-01-06 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott W Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why not just leave it uncompressed, and let the compression of the > whole package into Geo-PostalCode-US-0.1.tar.gz take care of > compressing it? I recommend not doing that. I had a lot of problems distributing the

Re: Module Name: Net::Lite::FTP

2005-01-07 Thread _brian_d_foy
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]] In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dariush Pietrzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bad name. That should be Net::FTP::Lite. > My code has nothing to do with Net::FTP, it's not a subclass or

Re: CPAN::Forum

2005-02-03 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce J Keeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 20:06 +, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > > I can't think of a future-proof way of avoiding IDs you allocate conflicting > > with PAUSE, unless you and Andreas collaborate > > CPAN IDs are always upper

Re: CPAN cruft cleanup?

2005-02-24 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christopher Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Johan Vromans wrote: > >>But from what I hear, I'm on my own -- > > Not completely. > > The cpancd[1] package has the functionality in it to find out the latest > > version of a series of versio

Re: Probing requirements (was: Re: Some ideas)

2005-04-08 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Randy W. Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Probe::OS - Gather info on the operating system > Probe::Libs > Probe::Progs > Probe::FileSys - maybe incorporate ideas Schwern posted on p5p recently, Perhaps we can put this under a namespace like Config:: ? I imagi

Re: Switching Maintenance of a CPAN Distribution

2005-07-04 Thread _brian_d_foy
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]] In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nicholas Clark wrote:> > > > > The existing maintainer needs to log into PAUSE, then select > > "Change Permiss

Re: Perl6 goes where?

2005-07-28 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Austin Schutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-27 21:50]: > > Is it a content management system that is built on perl 6, or > > is it a system for managing perl 6 content? The latter would > > imply cpan, the former something

Re: RFC - "Test::Stupid" module

2005-08-20 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Rothenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm rather annoyed by the spate of CPAN uploads which have defaults from > h2xs or Module::Install that are not edited, things like "Perl extension > for blah blah blah" or "A. U. Thor". In other words, stupid mistak

Re: RFC - "Test::Stupid" module

2005-08-22 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * _brian_d_foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-20 23:15]: > > When you want to add something (like a standard test file), you > > just add it to the sample dist. When you want to change some &g

Re: RFC - "Test::Stupid" module

2005-08-24 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * _brian_d_foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-22 20:00]: > Sure, but you and brian aren’t the kind of people who’d need h2xs > or module-starter or the like anyway. I find it kind of str

Re: Checking for boilerplate

2005-08-24 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Aug 22, 2005, at 2:07 PM, Andy Lester wrote: > > > RJBS and I are going to put some tests into Module::Starter to check > > for > > boilerplate. Watch for it tomorrow, maybe tonight. > Did people not like the idea of

Re: Checking for boilerplate

2005-08-24 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Nicol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > gotta put the checks in PAUSE so it rejects boilerplate-havin modules > -- anything > less won't work Absoultely not. Just because someone leaves in some boilerplate doesn't mean that we should stop them from sharing the cod

Re: Checking for boilerplate

2005-08-24 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 07:46:38AM -0500, Ken Williams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > Personally I still don't think that's the best place for it. Why make > > all the people who *download* your module check something tha