# from A. Pagaltzis
# on Friday 20 April 2007 10:34 am:
>As far as I’m concerned, `configure_requires` is the solution
>that should have been implemented IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Yep. That about says it all. That, and a client that checks for the
need to update whenever if fetches the module list.
* Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-20 18:30]:
> Module::Build's main attitude has always been to make things
> easier for authors at the expense of users, in part by
> implementing things that the rest of the tool-chain simply
> doesn't support.
And Module::Install makes things easy for u
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
# from Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni
# on Tuesday 17 April 2007 05:12 pm:
If you really want Module::Build to be installed, why not simply
create a traditional Makefile.PL and add Module::Build as a
prerequisite? That way your module can be installed with
ExtUtils::MakeMak
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:32:48 -0700, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> # from Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni
> # on Tuesday 17 April 2007 05:12 pm:
>> If you really want Module::Build to be installed, why not simply
>> create a traditional Makefile.PL and add Module::Build as a
On 4/17/07, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# from Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni
# on Tuesday 17 April 2007 05:12 pm:
>If you really want Module::Build to be installed, why not simply
>create a traditional Makefile.PL and add Module::Build as a
>prerequisite? That way your module can be ins
# from Andreas J. Koenig
# on Tuesday 17 April 2007 09:18 pm:
> > The solution really should not involve 'traditional'.
>
> > Furthermore, I already do declare a dependency on Module::Build in
> the > META.yml. It seems that this is ignored though. I understand
> Adam's > argument about platfo
On Apr 17, 2007, at 12:16 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
The suggestion people made was to have M::B produce a
'traditional'-style makefile as well. So at least M::B-deprived
systems might have a good go.
My problem with the create_makefile_pl => 'traditional' is that it
doesn't install Module::Build
# from Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni
# on Tuesday 17 April 2007 05:12 pm:
>If you really want Module::Build to be installed, why not simply
>create a traditional Makefile.PL and add Module::Build as a
>prerequisite? That way your module can be installed with
>ExtUtils::MakeMaker yet Module::Bui
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
The suggestion people made was to have M::B produce a
'traditional'-style makefile as well. So at least M::B-deprived
systems might have a good go.
My problem with the create_makefile_pl => 'traditional' is that it
doesn't install Module::Build, so we're not making any prog
# from A. Pagaltzis
# on Tuesday 17 April 2007 01:21 pm:
>> I've wondered about this - can you get a Makefile.PL to prereq
>> Module::Build so CPAN.pm installs it, then transfer control
>> over to M::B?
>
>If someone came up with a way to make this work reliably, the
>entire raison d’être for Modu
* Joshua ben Jore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-17 16:25]:
> I've wondered about this - can you get a Makefile.PL to prereq
> Module::Build so CPAN.pm installs it, then transfer control
> over to M::B?
If someone came up with a way to make this work reliably, the
entire raison d’être for Module::In
On 4/17/07, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# from Paul LeoNerd Evans
# on Tuesday 17 April 2007 02:14 am:
>I ran into similar issues; I've discussed them earlier on this list.
Yep.
# from David Golden on Sunday 11 March 2007 05:43 am:
>This bug is the result of CPANPLUS trying to
# from Paul LeoNerd Evans
# on Tuesday 17 April 2007 02:14 am:
>I ran into similar issues; I've discussed them earlier on this list.
Yep.
# from David Golden on Sunday 11 March 2007 05:43 am:
>This bug is the result of CPANPLUS trying to be clever and "falling
>back" to generating a Makefi
On 4/16/07, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If META.yml says you need Module::Build and I don't provide a
Makefile.PL, wouldn't that be a good time to install Module::Build?
Should I just put a die in Makefile.PL to avoid this silly "we're
obviously missing the required build system but
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:49:07 -0700
Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If META.yml says you need Module::Build and I don't provide a
> Makefile.PL, wouldn't that be a good time to install Module::Build?
>
> Should I just put a die in Makefile.PL to avoid this silly "we're
> obviously miss
If META.yml says you need Module::Build and I don't provide a
Makefile.PL, wouldn't that be a good time to install Module::Build?
Should I just put a die in Makefile.PL to avoid this silly "we're
obviously missing the required build system but we'll try to pretend
anyway" stuff?
http://www.nnt
16 matches
Mail list logo
