get a 404 at themes.org, where are the themes now?
kh
konquorer has this enabled by default too doesn't it?
I wouldn't say that it was only eye candy value! When you're using the
tabs it's sometimes easy to get confused, especailly when people use
innapropriate tags. This is usability! Nice feature.
David Gerard wrote:
> but by Crikey it's nice
KH wrote:
> get a 404 at themes.org, where are the themes now?
http://www.themes.org/skins/mozilla/
--
Joni
Stop Searching And Start Earning
Begin The Winter Of 2001
With distributorships in your area readily available.
Lifetime opportunity with the hottest business development program in the US!
Locations going quickly
Contact us now, to see if your area is available.
For A Free Investment P
Stop Searching And Start Earning
Begin The Winter Of 2001
With distributorships in your area readily available.
Lifetime opportunity with the hottest business development program in the US!
Locations going quickly
Contact us now, to see if your area is available.
For A Free Investment P
David Hyatt wrote:
> Make sure you ban Konqueror too. :)
And don't forget IE...!
ian.
Joni K. wrote:
> KH wrote:
>> get a 404 at themes.org, where are the themes now?
> http://www.themes.org/skins/mozilla/
http://www.geocities.com/alfredkayser/mozilla/themes.htm
jacky wrote:
>
> which Open Source JVM are successful used in mozilla?
> I mean that when mozilla encounter some Java Applets , the mozilla can use
> JVM to explain these?
>
> The mozilla use blackwood as a bridge between Java and browsers, I know this
> work well on Sun JDK,
> but as open sourc
After changing Email programs I now find that whenever Netscape 4.7
starts it says that It can't use an external mail program because
postal.dll is missing.
I've tried re-installing N4.7 and it made no difference.
Can someone tell me either how to change Netscape to use Messenger for
Email by de
Jacek Piskozub wrote:
> I'm shocked by your opportunism.
Opportunism? I'm afraid I don't understand how opportunism comes into play here.
> But maybe I'm wrong and banning everyone except IE usets is *the way*.
Who said anything about banning everyone except IE users? The technique
I've
Jay Garcia wrote:
>
> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
>
> >
> > Jay Garcia wrote:
> >
> >>alpha wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I'll think that mozilla mail is extremly difficult to setup, anyone else
> >>>have this opinon. ?
> >>>
> >>>Outlook I can setup in 2min but mozilla mail I have to strugle with
On 11/20/01 11:47 AM, Greg Miller wrote:
>>But maybe I'm wrong and banning everyone except IE usets is *the way*.
>>
>
>
> Who said anything about banning everyone except IE users? The technique
> I've implemented now only affects favicon spammers.
Whats your website? Would it affect me if
Title: 6x6 InterNetwork Group
Hello!IN RUSSIAN
PLEASE EXCUSE THE DISTURBANCE BUT WE CONSIDER IT OUR DUTY TO MAKE YOU AN OFFER THAT WILL HELP YOU BECOME WEALTHIER, FREER AND HAPPIER!
We are offering you a unique business opportunity of the 6x6 system. Anyone able to spend two-three hours a
George Simonishvili wrote:
>After changing Email programs I now find that whenever Netscape 4.7
>starts it says that It can't use an external mail program because
>postal.dll is missing.
>
>I've tried re-installing N4.7 and it made no difference.
>
>Can someone tell me either how to change Netsca
Title: IRG Associates
Does this describe your
dream business?
No matter how I've set the bookmark to notify me when a web site
changes, I have gotten no such notification. Is this feature working yet?
Thanks for any help.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> alpha wrote:
>
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> >
> >>On 11/18/2001 11:13 AM, alpha wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I'll think that mozilla mail is extremly difficult to setup, anyone else
> >>>have this opino
Hi
I had installed Mozilla 0.9.5 and The SUN JDK 1.3.
This Configuration workes without any problems, but since a few days i get
allways a message "Load Applet" but nothing happened.
I do not change anything on mozilla or JAVA ( because the user i use do not
have rights to do that )
What to do?
I was going to some https pages from different websites on the Win32
11/19 build, and I noticed that the Mozilla lock icon wasn't locked.
Clicking on it showed that the pages' identity and encryption weren't
working. Reloading the page wasn't working (not that I should have to
do this anyway).
I
And it came to pass that George Simonishvili wrote:
> After changing Email programs I now find that whenever
> Netscape 4.7 starts it says that It can't use an external
> mail program because postal.dll is missing.
>
> I've tried re-installing N4.7 and it made no difference.
>
> Can someone tel
A lot of oppinions has been expressed with regard to if the favicon should
be default on or off since it might spam webservers with requests to a
non-existing file.
It would be really interesting to get some hard numbers on this. Just
looking at the current logs will not really say anything since
alpha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 20 Nov 2001:
>
> I see that you think that I'm a idiot who can't set up a mail
> account. But after been using alot of difftrent mail clients and
> when using mozilla mail and when I cannot set it up in the normal
>
The icon is not cached "forever". It simply has no specified
expiration. That just means it won't be doomed based only off some
expiration date. It can still be removed from the cache as the cache
fills up and needs to evict items.
dave
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Jonas Sicking wrote:
> A lot of
I've tried installing Mozilla onto my linux box without success. I've
had it working on linux before but installing wont work this time. It
says that installation is finished and then loads mozilla fine, but then
when I try to run it next time, my system stalls and the disk thrashes
a hell
But how/when is the absence of a file evicted? It would seem like a very
small gain for the cache-system to throw out since it would take up very few
(0) bytes. Also, Jacek Piskozub, said in the bug that the caching is per
session. Is this intended/a bug/incorrect?
In either case, the second form
Hmm ... this did not happen on my Mozilla. I'm running Build 200203
and I never had such problems with Netscape 6.1. However, the one
problem I did notice was trying to re-organize the Internet Explorer
favourites! Fortunately, just modifying the Favourites menu will fix
that problem si
Greetings!
When I was upgrading my Netscape 6.1 to 6.2 about a month ago, I noticed
the following :
On first time loading, the none of the menus will work properly.
After closing down Netscape 6.2 and restarting it (and ever since), the
task buttons, menu bars, address bars, and link bars have
how can i do it? it is perverse that the software doesn't
support it.
-jeph
--
Jeph Herrin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pratik wrote:
> On 11/20/01 11:47 AM, Greg Miller wrote:
>
>
>
>>> But maybe I'm wrong and banning everyone except IE usets is *the way*.
>>
>>
>>
>> Who said anything about banning everyone except IE users? The
>> technique I've implemented now only affects favicon spammers.
>
>
> Whats yo
some times , I receive mails encoded in "simplified chinease(HZ)" ,
netscape can not recognize this coding method and display garbage character.
when I select view->character coding->simplified chinease(HZ),
the preview window can display correctly,but the subject window(display
one line per ma
Jonas Sicking wrote:
> It would be really interesting to get some hard numbers on this. Just
> looking at the current logs will not really say anything since very few
> people browse with a mozilla with this pref turned on. So we need to come up
> with some way to approximate the number of 404s p
Well, here I am, working with 2001112008 and a buggy news client.
(http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=01)
Speaking of really long versioning, how exactly are the builds numbered? Any
pointers to documents on Moz versioning would be appreciated. I would also like
you to cc: my emai
Stephen Compall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 20 Nov 2001:
> Well, here I am, working with 2001112008 and a buggy news client.
> (http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=01)
>
> Speaking of really long versioning, how exactly are the builds
Hi,
When I delete a mail from imap server or local folder,
it seems that netscape dose not really delete it, in stead,
it delete something so I can not see that mail in netscape
but my mailbox become larger and larger.
How can netscape delete the mail really for me?
Asa Dotzler wrote:
>
> On October 20, 2001 mozilla.org made available for download binaries of
^^^
November, actually (aka "today") ;-)
> the Mozilla 0.9.6 Milestone. The builds and release notes are available
> at http://www.mozilla.org/releases/. New to this milestone are fixes
>
Hi,
I just got 0.9.6 and noticed that when I open a new tab, it doesn't go
to my home page like it does when I start up Mozilla. I looked in the
preferences, but couldn't find anywhere I can configure this. Can
anyone tell me where I can set this up?
Thanks in advance.
--Ed
I just installed Mozilla as Administrator and went back to my PowerUser
account.
Oddly enough, I don\'t see the icons on the URL bar as I usually do with
the nightly versions...
Is anyone else seeing this?
When I open http://www.mozilla.org/ though, I do see the icon. But not
with other website
Lasse Marøen wrote:
> Colin Blake wrote:
>
> > Any chance of an update? Or a real URL?
>
> The bugs are tracked here:
> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104864
Ah, of course, I should have known that since its so obvious. And with
the really helpful summary of "make 0.9.6 not suck" to
in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Colin Blake at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2001-11-20 12:44:
> Lasse Marøen wrote:
>
>> Colin Blake wrote:
>>
>>> Any chance of an update? Or a real URL?
>>
>> The bugs are tracked here:
>> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104864
>
> Ah, of course, I sh
-sky- wrote:
> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Colin Blake at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2001-11-20 12:44:
>
>
>>Lasse Marøen wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Colin Blake wrote:
>>>
>>>
Any chance of an update? Or a real URL?
>>>The bugs are tracked here:
>>>http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
40 matches
Mail list logo
