Re: 0.9.9: remembering passwords etc.

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Veera Venkataramani wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (hugo vanwoerkom) writes: > >> Thanks!! That answers that! >> >> Christian Biesinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... >> > hugo vanwoerkom wrote: >> > > 0.9.9 (previous versions also)

Re: Annoying Things about 0.9.9

In article , John Reyst wrote: > > > 13. and it sometimes doesn't like to stay minimized. You click minimize and > it does for a second, then comes right back to full size. Only way to fix it > is to close/restart after that. that bug is now third in the most dup

Re: Warum hat Mozilla 0.9.9 so viele neue Bugs? Ein Sabotuer?

In article , Bamm Gabriana wrote: > It is. > > Let a = 1. > a^2 = a (multiply both sides by a) > a^2 - 1 = a - 1 (subtract 1 from both sides) > (a + 1)(a - 1) = (a - 1) (factor it) ok. > (a + 1) = 1 (cancel common factors) whoops... a-1 is 0, so you've just divided bo

Re: Warum hat Mozilla 0.9.9 so viele neue Bugs? Ein Sabotuer?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pascal Chevrel wrote: > Thomas a dit : >> The site validates as HTML Transitional. It's Mozilla's fault. Netscape >> 6.2 does it right, Mozilla 0.9.9 not. That annoys me. This should not >> happen. > > Mozilla's fault at what ? Could you please translate what you

Re: Uploading to FTP

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, grayrest wrote: > Bamm Gabriana wrote: >>>If I dragged a file onto what to me as a user appears to be a ftp >>>program, it should upload, if I drag it onto a browser window, it should >>>display. >> >> But if the browser window displays a URL that begins with ftp:/

Re: NetScape 6.2 and HTML forms

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jonas Jørgensen wrote: > jim patriarca wrote: > >> Does anybody know why when setting action="mailto:"; in an HTML form >> NS6 launches its Email program instead of popping up the the alert box >> that says something like "you are about to send your email address >

Re: Display problem

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Thompson wrote: > Here's another display problem I'm seeing in Mozilla-0.9.9: on sites with > text flowing around images (for example http://news.bbc.co.uk ), text will > sometimes flow out of its column and overlay an adjacent image. Font size > of the tex

Re: URL completion not working

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dan Howard wrote: > I'm running 0.9.9 at home (on Win98SE) and at work (on WinNT 4.0). > At home, if I enter "cnn" in the URL field and press enter, Mozilla adds > in the "http://www."; and ".com" as it has all along (I'm a lazy typist). > At work, I get the follow

Re: bugzilla; lock symbol

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Joop wrote: [snip] > what's bothering me right now (and what i've never seen working) is this: > > when several tabs are open, some with http URLs, some with https URLs, > the lock symbol in the lower right corner is not displayed correctly, > i.e. e.g. it i

Re: mozilla 0.9.9 crashes

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, jukola wrote: > > How come Mozilla is the only programme asking for this detailed > information? it isn't. > I have never been asked to send an error report while using > Netscape or Explorer. i guess you don't have Internet Explorer's error reporting installe

Re: "Quick Launch"

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roope Lehmuslehto wrote: > Andreas R wrote: >> IE always consumes your memory, since it's integrated with Windows. >> IF you use Quick Launch, then at least it's your own choice if you want to. > > Hmm, I meant that when Quick Launch enabled, Mozilla should > force

Re: Forwarding emails with full headers as attachments

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, dman84 wrote: > When I get a forward, I dont wanna see all that crap.. I just wanna read > the mail message.. If I know who sent it to me, that is all I need to > know.. > > receiving a forward without full headers, I like that.. to me I just > scroll over all t

Re: My only minor problem with 0.9.9...

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sid Vicious wrote: > Tuukka Tolvanen wrote: >> Phil Edwards wrote: >> >>> ...is that the underlined bright blue sidebar bookmarks look like ass. >> >> >> No blue glare, no underline, no ass, nay more. >> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114142 > > Fix

Re: Killer features?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Geraint Edwards wrote: > dman84 wrote: > >>> 1. Spam avoidance. >> >> Javascript stuff is turned off by default in mail & news.. sounds like >> quite a project.. > > What I am talking about is not javascript it is html email that includes > lines to the effec

Re: back button broken (wired.com) in 0.9.9?

In article , Parish wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Also, 0.9.9 still has lots of problems in properly displaying text at many >> sites (e.g. news.bbc.co.uk). > > Example URLs? news.bbc.co.uk looks just fine to me that's odd - still rather messed up for me. the

Re: 0.9.9 and null host mappings

In article , TazMainiac wrote: [snip] > What I really want is for Mozilla to support regular expression > ad-banner blocking: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78104 that would indeed be very cool. > Of course, the nice thing about the HOSTS file is that

Re: 0.9.9 and null host mappings

In article <6xLj8.35076$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, TazMainiac wrote: > I have a HOSTS file that maps many ad servers to 0.0.0.0 > (see http://www.smartin-designs.com). > > In versions of Mozilla prior to 0.9.9, this worked wonderfully. it did? i had dialogs popping up all over the place in 0.9.7 and .

Re: is bugzilla.mozilla.org down?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Geraint Edwards wrote: > I just tried accessing bugzilla to file a new 0.9.9 bug and the server > appears to be down. Can anyone else reach the webserver? it does appear to be down, yes. i'm getting "connection refused". haven't managed to get 0.9.9 yet either -

Re: problems with hotmail "view source" mozilla 0.9.8

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Denis Perelyubskiy wrote: [snip] > > Thanks for the quick response. Other browsers also fetch the > new page for this feature. I think I might've not been > clear, sorry. By "View Source" I meant clicking on the link > present in the individual email message view i

Re: Content Type for .css files

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christian Biesinger wrote: > Jens Hatlak wrote: >> Christian Biesinger wrote: >>> However, this is only the case for pages using the strict mode. >>> It works for others, so a doctype like this can be used and the >>> stylesheet will work: >>> >>> (I hope I rememb

Re: New Skin for 1.0

In article , Bamm Gabriana wrote: >> I agree when it is released in 2003. > > The delayed release of 0.9.9 will not delay the release of 1.0 > because 0.9.9 is on a branch while 1.0 is on the trunk. The > code for each is being worked on separately. well yes, but there

Re: Blocked doubleclick adds produce "not found" errors

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ian Davey wrote: > Alex Farran wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The place where I work has blocked access to doubleclick. Now every >> time I go to a site with adverts on it I get a pop-up error telling me >> that Mozilla can't find doubleclick. I preferred the adverts! >

Re: Content Type for .css files

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sören Kuklau wrote: > > Is Netscape Online UK affiliated with AOLTW's Netscape (Netscape > Communications)? I wasn't able to find any information on a company > called "Netscape Online" located in the UK on Google. i don't believe they are offering new signups s

Re: Bugzilla and search engines

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote: >> having googling >> sucking down pretty much the entire contents of the bugzilla database at >> frequent intervals could well be a significant burden on the bugzilla >> server(s)... > > You are talking about how you think Google works.

Re: Bugzilla and search engines

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote: >>> Well if there are only seconds and no objections I think it should be >>> done. Somebody could just "rm robotx.txt"... >> This is not a good idea. Google's index of a bug would rapidly go out of >> date. > > That's not a problem, bec

Re: Mozilla Becomes Very Very Slow while display Website

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christian Biesinger wrote: > Yeh You-Ying wrote: >> But why can IE5 go through with http v1.1 in the same situation ? > > It can't. I'm 99.9% sure that MSIE always uses 1.0 for proxy servers. well it can do it, but wouldn't be doing it unless you told it to... IE

Re: Filtering / Message rules better in Outlook Express?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jonas Jørgensen wrote: > David Tenser wrote: >> Thanks for clearing this up for me! I have now successfully unjarred >> chrome (whatever that means). > > JAR files are like ZIP files. in fact, i think it is true that JAR files _are_ ZIP files. if you simply ren

Re: 0.9.8 and news.bbc.co.uk

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David King wrote: > michael lefevre wrote: >> just upgraded from 0.9.7 and now http://news.bbc.co.uk/ looks rather >> screwy (fonts too large for the spaces they are in - selecting the text >> selects the area where the text should be, n

0.9.8 and news.bbc.co.uk

just upgraded from 0.9.7 and now http://news.bbc.co.uk/ looks rather screwy (fonts too large for the spaces they are in - selecting the text selects the area where the text should be, not where it is - first page load all the news was in a large font, on reloading the page only the "around the wor

Re: Ho to masquerade Mozilla?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel R. Tobias wrote: [snip] > That's actually the approach that browser makers have been taking most > of the time when they design their user-agent strings... it's gone on > for several "generations", which is why many browsers have such > convoluted strings wit

Re: Problems sending images in email inline with Netscape.

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jonas Jørgensen wrote: > Sören Kuklau wrote: > >>> Does Mozilla add the word "Mozilla" to file type descriptions? I never >>> noticed that. I think you should file a bug. >> >> You mean stuff like "Mozilla Portable Network Graphic Image" for .png? >> Yes, it doe

Re: Is there a way to read mail as text and not HTML?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christian Biesinger wrote: > Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote: >>if you you use html if you need to emphasize a >> word, phrase, or paragraphic you can. >> to do so now in plain text I have to use "quote marks" to do so > > Well, using *asterisks* or _underlines_ (ma

Re: Toolbar Customization Spec!

after a quick query... http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49543#c77 In article , Sören Kuklau wrote: > What is the corresponding bug #, if I may ask? > > "yatsu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag > news:a22291$106b$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> http://bugzil

Re: Fetching of /favicon.ico disabled

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Hyatt wrote: > Yep. Since I doubt I'll have time to focus on the remaining bugs in the > implementation before Mozilla 1.0, it has been disabled in Mozilla and > will remain disabled for 1.0 (unless interested parties other than > myself are willing to tac

Re: HTML 4.01 Transitional Code and CSS

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris Hoess wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jens Hatlak wrote: > >> BTW: Has anyone contacted the Apache team telling them to add the >> text/css MIME type to the mime.types file by default? Or wouldn't that >> be so smart? > > Uh, my mime.types file in A