I am currently using Mozilla 0.8 and want to upgrade to 0.9.
Do I need to de-install my current version ?
Pete
On Sat, 19 May 2001 17:12:01 -0400, Bill Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
somehow managed to type:
>The browser works (generally) flawless for me as well. And I MUCH
>prefer it over IE. It's the mail/news that has all the holes.
This has always surprised me. I mean, the browser, which has to unde
Peter, I use kernel 2.4.4 with Mozilla .9 as well as the nightlies, so
conflicts with the kernel are out. I would suggest downloading the .9
build of Mozilla for daily use under kernel 2.4.4. You really should
stay away from Netscape's versions right now as they are based on much
older release
I recently installed RedHat 7.1 with no problems .. until I tried to
install the latest (Mozilla) version of Netscape. I get a
"segmentation fault" after the install copies the files and if I try to
run
Navigator, I get the following mess.
Any idea? Is anyone else having this problem???
My o
For those of you, who have been experiencing issues/crashes, etc with
the more recent Mozilla builds, you might want to try the classic theme
as opposed to modern. For whatever reason (I'm not a programmer), I
noticed a dramatic improvement in overall stability on my system when
running it th
Bill Lee wrote:
>
> Fabian Guisset wrote:
>
>>Bart Meerdink wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Maybe this is flamebait in this newsgroup, but that's not my intention.
>>>
>>Too bad. This is not only a flamebait, it is also an insult to the project.
>>
>>Fabian.
>>
>>
> We, as public testers, are constantly told
> My concern is, that there seems to be little concern for the reasons
> behind these regressions (amount of coupling, tolerance for 'shortcuts'
> and varying programming practices). I always must think of the
> relentless auditing of Theo de Raadt and his OpenBSD collegues.
>
> But in the end
Hi,
I'd like to have your opinions on this: scroll bars shouldn't have
context menu or at least not the same one as the web page's. What do
you think? Sometimes I right click on the scroll bar instead of the
page and it leads to a bug. I don't find it in bugzilla so I'll describe
it. Plea
Ahmad Al-rasheedan wrote:
> Can one have icons in bookmark toolbar instead of just text?
>
You mean like favicon.ico in Win IE? It's a very annoying
and poorly implemented in IE. There's a bug on this as a
possible feature, with details on a much better
implementation that isn't annoying in
Fabian Guisset wrote:
>
> Bart Meerdink wrote:
>
> > Maybe this is flamebait in this newsgroup, but that's not my intention.
>
> Too bad. This is not only a flamebait, it is also an insult to the project.
>
> Fabian.
>
We, as public testers, are constantly told upon complaining/reporting
pro
Thanks for your constructive reply!
Christian Mattar wrote:
> So, who defines what "Mozilla should be"? The Slashdot-crowd? The
> End-User? Web-designers? You?
Well, I asked the readers here at n.p.mozilla.general. But I would say
that IE is still the main reference, with addition of mail/n
Can one have icons in bookmark toolbar instead of just text?
Randall Parker wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 May 2001 13:25:07 -0700 esteemed Jeffrey W. Baker did'st hold
> forth thusly:
> > Am I the only one who finds the nightlies unusable? I download them
> > faithfully, but they crash within a few moments of launch. I've reverted
> > to 0.9 with galeon...
>
>
FB wrote:
>
> Bill Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
> > I got Moz .9 running again by deleting the registry.dat (for about the
> > 50th time), but now I had to start/import a new profile again, and it
> > put it in windows/application data/mozilla.! Je
Randall Parker wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2001 13:25:07 -0700 esteemed Jeffrey W. Baker did'st hold
> forth thusly:
>
>> Am I the only one who finds the nightlies unusable? I download them
>> faithfully, but they crash within a few moments of launch. I've reverted
>> to 0.9 with galeon...
>
>
On Thu, 17 May 2001 20:10:55 +0200 esteemed Peter Lairo did'st hold forth
thusly:
> sorry about the caps, but i'm hoping on getting some attention to this
> matter - and trying to see if others are having similar problems ;)
Peter,
What does "Latest Nightlies" mean? For me at this moment that
On Thu, 17 May 2001 13:25:07 -0700 esteemed Jeffrey W. Baker did'st hold
forth thusly:
> Am I the only one who finds the nightlies unusable? I download them
> faithfully, but they crash within a few moments of launch. I've reverted
> to 0.9 with galeon...
They work well for me in most cases. J
Gervase Markham wrote:
>>This is the first time anybody mentioned that there are "production
>>newsgroups". Ok, I can accept that (even as I was surprised by this).
>>
>
> Do you think we have 70 newsgroups just for chatting in? ;-) Work gets
> done here.
I said I accept that. So why argue?
Bill Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> I got Moz .9 running again by deleting the registry.dat (for about the
> 50th time), but now I had to start/import a new profile again, and it
> put it in windows/application data/mozilla.! Jesus, how about a
> littl
On Sat, 19 May 2001 08:52:15 -0400, Orrin Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
somehow managed to type:
>Is
>this also sending a message to devlopers who would think of XP as cross
>platform, that MS might be opening up to cross-platform systems?
Microsoft is using the abbreviation XP to stand f
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Orrin Edenfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It just dawned on me, that Mozilla has been using the abreviation "XP"
> for some time now, to stand for cross-platform.
When I first read about the announcement of the name, I immediate though
someone is going to dr
It just dawned on me, that Mozilla has been using the abreviation "XP"
for some time now, to stand for cross-platform. After ordering a
computer and gettin the option to get Microsoft Office 2000, or Office
XP, it dawned on me that Microsoft was using the term, for a different
meaning. Is "X
Thanks Bill. well yep, you have answered all questions :-)
Thanks Bill.
Pete
Bill Lee wrote:
> Peter Moscatt wrote:
>
>> I am currently using Mozilla 0.8 and now see there is a newer version.
>> Is it worth to upgrade ?
>>
>> Pete
>>
>
> It doesn't crash any less if that's what you'r
Bart Meerdink wrote:
> Maybe this is flamebait in this newsgroup, but that's not my intention.
Too bad. This is not only a flamebait, it is also an insult to the project.
Fabian.
>
> People who have tried Opera on Linux migtht ask themselves if Opera
> isn't a lot closer to what Mozilla sh
Hi!
Bart Meerdink wrote:
>
> Maybe this is flamebait in this newsgroup, but that's not my intention.
>
> People who have tried Opera on Linux migtht ask themselves if Opera
> isn't a lot closer to what Mozilla should be than Mozilla itself (wrt
> functionality, I'm not speaking about the open s
I had a problem that was a bit like this, creating a new profile worked
for me.
There is a commandline switch for that, take a look at it (for a list of
the available switches, start mozilla in a terminal with -help).
Chuck Lalli wrote:
> I have two problems with mozilla right now.
>
> 1) i
Bill Lee wrote:
>
> Alex wrote:
>
> > Bill Lee wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "Jeffrey W. Baker" wrote:
> >>
> >>> Am I the only one who finds the nightlies unusable? I download them
> >>> faithfully, but they crash within a few moments of launch. I've
> >>> reverted
> >>> to 0.9 with galeon...
> >>>
>
Maybe this is flamebait in this newsgroup, but that's not my intention.
People who have tried Opera on Linux migtht ask themselves if Opera
isn't a lot closer to what Mozilla should be than Mozilla itself (wrt
functionality, I'm not speaking about the open source/license).
I really think that
Peter Moscatt wrote:
> I am currently using Mozilla 0.8 and now see there is a newer version.
> Is it worth to upgrade ?
>
> Pete
>
It doesn't crash any less if that's what you're asking. Otherwise,
it's a vast improvement.
bl
Alex wrote:
> Bill Lee wrote:
>
>>
>> "Jeffrey W. Baker" wrote:
>>
>>> Am I the only one who finds the nightlies unusable? I download them
>>> faithfully, but they crash within a few moments of launch. I've
>>> reverted
>>> to 0.9 with galeon...
>>>
>>
>> I barely find the Milestone .9 usable
I am currently using Mozilla 0.8 and now see there is a newer version.
Is it worth to upgrade ?
Pete
> This is the first time anybody mentioned that there are "production
> newsgroups". Ok, I can accept that (even as I was surprised by this).
Do you think we have 70 newsgroups just for chatting in? ;-) Work gets
done here.
> However, why no member of the "move this discussion to the newsgroups"
32 matches
Mail list logo
