I don't exactly how much stuff have been implemented in mono. There
are some thing that I like to see in mono.
I want to see a system wide api in Mono (sonthing like System.linux or
linux.system). By using this u can handle any kind of stuff on linux.
Everything (i.e. services, cronjobs, even kern
Hi,
I have been having difficulties compiling mono (1.1.13.6) from source on
my FC4 machine (using the standard fedora compiler gcc 4.0.2). The
attached simple patch has solved my problems (in that I can get things
to compile now) but I'm not sure whether this is the correct solution.
Cheers,
Ja
Tomi,
You were able to get mono to build on the arm? If so how ?
Very Interested,
Dave
On 29-Mar-06, at 5:02 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Hey,
What would be the top feature you would like to see in Mono?
Think of a feature that is not somet
Ter, 2006-03-28 às 15:55 -0600, Francisco T. Martinez escreveu:
Paulo Augusto wrote:
> > Seg, 2006-03-27 às 07:44 -0600, Francisco T. Martinez escreveu:
> >
> >> ...
> >>
> >> As far as having your application distributed in Windows, you could
> >> consider having your app run with the .NET Fra
The option to somehow merge (or at least synchronize) your MS.NET GAC and
your mono GAC would be nice. There probably is a very good reason not to do
this that I haven't thought of yet though.
-Matt McDonald
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Be
A generational and compacting GC has my vote as well.
- raf
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 13:46 +0100, Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
> Jonathan Pryor wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 11:33 +0100, Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Don't want to throw stones as its amazing what was achieved in Mono, but
>
Ter, 2006-03-28 às 20:47 -0500, Miguel de Icaza escreveu:
Hey,
>
> What would be the top feature you would like to see in Mono?
>
> Think of a feature that is not something we are currently working
> on (we know about those), for example avoid saying: a class-is-missing
> feature or "ID
Em Ter, 2006-03-28 às 20:47 -0500, Miguel de Icaza escreveu:
> What would be the top feature you would like to see in Mono?
A talking clip for MonoDevelop. Everytime I need something I think "oh,
the IDE should show a little cute clip with that information for me!"
Maybe the clip could be use
Hi Miguel,
> What would be the top feature you would like to
> see in Mono?
1) Explicit (GC_Free style) assembly unloading.
2) Assembly unloading via application domain unload.
3) Full bytecode verification.
(But you knew that)
;-)
Cheers,
Jim/Babbage.
_
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 19:41 -0300, Rafael Teixeira wrote:
> We need to implement shadow copying to allow for changes on running
> assemblies (but aside from ASP.NET where it is enabled by default,
> even on MS' .NET one need to turn it on explicitly for every AppDomain
> that needs it).
> That tur
Rusmin Susanto wrote:
If I need to access the operator quite often, I am afraid that a
numerous calls to "new" will slow down the program (as it needs to
allocate 200 x 200 array of double).
You're asking if, in A + B + C + D + E + F, only one new allocation can be made,
is that correct? If s
Just one topic commented, that also adds my personal request.
On 3/29/06, Joe Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> And one thing that has always bugged me: my apps all behave strangely
> and then crash when I recompile underneath a running instance. That's
> very annoying, and I suspect it's a
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 08:47 -0800, Konstantin Triger wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Attached a small refactoring for HttpApplicationFactory class enabling
> having the common code base with J2EE platform.
>
> For J2EE this solves the “global static variables” problem.
Feel free to commit in HEAD.
-
Larry Ewing wrote:
> F-Spot has the
> start of a sane binding that I did in my spare time. I plan to finish
> it at some point. TWAIN is unlikely as it can involve direct win32
> calls.
TWAIN's available on Mac OS X, too. With some abstraction it should be
reasonably possible to support both Win
Thanks for a quick reply. So, there could be two cases. One being to
initialize DateTime, and the second, to use a different serialization
format. One, as XML does not have default initializer we had written a
code to perform the initialization of date to July 1, 1850, so looks
like thats not
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
What would be the top feature you would like to see in Mono?
more monkeys please.
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Hi.
Can someone tell me who is responsible for bugzilla.ximian.com? I
would like to use the ctype=csv option but I do not know who to talk
to.
Thanks,
Jacob
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailma
Hi guys,
I needed and tree data structure build out of similar objects. Each of
those objects is simply an ArrayList with some overhead needed for my
application. Obviously those objects can contain any number of
subobjects and so forth.
I have two questions related to that approach:
1. Is it a g
F-spot was a good example to use. I was meaning F-spot plus extra features. For instance, I would like to take an application like F-Spot and modify for my own special needs. Or create an entirely new application. Let's say whenever you talk to a customer on a phone, the audio from that i
1) -Remote debugger---
Debugging remote mono executables from the IDE. Be it SharpDevelop,
MonoDevelop, Eclipse, etc.
I hope I didn't miss the functionality if it already exists, please let me
know!!
Microsoft's solution for debugging a remote program is not the most
streamlined
Hi,
This stretched out a bit more than I originally intended. :)
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 20:47 -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> What would be the top feature you would like to see in Mono?
Although not really in Mono itself, one thing I would like to see is
better integration with automake. T
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 07:57 -0800, Daniel Morgan wrote:
> 3. Let's not forget scanning, photos, printing Bindings to SANE,
> TWAIN... Get GnomePrint to be stable like the GTK version. I hear
> gtk+ hackers are moving GnomePrint from GNOME to GTK+ and making it
> cross-platform. This is v
Hello,
Attached a small refactoring for HttpApplicationFactory
class enabling having the common code base with J2EE platform.
For J2EE this solves the “global static variables”
problem.
If no one objects I’ll commit.
Regards,
Konstantin Triger
HttpApplicationFactory
OK. I finally got a compile, using this line:
mcs -debug -out:test.exe -reference:System.Windows.Forms.dll
-reference:System.dll -reference:System.Drawing.dll MainForm.cs
Program.cs
The program runs, no errors.
The Main function is on line 9, the first function call on line 11.
Can so
Jacek Blaszczynski wrote:
3) Equivalent of WPF for future GUI requirements but cross platform -
I know Migual blog entries about Avalon but a Gtk sharp as an
alternative is really far too short of achieving anything impressive.
QT4 bindings to provide an alternative to WinForms and GTK# for
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 10:56 -0500, Gonzalo Paniagua Javier wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 06:40 -0800, Vladimir Krasnov wrote:
> > Hi Gonzalo,
> >
> > What if the response from SMTP server is multi-line? For example, SMTP
> > from IIS 6.0 returns multi-line response on EHLO command.
>
> Did you c
Here are my ideas I would like to see for Mono, Gtk#, and applications. 1. I would love to see a fully managed CLI runtime. The fully managed CLI runtime would be written completely in managed languages like C#, IL, and Boo. The whole thing does not have to be written in one language. Var
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 06:40 -0800, Vladimir Krasnov wrote:
> Hi Gonzalo,
>
> What if the response from SMTP server is multi-line? For example, SMTP
> from IIS 6.0 returns multi-line response on EHLO command.
Did you care taking a look at the RFC to know how the client knows that
it has to read an
Thanks! That will take a while, I expect. I've not yet gotten all the nuances down regarding the mono compile vs the windows project.wadeOn 3/28/06,
Miguel de Icaza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,> I want to see if I can single step the code under linux.>> The mdb is 0.12 on centos. The e
Hello friends,
I am using ./configure CC=i386-linux-uclibc-gcc CFLAGS=-Os
--enable-minimal=aot,profiler --with-preview=no
--prefix=/usr/local/mono/boardmono --host=i386-pc-linux
--with-tls=pthread
and I am using mono version -- > mono-1.1.13.4
The error which i am getting is http://pastebin.com/
Possibly even with the possibility to enable the use of .wapi at runtime
from within the application
- Original Message -
From: "Matthijs ter Woord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Miguel de Icaza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] What wo
What i'd like to see in mono is the ability to start up an application
without it needing a .WAPI folder. I understand why mono needs the wapi
folder, but i'm sure there are application for which one wouldn't need one
at all.
- Original Message -
From: "Miguel de Icaza" <[EMAIL PROTECT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am the developer and i shouldn't make my users test that kind of
> stuff. It is
> i who should test it. Only when i can make it work for myself, should i make
> my
> users use such.
>
> Anyway, my first attempt failed miserably, i don't like the idea of my program
> be
Hi Gonzalo,
What if the response from SMTP server is multi-line? For example, SMTP
from IIS 6.0 returns multi-line response on EHLO command.
Vladimir Krasnov
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gonzalo
Paniagua Javier
Sent: Tuesday, March 28
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
Given all the interdependencies between JITed code, executing code, and
call stacks, unloading types is a difficult proposition, which is
probably why an AppDomain unload is the only way to do that under .NET.
Yes, that's probably the reason. Still, I
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 15:22 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Also, I don't like python very much, and I'd like the language to be
> strictly typed. What I would like is a C# with type unloading.
.NET 1.1 *has* type unloading. It just requires unloading the hosting
AppDomain in order to unload the
Jonathan Pryor wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 11:33 +0100, Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
Don't want to throw stones as its amazing what was achieved in Mono, but
IMO, Microsoft's implementation of Garbage Collection is considerably
better - not speed wise, but reclaiming memory that is no longer in
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Dave Cramer wrote:
Tomi,
You were able to get mono to build on the arm? If so how ?
Hi,
Yes, Mono runtime compiles fine on ARM when using Scratchbox, and mcs and
the classlibs compile fine too if you first build a mono-devkit for
Scratchbox.
Tomi
___
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 13:02 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
- More support for dynamic languages. Perhaps there's an unsafe way (read:
you have to know what you are doing) to unload types. Or perhaps a
modified mcs could generate code for dynamic methods.
Miguel de Icaza a écrit :
> What would be the top feature you would like to see in Mono?
STM (Software Transactional Memory) support, which allows for lock-free
concurrent programming :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_transactional_memory
http://www.cambridge.intel-research.net/~rennals/f
Title: Re: [Mono-dev] What would you like to see in Mono?
Hi!
1) The feature which is surely missing is a Compact Mono - equivalent to "Compact" .NET - however with significantly reduced footprint.
2) Needles to say full implementation of UI based on System.Windows.Forms namespace API - I
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 13:02 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> - More support for dynamic languages. Perhaps there's an unsafe way (read:
> you have to know what you are doing) to unload types. Or perhaps a
> modified mcs could generate code for dynamic methods. Or something else I
> haven't thought
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 11:33 +0100, Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
> Don't want to throw stones as its amazing what was achieved in Mono, but
> IMO, Microsoft's implementation of Garbage Collection is considerably
> better - not speed wise, but reclaiming memory that is no longer in use.
This is because
I'd like to see better memory management for long running applications -
particularly in memory fragmentation area that seems to be rather weak
in .NET (and any other GC based language?)
Don't want to throw stones as its amazing what was achieved in Mono, but
IMO, Microsoft's implementation
Le mardi 28 mars 2006 à 20:47 -0500, Miguel de Icaza a écrit :
Hey,
What would be the top feature you would like to see in Mono?
Think of a feature that is not something we are currently working
on (we know about those), for example avoid saying: a class-is-missing
feature or "ID
Hey,
What would be the top feature you would like to see in Mono?
Think of a feature that is not something we are currently working
on (we know about those), for example avoid saying: a class-is-missing
feature or "IDE" or "the debugger". We know about those.
Miguel.
Something simila
I've reeopen bug : http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=75172
In our intranet we use remoting, and we have an client interface and a server with many method...
We the number of method exceed 500, mcs crashes badly with :
Unhandled Exception: System.NullReferenceException: Object referenc
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Hey,
What would be the top feature you would like to see in Mono?
Think of a feature that is not something we are currently working
on (we know about those), for example avoid saying: a class-is-missing
feature or "IDE" or "the debugger". We
48 matches
Mail list logo
