Submit a ticket to where about what ?
I'm sorry, but I just don't understand what your talking about.
On Wednesday, 20 March 2013 03:15:02 UTC, pixel67 wrote:
>
> Submit a ticket and see what happens lol
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Andree Christaldi <
> tom.baby...@googlemail.com > w
Why doesn't mootools just go on a merge bonanza.
There's aloads of cool additions and bugfixes in the pull requests... why
not, if there's no conflicts - cast a cursory glance of them and if they
look okay.. just merge them.
If someone at some points finds out something is causing issues, then
Nice work... great to see.
On Friday, 15 March 2013 20:21:58 UTC, piotr_cz wrote:
>
> Hi there.
> As you are probably aware, Joomla since version 3.0 is using Bootstrap
> and jQuery in it's core.
> Developers are not forced to use these, but are the default templating
> tools (MooTools 1.4
I have found that this group is very helpful when people ask questions,
it's hit or miss at jQ's the McDonalds of JS. I've seen tickets just go
unanswered for ever, that's what I'm talking about, is that what you are
referring to? Sanford's link show's that someone had a problem and that
problem wa
I've been in your shoes, I got frustrated with mootools when I first was
learning, but I'm back and here to tell you the grass is not greener on the
other side. If you love JavaScript like I do, than stick with mootools,
it's more in line with the language :)
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Tony
I do love mootools, I've been using it for about 4-5 years - exclusively,
and wrote code for it and submitted pull requests.
The thing is, it's not moving forward. Mootools core developers are too
busy (facebooking?) and not commiting other code people are writing and
submitting.. so it's stagn
So help out, help make it better, because it is better :)
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Andree Christaldi <
tom.babything...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I do love mootools, I've been using it for about 4-5 years - exclusively,
> and wrote code for it and submitted pull requests.
>
> The thing is,
I did help out, I submitted bug fixes and additional features to mootools
more.. as many other users have .. no commits going on .. nothing.. only
tumble weed.
On Wednesday, 20 March 2013 11:32:07 UTC, pixel67 wrote:
>
> So help out, help make it better, because it is better :)
>
> On Wed, Mar
Well this is what I got from Arron:
"This is in line with what I was saying earlier. The core dev team is
largely distracted or unavailable *cough*facebook*cough*. If this community
wants MooTools to take a next step, the best, most direct way to make that
happen is to start working. Remake the web
As a result of a conversation in another thread about helping jumpstart the
MooTools community and development, I thought I would try my hand at
refreshing the look of the website. A couple things before I share the
links to the mockups, though.
1. The look of the current website isn't bad.
I love it. The big icons (below the logo) are a little too big for my
tastes, but that's a personal preference that I'm happy to cope with on my
own. More importantly is the fact that it pulls a lot of new content onto
the page and makes it clear what resources are available.
Some small thoughts:
So, a disclaimer before I answer this post. Years ago, I was a very active
developer within the MooTools community. I wrote the majority of the
plugins you see in MooTools More (originally found on my blog Clientcide).
I wrote a book, I wrote the original docs for MooTools Core, I wrote the
MooTori
I agree it is pretty fine!
My two cents:
The version number within the download button and near a link to archived
versions
The main icons maybe a little smaller
--
Andrea
Il giorno 20/mar/2013, alle ore 22:42, Aaron Newton ha
scritto:
I love it. The big icons (below the logo) are a little too
Thank you so much Benjamin!
You're the kind of dev project leads dream of :3
- JDD
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Andrea D. wrote:
> I agree it is pretty fine!
>
> My two cents:
> The version number within the download button and near a link to archived
> versions
> The main icons maybe a li
http://felixge.de/2013/03/11/the-pull-request-hack.html
On Mar 20, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Aaron Newton wrote:
> So, a disclaimer before I answer this post. Years ago, I was a very active
> developer within the MooTools community. I wrote the majority of the plugins
> you see in MooTools More (or
Thanks for the feedback, everyone, I'm glad you like the general direction.
A couple follow-up questions before I update the mocks:
- My original intention was for the download button to just link to the
download page, where you could customize your build and download older
versions as
I'd like to chime in re: the download button. I think you maybe need to
have the main download button (perhaps with version number) just
download the latest full minified Core, with a link below saying
"customise" or "other versions" or something. Even better if clicking
the main button started
This is cleaner,
nice work!
I agree that a redesigning the site would send a strong message. Or rather,
that the site as it is doesn't look maintained. There's nothing on the site
that gives the indication that the framework is being updated or worked on.
Since most people will only see the MooToo
like
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Erik Cervin Edin wrote:
> This is cleaner,
> nice work!
>
> I agree that a redesigning the site would send a strong message. Or
> rather, that the site as it is doesn't look maintained. There's nothing on
> the site that gives the indication that the framew
Thanks, Erik. What you wrote mirrors my own sentiment as well. I really
feel like the community is the key thing to spark here. Sure, the Core code
could use updates from time to time, especially with all the new devices
joining the market, but it's pretty mature and has a sensible API.
Persona
Good suggestions across the board. I'll incorporate them in the next draft.
On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 5:37:28 PM UTC-7, Barryvan wrote:
>
> I'd like to chime in re: the download button. I think you maybe need to
> have the main download button (perhaps with version number) just download
> th
> http://felixge.de/2013/03/11/the-pull-request-hack.html
Interesting post. It at first seems radical, but on further reading
Felix is clear that he means that quality, bug-free code is a
prerequisite for committer status -- and that status can still be
revoked. So while it's less despotic than th
22 matches
Mail list logo
