Gervase Markham wrote:
But Netscape 6.2.1 works perfectly well with touchpad's virtual
scrolling.
Again, this is only dimly remembered, but I _think_ they implemented a
hack to have an invisible native scrollbar for the driver to recognise.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the man to ask about
Mozilla responds to a wheel mouse as expected. However, using a touchpad
with virtual scrolling, there is no response in mozilla, though all
other programs seem to respond well. Is this a known problem?
BTW - Toshiba satellite 5000-S507, Windows XP professional, synaptics
touchpad with
Anonymous wrote:
Business 2.0's Erick Shonfeld (better known as Future Boy) has
posted a story nailing AOL Time Warner - the parent company of his
employer - as only keeping Netscape alive so they could file a lawsuit
against Microsoft. Here is a link to check it out:
DeMoN LaG wrote:
Q. Is Internet Explorer committed to implementing standard X in the
future?
A. Microsoft is committed to implementing the Internet standards that
make sense to allow our customers to build great solutions. As standards
emerge, we evaluate them to see which
Bert Garcia wrote:
I'm running 0.9.7 2001122106 from today's nightly folder, I'm on a
Windows 98se machine. So far so good, it seems quicker than 0.9.6, the
mousewheel scrolling has been vastly improved.
Any news as to when 0.9.7 will be official?
Look again. Its out.
WDA wrote:
Using WindowsXP, can someone tell me how to get my DUN to automatically
dial, when I select the Mozilla icon? If you know, be exact. Your time
and knowledge is appreciated.
I haven't tried XP (and have no desire to), but I understand it is just
Windows 2000 with some window
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A number of posts, but no one seems to have an answer.
All programs which access the internet via a dialup will execute the
autodial and log on EXCEPT Netscape.
WHY???
Netscape 6.2
Win 2K
But it seems like it happens with other OS and versions of Netscape.
Andreas J. wrote:
Hi folks.
i loaded this site in IE and in Mozilla
http://www.sport1.de/coremedia/generator/www.sport1.de/Main.html
in mozilla it is not displayed right
is the site coded bad or is it mozilla's fault???
greetings, Andi
Hard to say. If I try to view the source,
Wolfram Mörtel wrote:
Hallo,
since I subscribed this list, I dayly get about 50 emails. Thats still
more than enougth.
Please would you unsubscribe me now.
Non of received emails contains an address to do that myself, so I see
my only chance this way
Thank
Bharat Kumar wrote:
There are a number of sites that refuse access by Mozilla, and I know
there's
some evangelism stuff going on in mozilla.org but I haven't really
followed it.
If I come across some well known site that doesn't allow Mozilla, should
I open
a separate bug for it? Or
kchayka wrote:
I just discovered (the hard way) that a patch for
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46225 was checked in on
11/19. My pages, which all pass strict validation, ain't got no styles
anymore. :-( Turns out the hosting service has .css files defined as a
content type
to change the MIME type first.
The whole point of strict validation is that it only works if everything
is right, so really your pages (on that server) never did really
validate as CSS.
Jerry Park wrote:
My host, until recently (yahoo) was using the wrong mime type. I asked
them
JTK wrote:
ZZT wrote:
Hello,
somewhere I read, that mozilla can be configured so. Is that correct?
bye
Don't bother: Use the Proxomitron (http://proxomitron.org/). Blocks
*every* kind of crappy ad that comes your way (banners, popups,
whatever), and only extremely rarely will
jdavis wrote:
http://www.abit-usa.com/
Immediately the browser pretty much freezes though the page continues to
load and finishes loading, but no interaction is possible after.
This is an important page to me... can anyone take a look?
Regards.
Works fine here -- mozilla 0.9.6
Ian Thomas wrote:
Support for IE-style 'favicons' next to bookmarks will shortly be added
to Mozilla, as a result of bug
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32087
There are two ways for selecting the correct favicon
1) Using the icon specified in the relevant LINK tag in the
Geraint Edwards wrote:
If anyone is curious - the formating problem appears to be the result of
the absence of a DOCTYPE tag. Saving the file locally and adding a
standard 4.0 Transitional tag makes the page nicely formatted.
Right. The page is not compliant with standards. Surprise!
Random Liegh wrote:
Albert wrote:
ahmetaa wrote:
According to news.com,
posibly you've already heard, msn does not work with no browser but
IE now.
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-7655334.html?tag=mn_hd
Look at http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97222. They're
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
Can you download AOL IM seperatly from netscape and then install it on a
system with mozilla?
Of course.
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
This is not related to Mozilla, but I feel that it affects all web
developers.
The World Wide Web Consortium has always been promoting free and open
standards. But now they are considering to recommend standards that are
based on patented technologies, meaning that
Jason Fleshman wrote:
No problems at all using 20010807. I get an e-mail full of ?s because
I don't have the correct language pack, but it displays fine. Maybe
it's something recent that's crept in?
--Jason
Ben Ruppel wrote:
Yep, me too.
Stephen Moehle wrote:
Am I the only one
Erik Harris wrote:
I can't get my copy of Mozilla 0.923 (latest release version) to work on most
forms on the net. I can't log into Hotmail, I can't log into USAir's
Dividend Miles stuff, I can't submit an item to sell on eBay, and who knows
how many other things. What is wrong?
On a
Ranjit Mathew wrote:
Hi,
Of late, I've been installing the various Mozilla
stable releases (0.9.1, 0.9.2, etc.) and, needless to
say, have been VERY impressed with it - it's my default
browser for almost everything except for brain-dead
sites that require me to use IE. Congratulations
Nick Richards wrote:
Jerry Park wrote:
Ranjit Mathew wrote:
Hi,
Of late, I've been installing the various Mozilla
stable releases (0.9.1, 0.9.2, etc.) and, needless to
say, have been VERY impressed with it - it's my default
browser for almost everything except for brain-dead
sites
Thomas wrote:
Hi, i just noticed something strange...it happens with Moz and IE
see this testcase (it's a simplified DOM sample from mozilla.org I used
for testing fade stuff)
http://www.velosschrade.ch/test/testfade.html
first I thought this is some bug in Mozilla, but IE does it
Adam E. wrote:
For some time now, Mozilla has been hardwired to automatically save
all executable files (application/octet-stream). I miss the open
feauture which lets me run, for example, installation files without
going through the hassle of saving and later deleting them. Is there
any
25 matches
Mail list logo
