Ben Hutchings wrote:
The idea is simply to let people use a familiar format and tools, not to
support arbitrary
existing web pages.
Ah, ok. That makes life simpler. ;)
-Boris
___
mozilla-embedding mailing list
mozilla-embedding@mozilla.org
http://
On 2005-10-27, Boris Zbarsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> The extents of the content of the link.
>
> You mean the smallest rectangle that contains all the layout objects
> corresponding to descendants of the link DOM node in the DOM?
I suppose so, yes.
> You can get that
Ben Hutchings wrote:
The extents of the content of the link.
You mean the smallest rectangle that contains all the layout objects
corresponding to descendants of the link DOM node in the DOM?
You can get that by getting the rectangles for all those nodes and taking the
minimal bounding rect
Boris Zbarsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> Currently I'm using nsIDOMNSDocument::GetBoxObjectFor to find the
>> extents of each link before scanning for changes, but this doesn't
>> always provide the correct extents for my purposes.
>
> What do you mean by "extents of each
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Currently I'm using nsIDOMNSDocument::GetBoxObjectFor to find the
extents of each link before scanning for changes, but this doesn't
always provide the correct extents for my purposes.
What do you mean by "extents of each link", exactly? Given positioned content,
etc, a s
Boris Zbarsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> I don't suppose you can help with my other query about link extents?
>
> I'm not sure I saw this query.
Then I'll post it again:
I'm working on an application that uses Mozilla to render pages for
inclusion on a DVD. DVDs can onl
