basic wrote:
firstly, don't install over older builds. Either install it in its own
dir or remove the older build and install the newer.
basic
OK, I tried that, and 0.9.8 works fine for me now. Never mind...
Thanks!
- Chuck
basic wrote:
firstly, don't install over older builds. Either install it in its own
dir or remove the older build and install the newer.
basic
OK, I tried that, and 0.9.8 works fine for me now. Never mind...
Thanks!
- Chuck
basic wrote:
...
Alternatively backup of all your profiles (including the registry.dat
file).
Where is the registry.dat file? How does Mozilla know about it? I
uninstalled 0.9.7, then installed 0.9.8. Somehow, 0.9.8 knew about my
old profiles. I'm assuming the location of my profiles
I just tried installing 0.9.8 on my Win2k machine -- over 0.9.7. When
it ran 0.9.8 for the first time, it put up a blank (all gray) window,
covering the entire screen. I tried starting it a few times, with the
same result. I tried rebooting and starting -- same result. I then
tried
Matthew Thomas wrote:
Chuck Messenger wrote:
Supporting open standards works against that
goal. If there's such a groundswell that they're _forced_ to, only
then will they support open standards.
Um, duh, that's what `implementing the Internet standards that make
Matthew Thomas wrote:
DeMoN LaG wrote:
Q. Is Internet Explorer committed to implementing standard X in the
future?
A. Microsoft is committed to implementing the Internet standards that
make sense to allow our customers to build great solutions. As
standards emerge, we evaluate them to see
Bill Lee wrote:
Alan Hunter wrote:
a spell checer in Mozilla.
Mozilla is not for 'end users' and won't have these kinds of extras.
That's where Netscape comes in.
While you can ask for things like password protected profiles and
right click on image and save as wallpaper, something
DeMoN LaG wrote:
Q. Is Internet Explorer committed to implementing standard X in the
future?
A. Microsoft is committed to implementing the Internet standards that
make sense to allow our customers to build great solutions. As standards
emerge, we evaluate them to see which
DeMoN LaG wrote:
Q. Is Internet Explorer committed to implementing standard X in the
future?
A. Microsoft is committed to implementing the Internet standards that
make sense to allow our customers to build great solutions. As standards
emerge, we evaluate them to see which
DeMoN LaG wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 17 Dec 2001:
No, both you guys are WackedV. You're going to make fun of IE6
in the areas of speed and stability, two metrics by which IE6
inarguably beats the living crappola out of Mozilla?
D. Alvarado wrote:
Hi,
I am running on a Win2000 machine. Every time I try and build I
fail with a 'cat' is not recognized as an internal or external
symbol, command, or batch file error. I tried searching my system
and I can't find a cat.exe or cat.bat program, which leads me to
Malodushnikh wrote:
If Mozilla.org acknowledges this as a problem and removes it to placate
the far-right hard-liner political views of a few reactionary nuts, then
I will undo everything I've ever contributed to the project.
Sounds reactionary.
- Chuck
Christian Biesinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
This is a much more up-to-date version of the string guide:
http://www.melez.com/stringdoc/string-guide.html
Great -- thanks!
It would be helpful for newbies such as myself if this doc were
Help! (please...!)
I've just started delving into the Mozilla framework -- a treasure!
Anyway, I'm striving to make sense of the string classes. The only existing
docs consist largely of old email messages, which themselves refer to things
which are planned (and presumably implemented by
14 matches
Mail list logo
