Re: [MOPO] Fwd: [MOPO] BONHAM'S DISASTER not a disaster for MovieArt

2006-01-23 Thread lobby card invasion
A- is only slightly better B+.Does that qualify for "close to mint"? Zeev - Original Message - From: Michael B To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 5:24 PM Subject: Re: [MOPO] Fwd: [MOPO] BONHAM'S DISASTER not a disaster

Re: [MOPO] Fwd: [MOPO] BONHAM'S DISASTER not a disaster for MovieArt

2006-01-23 Thread JR
] Fwd: [MOPO] BONHAM'S DISASTER not a disaster for MovieArt Grading condition is often all in the eye of the beholder. I've long found auction house grading in the A,B, C method applied to posters is the loosest of the lot. A simple out of 10 doesn't do it for me either. We prefer to describe

[MOPO] Fwd: [MOPO] BONHAM'S DISASTER not a disaster for MovieArt

2006-01-22 Thread Kirby McDaniel
Begin forwarded message:From: Kirby McDaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: January 22, 2006 11:29:02 AM CSTTo: Shelly Whitworth-King [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [MOPO] BONHAM'S DISASTER not a disaster for MovieArt I bought ten posters from Bonham's and all of them were quite good.  SoI have no

Re: [MOPO] Fwd: [MOPO] BONHAM'S DISASTER not a disaster for MovieArt

2006-01-22 Thread Doug Ball
@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 5:24 PM Subject: Re: [MOPO] Fwd: [MOPO] BONHAM'S DISASTER not a disaster for MovieArt kirby--- kirby, my guess is that you attended the auction or had a dealer-friend look at the items you sought. clearly, if you attend

Re: [MOPO] Fwd: [MOPO] BONHAM'S DISASTER not a disaster for MovieArt

2006-01-22 Thread Phil Edwards Cinema Arts
, January 22, 2006 5:24 PM *Subject:* Re: [MOPO] Fwd: [MOPO] BONHAM'S DISASTER not a disaster for MovieArt kirby--- kirby, my guess is that you attended the auction or had a dealer-friend look at the items you sought. clearly, if you attend in person, you cannot get burnt

Re: [MOPO] Fwd: [MOPO] BONHAM'S DISASTER not a disaster for MovieArt

2006-01-22 Thread Doug Ball
@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 6:34 PM Subject: Re: [MOPO] Fwd: [MOPO] BONHAM'S DISASTER not a disaster for MovieArt Grading condition is often all in the eye of the beholder. I've long found auction house grading in the A,B, C method applied to posters is the loosest of the lot

Re: [MOPO] Fwd: [MOPO] BONHAM'S DISASTER not a disaster for MovieArt

2006-01-22 Thread Toochis Morin
I was at the auction and unfortunately won nothing. I did notice, however, that there were several faded posters which people won and they were at the auction! They saw the damage and still bid. Those buyers knew what they bought. I wanted the IN A LONELY PLACE insert but when I saw it

Re: [MOPO] Fwd: [MOPO] BONHAM'S DISASTER not a disaster for MovieArt

2006-01-22 Thread Ron Moore
I wasn't able to attend the Bonham's auction and I was not planning on bidding with them because I couldn't attend- that is until I had a friend in LA look at the items for me in person. Then I felt I could at least bid via phone. My prior experience with Bonhams Butterfield's has not been a

Re: [MOPO] Fwd: [MOPO] BONHAM'S DISASTER not a disaster for MovieArt

2006-01-22 Thread Kirby McDaniel
I certainly did not mean to demean Michael's post or his experience with Bonham's. I simply chose 10 posters - and it didn't hurt that I had Freeman Fisher look at them for me - and the posters I got were all OK. I agree with Ron that a unified grading system would be good, but then so would