Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-04 Thread Matt S Trout
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:56:50PM +0200, Peter Rabbitson wrote: > [1] > https://web.archive.org/web/20161004214347/http://blogs.perl.org/users/peter_rabbitson/2013/07/crowdsourcing-self-confidence.html#comment-1129854 "So far as I'm concerned you've been the DBIC chainsaw delegate for years" De

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-04 Thread Peter Rabbitson
On 10/05/2016 12:17 AM, Joel Berger wrote: While yes I think it would have been helpful if the intention made at the time of the transfer of first-come to you were in a more public forum than IRC logs, I also think that comments halfway down a BPO posting isn't a great place to assert BDFL-ness

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-04 Thread David Golden
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Graham Knop wrote: > Forgive me if I don't. > That's fine. Your comments address the meta-issue. > PAUSE has no governance model. Nor, really, does "Perl" in the broadest sense. PAUSE admins have discussed this in coming up with a response. What people thin

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-04 Thread Peter Rabbitson
On 10/04/2016 11:36 PM, Matt S Trout wrote: Had I not got explicit agreement before transferring anything that all I was doing was easing co-maint addition, I would absolutely not have gone down this route. Since we are digging in the past: had I not gotten an unambiguous legitimization of my

Re: Message from PAUSE Admins to DBIx::Class maintainers [resend]

2016-10-04 Thread Matt S Trout
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 05:15:10PM -0400, Graham Knop wrote: > On 10/3/16 4:46 PM, David Golden wrote: > > *Everyone, please direct all further conversation on this matter to the > > DBIC mailing list* > > Forgive me if I don't. While I've been watching the conversation, > nobody yet seems to hav