ÄÄÇ»Å͸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇϽôµ¥ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ °ü·ÃÇÁ·Î±×·¥À»
¾öû Àú·ÅÇÑ °¡°Ý¿¡ ÆË´Ï´Ù
ÃÖ½ÅÇ®¹öÀü°ÔÀÓ. ÄÄÇ»ÅÍÀ¯Æ¿ÇÁ·Î±×·¥. ¼ºÀνõð µîµî
¾ø´Â°Ô ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù
¹°·Ð ½Å¿ëÀº ±âº»ÀÔ´Ï´Ù
ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³½ ¾ÆÀ̵ð·Î´Â ¿¬¶ôÀÌ µÇÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.
¾ÐÃàÈÀϼӿ¡ ¿¬¶ôó°¡ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù
ÇÚµåÆùÀ¸·Î ¿¬¶ôÁֽʽÿä
³¡À¸·Î Çã¶ô¾øÀ
> This is a very unscientific test. Obviously, the browser which supports
> anti-aliasing (albeit only on one platform) "looks better" than those
> that don't. Other than that, there's not much to choose between them.
I thought the anti-aliased text was the ugliest. Maybe it looks better than
no
Colin Thefleau wrote:
> I do a small test to find out which browser renders better and under which
> environment. This is very simple and only takes care of text now. I think
> the results will also interest the mozilla users. Basically eight partial
> pages are grouped into one picture, you h
> the array is pretty much essential i think. because you have to find the
> next object on the page (or the next tag). does GetElementByTag hold
> all tags in an array?
You probably want to get the top-level UL tag, then getElementsByTagName
('ul'), which returns a list of some sort. It ma
On 10/21/2001 5:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I click on New Message, it loads in the toolbar and when clicked
> it doesn't pop up unless right click Maximize and won't resize only
> stays
> one size, big,
> Reinstalled same problem
> Problem just started
> Any help, thanks.
> Using Nets
Well, that was *almost* right ;-) ... replace that while loop with this:
while (tgt && tgt.nodeName.toLowerCase()!="ul" &&
tgt.className!="foldheader") {
tgt = tgt.parentNode;
// this loop bubbles up through the content model to find either
// a or a .
}
if (!tgt) retur
> Is there anyway of adapting the script to work with Mozilla and IE?
Try this modified script which works in IE5+ and Mozilla. I've made
comments to explain to you what's happening. The id's are now classes
so you can have multiple collapsible lists.
Hope this helps
--J
===
When I click on New Message, it loads in the toolbar and when clicked
it doesn't pop up unless right click Maximize and won't resize only
stays
one size, big,
Reinstalled same problem
Problem just started
Any help, thanks.
Using Netscape® Communicator 4.78
Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 21 Oct 2001:
> Colin Thefleau wrote:
>
>> I do a small test to find out which browser renders better and
>> under which environment. This is very simple and only takes care
>> of text now. I think the res
Gervase Markham wrote:
>> Is there anyway of adapting the script to work with Mozilla and IE?
>
> Yes, but as far as I can see, the way it's written is so IE-specific
> that it basically means rewriting it.
>
> The first thing you need to know is that only IE supports accessing
> elements using
Colin Thefleau wrote:
> I do a small test to find out which browser renders better and under which
> environment. This is very simple and only takes care of text now. I think
> the results will also interest the mozilla users. Basically eight partial
> pages are grouped into one picture, you h
> Is there anyway of adapting the script to work with Mozilla and IE?
Yes, but as far as I can see, the way it's written is so IE-specific
that it basically means rewriting it.
The first thing you need to know is that only IE supports accessing
elements using the "document.all." syntax. The W3
> >> if(!document.all)
> >
> > document.all is IE only
>
> I don't quite understand this condition. if all page elements there are no
> page elements? is there a mozilla equivalent?
>
(!document.all) is true if the User Agent doesn't implement the
document.all thingy in its Document Objec
I do a small test to find out which browser renders better and under which
environment. This is very simple and only takes care of text now. I think
the results will also interest the mozilla users. Basically eight partial
pages are grouped into one picture, you have to choose the one you think
Wouldn't it be nice when in those rare moments that Mozilla doesn't shut
down properly (using Mozilla 0.9.5) that the cache could survive. I
really like the stability of 0.9.5., but like its predecessors, coughs
up the cache when it falls down.
I hope that this is address soon. Anyway, keep
Thanks... that's about what I expected. Do you know if there is any way
to bring over settings, mail filters, etc.? It isn't a disaster if
there isn't, as that stuff is all pretty easy to recreate.
I did notice that on Windows Mozilla uses CRLF line endings in the mail
files. I can fix tha
Christian Mattar wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Yatsu wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > so..
>> >
>> > if(document.getElementByID("foldheader"))
>>
>> I'm afraid the javascript console complains at this line.
>> "document.getElementByID is not a function."
>
> It's 'getElementById', not 'getElementByID'.
>
> Christian
I'm having less of those problems with later nightly builds.
The fact that these versions fix the problem of invisible recipients
when composing emails is enough for me.
sTu.
Jeandré wrote:
>>>After 1 day on 095 in which:
>>>- the browser would crash for no apparent reason,
>>>
>>Same here -
Hi!
Yatsu wrote:
>
> >
> > so..
> >
> > if(document.getElementByID("foldheader"))
>
> I'm afraid the javascript console complains at this line.
> "document.getElementByID is not a function."
It's 'getElementById', not 'getElementByID'.
Christian
On 10/21/01 12:32 PM, Jim Mayer wrote:
> I'm attempting to migrate my home system from NT4 to Linux. I currently
> use Mozilla for reading mail on my NT system. Does anybody know what I
> need to do to move my mail setup over to Mozilla on Linux?
Mozilla uses the Unix mbox format on all plat
Hi,
I'm attempting to migrate my home system from NT4 to Linux. I currently
use Mozilla for reading mail on my NT system. Does anybody know what I
need to do to move my mail setup over to Mozilla on Linux?
The mail files look pretty much like standard unix mail folders, and the
".msf" files
Yatsu wrote:
> DeMoN LaG wrote:
>
>> William Leese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>> 9qt5sp$2fuo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9qt5sp$2fuo$[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 20 Oct 2001:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> A while ago i was looking for a simple, fast collapsible and
>>> expandable tree menu for quick navigation
DeMoN LaG wrote:
> William Leese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> 9qt5sp$2fuo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9qt5sp$2fuo$[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 20 Oct 2001:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> A while ago i was looking for a simple, fast collapsible and
>> expandable tree menu for quick navigation. Having looked at a larg
23 matches
Mail list logo
