Re: New Features Wanted

On 27 Nov 2001 05:26:40 GMT, DeMoN LaG wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Hill) wrote in >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 27 Nov 2001: >>>They are as secure as fort knox compared to Active X >>> >> >> Please explain > >I've never seen a malicious Netscape plugin (even when Netscape

Re: New Features Wanted

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Hill) wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 27 Nov 2001: >>They are as secure as fort knox compared to Active X >> > > Please explain I've never seen a malicious Netscape plugin (even when Netscape had 80%+ marketshare). I've seen dozens of malicious

Re: New Features Wanted

I'll never get tired of referencing http://www.e.kth.se/~e97_jsi/rfe.mp3 :-) / Jonas Sicking "Robert Zaichkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Good evening! > > For Netscape 6.x and Mozilla 0.9.x, I have come up with the demand for > the f

Re: New Features Wanted

On 27 Nov 2001 03:41:35 GMT, DeMoN LaG wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Hill) wrote in >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 26 Nov 2001: > >> On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:50:42 +, Ian Thomas >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>Robert Zaichkowski wrote: 1. ActiveX support >>>

¥þ´ä­º­Ó Music Video ¼½©ñ°Q½×ª©

¥þ´ä­º­Ó Music Video ¼½©ñ°Q½×ª© http://forum.hkhost.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=75 ¦¬¶°¦UÃþ¥»¦a¤Î¥~¦aªº Music Video, ª½±µ¼½©ñ, ¥u»Ý±N­n¼½©ñªººq¦±ºôµ¸§¹¾ã¦ì¸m¶K¤W§Y¥i¡A²{¤ä´© ASF/MPG/MPEG ...Åwªïµoªí... ½Ð¨Ï¥Î [mtv]§¹¾ãºô§}[/mtv] ´¡¤J MTV ¼v¤ù

Re: Mozilla 1.0: JTK/Hixie performance criteria suggestions?

JTK wrote: [] > Sheesh, I > leave for a few days and the whole place goes to hell. "Few days"? I thought you went down with the WTC. I actually missed the local troll so WB - good to see things are returning to normal :) K.

Re: Simple things (visual, usability bugs) ?

True, true. I am new to this moz. thing so I was not sure what to do/say and where. I was wondering if I was the only one experiencing these, and if I should say anything about them or not. Pointless bugs in bugtracker are a real annoyance I would assume. And since I did not see any *really* c

Re: Simple things (visual, usability bugs) ?

On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:45:31 +0100, Pascal Chevrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Andrew Backer wrote: > >> *3. WHY! Why Ctrl-Sift-L to open a web location, and ctrl-o >> to open a normal file? I can't think of one time *ever* that I have >> wanted to open a file from inside mozilla/ie

Re: New Features Wanted

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Hill) wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 26 Nov 2001: > On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:50:42 +, Ian Thomas > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Robert Zaichkowski wrote: >>> 1. ActiveX support >>> >> >>IIRC this has been considered several times (I think th

Re: New Features Wanted

On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:50:42 +, Ian Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Robert Zaichkowski wrote: >> 1. ActiveX support >> > >IIRC this has been considered several times (I think they even got a >version working in Netscape 4.0) but it has been rejected because there >is no way to make it s

Re: Themes ?? Where??

Gord McFee wrote: > > Alfred Kayser wrote: > > > > nf wrote: > > > > > Where else can one get themes for Netscape 6.2/Mozilla? > > > > > > The "Theme Park" has a whopping *3* themes on it. There has GOT to be > > > more, no? > > > > > > > Yes, but not much. As the theme format keeps changing mos

Re: Themes ?? Where??

Alfred Kayser wrote: > > nf wrote: > > > Where else can one get themes for Netscape 6.2/Mozilla? > > > > The "Theme Park" has a whopping *3* themes on it. There has GOT to be > > more, no? > > > > Yes, but not much. As the theme format keeps changing most > authors just gave up. > > However,

Re: No plugins?

Fulvio Perini wrote: > > This is an obvious question.Did you look for the plugins,using Windows > Explorer,in the Plugin folder? > > Gord McFee wrote: > > > > I am using the following build: > > > > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.6+) Gecko/20011125 > > > > When I go to "About:plug

Re: spell check "learn" causes lockup

Wrong newsgroup check depending upon your platform. news://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.macintosh> (Mac) news://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator.windows> (windows) news://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.Communicator.unix> (unix) ---Dan'l wrote: > > Any idea how to fix Net Comm 4.7x fro

Re: Please check this site

Ole Kasper Olsen wrote: > > Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote: > > > 2 seconds flat downloading the opening page with Communicator 4.7.9 and > > 384K DSL Connection. > > 0.5 second flat downloading the opening page with Moz 2001112508 and > 2048Kbps ADSL Connection. ;) > > -- > Ole Kasper Olsen

Re: about:whatever

Ian Thomas wrote: > barney wrote: > >> about:(mozilla) > > I assume you mean about:mozilla Actually, the "mozilla" part is optional. :) >> about:config >> about:cache > > Dunno, these are kinda debug options though. I'm not sure I agree with you on these, cache in particular. about:cache

Re: Mozilla 1.0: JTK/Hixie performance criteria suggestions?

JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 26 Nov 2001: > > In other words, performance of half-as-good as min(IE,NS4.x) is not > achievable, and will not be part of the release criteria for > Mozilla 1.0. All that matters is a circled box on a calendar... >

spell check "learn" causes lockup

Any idea how to fix Net Comm 4.7x from locking up every time I ask my spell check to "learn"?? "Stop" and "Ignore" work just fine. tia daniel

Re: Buggy Mozilla/Software Need Auto-Save in Email

Thanks for the link. I wasn't sure if "bug" was the right term so I didn't think of looking in the bug list. :) s. Ian Thomas wrote: > Sam S. Onite wrote: > >> I prefer mozilla, eventhough it's a work in progress and things still >> need to be worked on. Still a great browser. >> >> Since

Re: quicktime

lal_truckee wrote: > is there a linux/mozilla quicktime equivalent plugin? > > apple has no linux (or unix) version listed at > > > (OT - what is apple doing about OS-X and quicktime?) > there is a plugin that lets you run windows plugins

COPY ANY DVD MOVIE FOR FREE!

COPY ANY DVD MOVIE! With our revolutionary software you can copy virtually any DVD Movie using your existing equipment!  Conventional DVD copying equipment can cost thousands of $$ Our DVD Wizard cost less than the price of 2 DVD Movies!  Free Live

Re: Mozilla 1.0: JTK/Hixie performance criteria suggestions?

Gervase Markham wrote: [snip] > > The goals of our performance criteria are for a user who switches from > > the at-that-point current version of IE to the Mozilla 1.0 build to > > not experience a regression in performance that is greater than a > > factor of two. (Ideally, of course, there wou

Re: "Time bomb version" message, what is it ?

Ian Davey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Are you sure they're not running the 6.1 preview release? That one pops >>up that message and they'll need to upgrade to 6.2 in that case. David REY wrote: > Yes, I called and it should be the 6.1. Thank you very much for your > very quick help to both of y

Re: Buggy Mozilla/Software Need Auto-Save in Email

Sam S. Onite wrote: > I prefer mozilla, eventhough it's a work in progress and things still > need to be worked on. Still a great browser. > > Since mozilla has a tendency to crash at unknown times, would it be > possible to include an email auto-save? This is already in bugzilla http://bug

Re: Accessing new tabs in javascript

Geraint Edwards wrote: > Having done some investigation I cannot find a way to create a new tab > from javascript within a web page - i.e. the tab equivalent of window.open. > > Looking at the js code in the chrome I belive I require access to the > chrome "content" element in order to add the

Re: favicon

On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 09:09:21AM -0500, Mike Cramer wrote: > It's amazing how much anger this feature is generating. Particularly > since it amounts to giving content providers *MORE* control over the > presentation of their content than HTML allows directly without breaking > HTML, HTTP, or

Re: Please check this site

Ole Kasper Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 26 Nov 2001: > Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote: > >> 2 seconds flat downloading the opening page with Communicator >> 4.7.9 and 384K DSL Connection. > > 0.5 second flat downloading the opening page with

Info package and locations

Stop Searching And Start Earning Begin The Winter Of 2001 With distributorships in your area readily available. Lifetime opportunity with the hottest business development program in the US! Locations going quickly Contact us now, to see if your area is available. For A Free Investment P

Re: favicon

Mike Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 26 Nov 2001: > 4) The debate has nothing to do with web standards, because both > favicon.ico and tags are valid no matter how you slice them. You are completely wrong. is a valid web standard. Auto fet

Re: New Features Wanted

Robert Zaichkowski wrote: > Good evening! > > For Netscape 6.x and Mozilla 0.9.x, I have come up with the demand for > the following features : > > 1. ActiveX support > IIRC this has been considered several times (I think they even got a version working in Netscape 4.0) but it has been rejec

Re: favicon

Jason Bassford wrote: >I don't think anybody is getting angry over the tag, which > only produces traffic when the Web designer wants it. The objection > is over the default use of the client asking for favicon.ico which may > or may not exist. Don't worry, I know exactly what people have

Re: about:whatever

barney wrote: > Is there a list somewhere that gives all the valid about:stuff? > I've come across a couple in these ngs that I never would have > accidentally stumbled on myself, but it would be nice to know what else > there might be that would be handy. So far: > > about:(mozilla) I assume

quicktime

is there a linux/mozilla quicktime equivalent plugin? apple has no linux (or unix) version listed at (OT - what is apple doing about OS-X and quicktime?)

Re: favicon

> It's amazing how much anger this feature is generating. Particularly > since it amounts to giving content providers *MORE* control over the > presentation of their content than HTML allows directly without breaking > HTML, HTTP, or anything else. I don't think anybody is getting angry ove

Re: New Features Wanted

Jonathan Wilson wrote: > > > 1. ActiveX support > > > > Why? There are certain web sites that can only be viewed by Internet > > Explorer 4.0 and higher. And this can be a real big inconvenience for > > those who really loathe IE such as myself and over 40 million others! > > That way, we can

Re: New Features Wanted

Jonathan Wilson wrote: > > > 1. ActiveX support > > > > Why? There are certain web sites that can only be viewed by Internet > > Explorer 4.0 and higher. And this can be a real big inconvenience for > > those who really loathe IE such as myself and over 40 million others! > > That way, we can

Re: New Features Wanted

Robert Zaichkowski wrote: > > Good evening! > > For Netscape 6.x and Mozilla 0.9.x, I have come up with the demand for > the following features : > > 1. ActiveX support NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! No other comments will be given by me wait for Garth or ASA to reply to findout why. > > Why?

Re: Problems with Mozilla 0.9.6 and Java

On 11/26/01 09:28 AM, Steen Kastoft Hansen wrote: > Could somebody please post a detailed description of how to make Java > 1.3.1 work with Mozilla 0.9.6? > > With all Mozillas I had problems but with Mozilla 0.9.2 I upgraded > to Java 1.3.1 at the same time and at last I had a Java Plugin t

Re: Buggy Mozilla/Software Need Auto-Save in Email

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Zack Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Almost all software crashes at times that are "unknown", meaning that > > it is an unexpected event. Mozilla milestone builds rarely ever crash > > on my system, especially the mail client. > > Mozilla's stability is differ

Re: Please check this site

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote: > 2 seconds flat downloading the opening page with Communicator 4.7.9 and > 384K DSL Connection. 0.5 second flat downloading the opening page with Moz 2001112508 and 2048Kbps ADSL Connection. ;) -- Ole Kasper Olsen | http://home.enitel.no/olekolsen/

Re: Please check this site

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote: > 2 seconds flat downloading the opening page with Communicator 4.7.9 and > 384K DSL Connection. 0.5 second falt downloading the opening page with Moz 2001112508 and 2049 ADSL Connection. ;) -- Ole Kasper Olsen | http://home.enitel.no/olekolsen/

Re: Problems with Mozilla 0.9.6 and Java

Steen Kastoft Hansen wrote: > Could somebody please post a detailed description of how to make > Java 1.3.1 work with Mozilla 0.9.6? This works for me: o Install the Java 1.3.1-package. o Use explorer to navigate to the directory you installed to (usually \program files\javasoft\jre\1.3.1\ o

Info package and locations

Stop Searching And Start Earning Begin The Winter Of 2001 With distributorships in your area readily available. Lifetime opportunity with the hottest business development program in the US! Locations going quickly Contact us now, to see if your area is available. For A Free Investment P

Re: Please check this site

Gord McFee wrote: > > On 11/25/01 4:31 PM, WDA wrote: > > > When I go to www.weathergraphics.com, Mozilla Build ID: 200808 will > > not finish loading the page. Will someone try to open this page and > > give me some feed back. I'm using the Windows version under Windows XP. > > Worked h

Re: Netscape 6.2 CCK & AOL

Mr. Jahn, Thanks, I will try those groups! "Christopher Jahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > And it came to pass that John wrote: > > > I work for an ISP and am considering using Netscape 6.2 for > > distribution to our customers. Netscape h

Re: Problems with Mozilla 0.9.6 and Java

Steen Kastoft Hansen wrote: > Could somebody please post a detailed description of how to make > Java 1.3.1 work with Mozilla 0.9.6? There's a file you need to copy to your plugins folder *from the fresh version of Java's directory*. The instructions are on the Release Notes page under Known

Re: favicon

Jonas Jørgensen wrote: > Wrong. Getting *MORE* control with doesn't break > HTML, HTTP, or anything else. Not wrong, just also correct. Neither favicon.ico and are wrong and both have advantages. But only one suffers from the invented-by-Microsoft syndrome. --Mike

Re: Netscape 6.2 CCK & AOL

And it came to pass that John wrote: > I work for an ISP and am considering using Netscape 6.2 for > distribution to our customers. Netscape has a CCK > (Customization Kit) which I have been experimenting with. > I am writing here because Netscape has not responded to my > emails, which is no

Re: favicon

Mike Cramer wrote: > > CaT wrote: > > > Why should he have to? I thought the point to Mozilla (or at least one > > of them) was to NOT make a broken client. A client that requests > > something other then what is on a webpage is broken. > > If you are talking about an HTTP client, I don't think

testing scrollbar(s) state ???

THIS OUGHT TO BE SIMPLE but can anyone figure out a GENERAL method of determining which scrollbars are currently displayed. ( active) (document.height and width properties are not appropriate for xml documents and computed style assumes you know the root tag) It appears that pageYOffset and pa

Netscape 6.2 CCK & AOL

I work for an ISP and am considering using Netscape 6.2 for distribution to our customers. Netscape has a CCK (Customization Kit) which I have been experimenting with. I am writing here because Netscape has not responded to my emails, which is not surprising because they never have before. Th

Re: "Time bomb version" message, what is it ?

On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:24:32 +, Ian Davey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The window say this : >> >> "Time bomb version >> This version has expired. You must download a newer version at >> http://www.mozilla.org"; >> >Are you sure they're not running the 6.1 preview release? That one pops >

Re: Cannot install on Slackware 8.0

You mean the full package (10Mb) or the source (35Mb) ??? Even the full package won't install, with the same error... In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "mAineAc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I use slackware 8.0 also. I just downloaded the mozilla program. I > didn't download the installer. > > m

Re: "Time bomb version" message, what is it ?

David REY wrote: > Hello, > > Some of my customers (using Netscape) have a pop up windows when they > start Netscape. > > The window say this : > > "Time bomb version > This version has expired. You must download a newer version at > http://www.mozilla.org"; > > What should I do ? I really do

Re: mail formatting problem

Esber wrote: > Could anyone plese help me.  I have been looking for a job.  My resume > is in microsoft word 97 format or .doc.  Some companies are hesitant to > open attachments.  My resume has all the nice formatting.  But when I > paste it ti nestscape messenger new message, it all goes funny.

Mozilla 0.9.6 crashes in message filter editor

There are several ways to crash the message filter editor. They are pretty much reproducible. (Mozilla 0.9.6 Build ID 2001112009 on Win98) The first way to crash: 1. Start mailnews. The header "Mozilla Mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED]" appears in the big window. 2. Select "Advanced features: create

Re: mail.yahoo.com signin link doesn't work

And it came to pass that mAineAc wrote: > >> >> Did you install PSM? >> > > > What's PSM? > > Personal Security Module. -- }:-) Christopher Jahn {:-( Dionysian Reveler Give a monkey a brain and he'll swear he's the center of the universe. To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom

Re: Cannot install on Slackware 8.0

Nicolas Laplante wrote: > I downloaded the new Mozilla 0.9.6 net installer today. > > The process was going well, then I got this error message: > > "Fatal Error [-618] : Couldn't open xpistub library." > > I then downloaded the complete installer, and I get the same result. > > Anyone can he

Re: mail.yahoo.com signin link doesn't work

> > Did you install PSM? > What's PSM?

Re: Buggy Mozilla/Software Need Auto-Save in Email

Zack Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Almost all software crashes at times that are "unknown", meaning that > it is an unexpected event. Mozilla milestone builds rarely ever crash > on my system, especially the mail client. Mozilla's stability is different on different platforms, and the orig

Re: Uninstall N6.2

And it came to pass that A. A. P. wrote: > I used Control Panel's Add/Remove program to uninstall N6.2 > but all the Mozilla folders still exist. > > Can I erase them manually to have a clean system for a > virgin re-install of N6.2? > Those are only your preferences, mail, bookmarks and addr

Re: Fonts problem in 0.9.6

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Benjamin Wiegert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Yup, I've noticed that also! >But, I also noticed this, which still makes me think it's Mozillas fault: >Goto Mozillas HTML-editor, and check out the sourcecode-edit-tab. >In there I get these tiny unreadable fonts also

Re: How to import Communicator 4.7 Mails into Netscape6.2

And it came to pass that Robert Zaichkowski wrote: > Christopher Jahn wrote: > >> And it came to pass that Harry Krause wrote: >> >> >>>dman84 wrote: >>> Christopher Jahn wrote: >And it came to pass that George Tan wrote: > > > >>Hi, Im trying means to import

"Time bomb version" message, what is it ?

Hello, Some of my customers (using Netscape) have a pop up windows when they start Netscape. The window say this : "Time bomb version This version has expired. You must download a newer version at http://www.mozilla.org"; What should I do ? I really don't know what is this "Time bomb program".

Re: "Time bomb version" message, what is it ?

On 11/26/2001 4:04 PM, David REY wrote: > Hello, > > Some of my customers (using Netscape) have a pop up windows when they > start Netscape. > > The window say this : > > "Time bomb version > This version has expired. You must download a newer version at > http://www.mozilla.org"; > > What should

Problems with Mozilla 0.9.6 and Java

Could somebody please post a detailed description of how to make Java 1.3.1 work with Mozilla 0.9.6? With all Mozillas I had problems but with Mozilla 0.9.2 I upgraded to Java 1.3.1 at the same time and at last I had a Java Plugin that worked! However, I felt that I should not be too much backlev

Re: favicon

CaT wrote: > Why should he have to? I thought the point to Mozilla (or at least one > of them) was to NOT make a broken client. A client that requests > something other then what is on a webpage is broken. If you are talking about an HTTP client, I don't think that is true. I don't think you'l

Re: *bold* not working in recent nightly

Peter Lairo wrote: > Strange, I can see *bold* text in the newsgroups, but not in mail I > received :( OK, I just selected *options-format-plain text only* and sent another test mail. This time it worked. It sais "autodetect" by default, so when i sent myself a mail with only the text "*bol

Re: *bold* not working in recent nightly

Peter Lairo wrote: > Hi, > > for some reason formatted text is not displaying correctly in > 2001-11-25, winNT. > > When I send myself a message with formatting (e.g., *bold* ), the > received text is not made *bold*. Strange, I can see *bold* text in the newsgroups, but not in mail I rece

Accessing new tabs in javascript

Having done some investigation I cannot find a way to create a new tab from javascript within a web page - i.e. the tab equivalent of window.open. Looking at the js code in the chrome I belive I require access to the chrome "content" element in order to add the tab. Have I missed something?

Re: Themes ?? Where??

nf wrote: > Where else can one get themes for Netscape 6.2/Mozilla? > > The "Theme Park" has a whopping *3* themes on it. There has GOT to be > more, no? > Yes, but not much. As the theme format keeps changing most authors just gave up. However, check out : http://www.geocities.com/alfredka

Outliner bookmark manager ?

Hello, I've seen that soon an outliner release of the Address book will appear in the nighties, and I was wondering if an outliner release of the bookmark manager is expected also to be released ? (http://komodo.mozilla.org/planning/branches.cgi) David.

[광고] 유용한 정보입니다!!!

Re: New Features Wanted

Robert Zaichkowski wrote: > Good evening! > > For Netscape 6.x and Mozilla 0.9.x, I have come up with the demand for > the following features : > This is just what MS wants - Mozilla locked in a race to "keep up" with IE.

Re: New Features Wanted

Jonathan Wilson wrote: >> 1. ActiveX support >> >> Why? There are certain web sites that can only be viewed by Internet >> Explorer 4.0 and higher. And this can be a real big inconvenience for >> those who really loathe IE such as myself and over 40 million others! >> That way, we can tear down

Re: *bold* not working in recent nightly

yeah, stuff that was working and now not.. we should check to see if any backouts or changes were made, cause it seems like stuff that was working before is broke. Luke wrote: > Peter Lairo wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> for some reason formatted text is not displaying correctly in >> 2001-11-25, win

Re: *bold* not working in recent nightly

Peter Lairo wrote: > Hi, > > for some reason formatted text is not displaying correctly in > 2001-11-25, winNT. > > When I send myself a message with formatting (e.g., *bold* ), the > received text is not made *bold*. > > Am i the only one having this problem or is it a regression bug? > >

*bold* not working in recent nightly

Hi, for some reason formatted text is not displaying correctly in 2001-11-25, winNT. When I send myself a message with formatting (e.g., *bold* ), the received text is not made *bold*. Am i the only one having this problem or is it a regression bug? Any tips on how to fix it (if it's only me

Re: Simple things (visual, usability bugs) ?

Andrew Backer wrote: > *3. WHY! Why Ctrl-Sift-L to open a web location, and ctrl-o > to open a normal file? I can't think of one time *ever* that I have > wanted to open a file from inside mozilla/ie/opera/etc... but about 20 > times a browsing session i would like to ctrl-o->www.nothi

Re: Simple things (visual, usability bugs) ?

its called polish and patch-maker fixable bugs.. not high priority till 0.9.9 or 0.9.10 probably. -dman84 Andrew Backer wrote: > > 1. When i type something into the location bar, it pops up a > list of locations that match (As it should). The problem is that this > list will exp

Re: Simple things (visual, usability bugs) ?

I demand that Andrew Backer may or may not have written... >2. In the list boxes inside preferences (those with 2 colums), the grid seperating >the data cells does not match up with the header cells. The column divider is offset >to the left by a few pixels. > I find this annoying as well. I

Re: Is Mozilla Mail still broken/unusable?

I demand that Peter Lairo may or may not have written... > What build are you using? To answer this question I find the user_pref("mailnews.headers.showUserAgent", true); to be very useful. The answer was 20011121. > Did you use a different build earlier this week? Yes. > Are you using wind

mail formatting problem

Could anyone plese help me.  I have been looking for a job.  My resume is in microsoft word 97 format or .doc.  Some companies are hesitant to open attachments.  My resume has all the nice formatting.  But when I paste it ti nestscape messenger new message, it all goes funny.  How do I copy my wor

Re: Themes ?? Where??

On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:25:18 +0800, nf wrote: > Where else can one get themes for Netscape 6.2/Mozilla? > > The "Theme Park" has a whopping *3* themes on it. There has GOT to be > more, no? > Try themes.org:- http://www.themes.org/skins/mozilla/ http://alpha.themes.org/skins/mozilla/ Not much

Re: Fonts problem in 0.9.6

Hmmm, your right on that one - well at least on a web page you can do Ctrl and + to make the fonts bigger or Ctrl and - to make them smaller. Obviously in the html-source-view is not controlled by the font preferences. Paul Benjamin Wiegert wrote: > Yup, I've noticed that also! > But, I also

Re: XUL and RDF local ressources ?

you could add a netscape.security.PrivilegeManager.enablePrivilege('UniversalBrowserRead'); See more perms in mozilla/caps/src/nsScriptSecurityManager.cpp Axel

Re: Is Mozilla Mail still broken/unusable?

Dave Roberts wrote: > I've downloaded the latest nightlies for the past 3 days. I've had no > problems accessing my IMAP mailbox. I'm running Win NT4. Thanks Dave, I'll give the nightlies a try today (crosses findgers). -- Regards, Peter Lairo

Simple things (visual, usability bugs) ?

list of locations that match (As it should). The problem is that this list will expand horizontally to take up the entire screen width based on the length of the url. This is very unsightly and annoying, what with the popping back and forth of the width, etc. 2. In the list boxes insid

Rates Have Fallen Again! 5.85% Fixed Rate Mortgage

Title: 5.85% Fixed Rate 5.85% Fixed Rate Rates Have Fallen Again!!! DO NOT MISS OUT!! LET BANKS COMPETE FOR YOUR BUSINESS!!! ALL CREDIT WELCOME CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO    

Re: Uninstall N6.2

On 11/26/2001 3:07 AM, A. A. P. wrote: > I used Control Panel's Add/Remove program to uninstall N6.2 but all the > Mozilla folders still exist. > > Can I erase them manually to have a clean system for a virgin re-install of > N6.2? Yes you can. But remember that your Windows\Mozilla folder (o

Re: Buggy Mozilla/Software Need Auto-Save in Email

On 11/26/2001 1:34 AM, Sam S. Onite wrote: > I prefer mozilla, eventhough it's a work in progress and things still > need to be worked on. Still a great browser. > > Since mozilla has a tendency to crash at unknown times, would it be > possible to include an email auto-save? > > Crashing du

Uninstall N6.2

I used Control Panel's Add/Remove program to uninstall N6.2 but all the Mozilla folders still exist. Can I erase them manually to have a clean system for a virgin re-install of N6.2? What registry files need to be removed too? Thanks, A

Re: Mozilla starts instead of Netscape!

Hi Michael, Thanks for the relpy. /etc/alternatives is correct. Netscape runs fine by itself (i.e no mozilla running)... I believe netscape first checks if an existing copy of itself is in memory and if so, it just spawns a new browser window. It looks as though netscape is mistaking mozilla a