Klaus Krtschil wrote:
the following code is not working with Mozilla:
map name=Tes t
area shape=CIRCLE coords=57,24,7 href=http://www.mozilla.org;
target=_new
/map
hr
img src=http://www.mozilla.org/images/mozilla-banner.gif; width=600
height=58 border=0 alt= usemap=#Tes t
This is
Michael Jakob wrote:
* Does the idea of using file:... links relative to a http:...
document make sense at all? (remember, I can assume that the files
exist on all machines from where my document can be accessed!)
* If it does, shouldn't this be supported consistently by Mozilla
(i.e.,
Bill Jonas wrote:
handler event=keypress keycode=VK_BACK_SPACE command=cmd_scrollPageUp /
The keycode is VK_BACK without _SPACE, although we have
DOM_VK_BACK_SPACE.
Clarence
Greg Nee wrote:
If this isn't going to be fixed in the general release, can somebody at
least instruct me how to map a single key to the back function?
I've made a XPI that restores the old behavior:
http://clarence.de/tests/BackspaceGoesBack.xpi
But I'd still prefer to have this in
Gervase Markham wrote:
Boban Jelica wrote:
Hi all.
I would like my Mozilla to go back one page when I press Backspace.
That's all I wish. I use Opera a lot (50/50 with mozilla) where I can
use Backspace...
This was taken out because it's too easy for people editing a web form
to
Shawn Neumann wrote:
I've notice a difference between the way IE 6.0 anc Mozilla deal with
CSS divs and I'm wondering which is correct in terms of the standard.
If you set a div to have a width of 150px and then give it a right
border of 5px this is what results:
Mozilla: Created a
aleph-zero wrote:
I was hoping someone could tell me what I'm doing wrong. I'm putting a image
inside a table cell and I want the table cell to collapse so it only
contains the image:
table cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 border=0
tr
td bgcolor=redimg
Chris Hoess wrote:
As Garth commented,
we should be stripping whitespace from CDATA attributes, but I don't think
we do this yet.
We strip '\t', '\n' and '\r', but no spaces. Additionally we
strip '\b', which is wrongly treated as whitespace at many
places in Mozilla. Does anybody know why
Zavier Sheran wrote:
I have a website at http://www.gar.or.cr
The blue main menu consists of 5 images. It displays
well on other browsers (IE5 Mac PC, iCab) but in
NN6.1 (latest) it falls slightly apart...
Any ideas why?
Because it uses images in table cells for layout, but has
a
JSA wrote:
Right-clicking is busted in the latest nightly (build 2001081208). Also,
auto-completion has been broken on the trunk for about a week. Has anyone
else noticed?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990
Clarence
A.Pesch wrote:
In one of my pages, I got a link which passes on values to a CGI
script.
The values have to be inserted between quotation marks, so the HTML
sourcecode looks like
.../cgi-bin/tnvbw_anf.pl?B_W=B_WzOrt=#34;Stuttgart#34;...
or
Steve wrote:
I was trying to do a regular expression search on some HTML based on
Mozilla's View Source, and it just wouldn't work.
I downloaded the file to my machine and opened it up with a text
editor. I saw that what showed up as foo in Mozilla's View Source was
actually FOO on the
Dave Huang wrote:
Seems to me that Mozilla can be a bit too picky about HTML... in
particular, see http://www.azeotrope.org/~khym/moztest.html
It's a bunch of lines like:
font size=2somethingbr
font size=2something elsebr
etc...
There are 200 lines like that, but Mozilla only shows the
FT Rathore wrote:
I have been trying to figure this out for a while, why does mozilla gunzip
my .gz files on the fly while leaving the .gz extension in place. This can
be very annoying because all my .gz file (even though they appear gzipped
by extension) are not gzippped. The behavoir has
Ashant wrote:
Recently when mozilla crashed on my windows machine, I sent a talkback
report that was automatically generated. What happens to these things?
Do they get filed as bugs? How do I find out what happened to my
report?
If a similar crash has been reported several times, you can
wingnut wrote:
Hi! I've been fiddlin' with using a JS timer to change the background
colors of style attributes. The page I'm working on is at...
http://www.winternet.com/~wingnut/html/test/test_J1.htm
(better use Moz .9.2 or something in that class)
If any of you experts are bored,
Bill Lee wrote:
First, please don't say you're not supposed to layout pages with tables.
The entire web does it.
You are not supposed to do it if you use XHTML or HTML 4
strict. You can still do it, but then you must explicitly
say that you want such behavior, e.g. with
IMG { display:
rob wrote:
We've been experimenting here with XHTML transitional code and we're
continually finding extra space around elements, particularly images
which are laid out horizontally in TD's, etc.
See http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22274
(resolved invalid).
Clarence
Is http://www.mozilla.org.uk/newsgroups.txt obsolete? At
http://developer.netscape.com/evangelism/docs/articles/updating-dhtml-web-pages/#feedback
this newsgroups for additional information about client-side
browser development using web standards and Netscape technologies
are listed:
*
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
well it can't be completely down... I'm reading this via
secnews.netscape.com
You must have got it when they were preforming a test. because I tried
just a few minutes ago and received messge that the server was not
accepting
Mark wrote:
The directory is not accessible, but it looks like there may be
a Netscape 6.1 before 6.5. Who knows!
I have seen the name 6.1 in some bugs, and
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said 6.TBA.
Application name for talkback in 0.9.1 is Netscape6.10B1 .
Clarence
Erich wrote:
The recommended x86-Linux Talkback-enbled Installer for Moz0.9.1 currently available
on mozilla.org downloads as .tar.gz, but is in fact not gzipped. You might want to
fix that soon...
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35956
Clarence
Jay Garcia wrote:
I get Sorry, access to the port number given has been disabled for
security reasons
That's the new behavior. Try with a build from a few days ago.
Clarence
Rip Toren wrote:
The connection goes either to the outside world, or localhost. How about
a security popup (and associated preference settings (allow, question,
deny)) concerning connection to the local host (localhost,
127.0.0.1,myIP,etc). Then the user would be in some control when a page
Eyes to the Skies. wrote:
In build 2001060708 of linux, the browser scrollbar appears to be
misbehaving. See the attached graphic. Notice the middle of the 'grab'
bar with the horizontal lines, but there is no lower border. There is
also no upper border if i scroll
down. It can still be
Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
A fix was committed for 83401 into the Mozilla tree. I'm looking at the
diffs and it looks like this will prevent Mozilla from contacting an HTTP
server that listens on a well known port other than 80, such as 25 or 389.
What business is it of Mozilla's that my
Rip Toren wrote:
To be blunt, a problems for whom? Mozilla parsing problems, or for the
server working on the other end of the connection?
Spammers could use it to send spam with other people's
IP address.
Clarence
Rip Toren wrote:
OK
I am trying to get a grip on this.
The spammer uses this magic URL in his browser. The browser connects to
'host' at port 25, while expecting to implement an FTP login. The remote
server picks up the 'SMTP commands here' and the envokes sendmail to
send some
K wrote:
I am using Mozilla 0.9 5-13 built. Each time I go eBay (www.ebay.com)
then go my eBay section, and the browser request to download a
eBayISAPL.dll file.
Anybody has the same experience? How to solve? Thanks.
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80544
Chris Ivey wrote:
Any page after the index will break for me. I isolated the cause as the
Object tags used to embed the Flash movies. If I remove them, the page
displays fine. If I leave them in, the Flash Movies, and any other
content not displayed in a layer with a position:absolute
Mark Anderson wrote:
"Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
There's a bigger issue here. Who do we respect more? Old and broken
browsers, or W3C and other internet standards (such as RFCs)? If we "find
a meaning" for this sort of broken URL, what else should
Roland Mainz wrote:
Noone prevents you from creating a "tracker" bug...
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68427
Clarence
James Akula wrote:
I assume it's delayed. No big deal if it incorporates all the new
enhancements but gets rid of recent regressions and instabilities (the
latest nightlies have all been hit or miss). Can someone inside the
project let the rest of know when to check back for it?
See
Christian Mattar wrote:
1. Usability
1.1 When the user follows a link to a target anchor, highlight the
target location.
Techniques:
Put the target location at a consistent location in the viewport (e.g.,
at the top of a graphical viewport). Allow configuration to highlight
I
34 matches
Mail list logo
