[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Jacek Piskozub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > A pity. I would like Mozilla to do better than other browser :-(
>
> I would like Mozilla to warp space and time to provide me webpages
> BEFORE I request them, but that's not going to happen either.
>...
`RFE: Mozil
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gordon Bennett wrote:
> Right, Chris - but your arguments apply to a personal firewall too. The
> only solution is not to install malicious software, especially not with
> root rights.
>
OK, or *write* your own firewall. :-) You're right, of course-if you're
r
Jacek Piskozub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A pity. I would like Mozilla to do better than other browser :-(
I would like Mozilla to warp space and time to provide me webpages BEFORE I
request them, but that's not going to happen either.
--
Brandon Hume- hume -> BOFH.Halifax.NS.Ca, http://W
Chris Hoess wrote:
> you're trying to prevent some programming running as root (I assume we're
> in a Win 9.x environment here) from getting data it wants in the system.
> Making Mozilla cleverer at hiding data is pretty clearly a stopgap
> solution; the solution is installing a personal firew
Asa Dotzler wrote:
> Every other browser you have ever installed keeps the URL in a
> native field. Mozilla isn't doing anything different from any other
> browser.
A pity. I would like Mozilla to do better than other browser :-(
Jacek
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Peter Lairo wrote:
>
> It is so easy nowadays to accidentally install software (e.g., user
> ignorance, viri, piggyback software, Micro$oft) that ANY such program
> could access the URL list in Mozilla (correct me if I'm wrong) - not
> just MediaMatrix.
So let me get this rig
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jacek Piskozub wrote:
> You can avoid writing such details in addressbook (actually I think most
> people never bothers). You cannot avoid opening URLs if you want to see
> the Web pages.
Good point. But the spyware can still slurp up the profiles directory and
Jacek Piskozub wrote:
> Chris Hoess wrote:
>
>> Except that the address book, and the information in it tying together
>> email addresses, street addresses, names, and various other personal
>> data seems like it would be just as useful a thing to snatch for
>> marketing. Shall we remove the
Chris Hoess wrote:
> Except that the address book, and the information in it tying together
> email addresses, street addresses, names, and various other personal data
> seems like it would be just as useful a thing to snatch for marketing.
> Shall we remove the address book, too? It's clear
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Lairo wrote:
> Greediy companies are not interested in formatting your hard drive or to
> whom you are sending jucy love leters - there is no profit in that.
> There IS, however, a large profit in having a *detailed analysis* of
> peoples browsing habbits.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Peter Lairo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>It is so easy nowadays to accidentally install software (e.g., user
>>ignorance, viri, piggyback software, Micro$oft) that ANY such program
>>could access the URL list in Mozilla (correct me if I'm wrong) - not
>>
>
> If yo
Peter Lairo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is so easy nowadays to accidentally install software (e.g., user
> ignorance, viri, piggyback software, Micro$oft) that ANY such program
> could access the URL list in Mozilla (correct me if I'm wrong) - not
If you're going to worry about "accidental
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Lairo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>We should seriously consider the following question:
>What benefit do we have from providing this information - at this
>potential cost?
>
Another question: "how hard is it to get the URL from Mozilla's own
widget?"
Assumin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Fri, 10 Aug 2001, Peter Lairo wrote:
>
PPS. What is important is that the *SPYWARE-ENABLING CODE* should be
removed from Mozilla.
See bug: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71270
>>>That's what's known as "scare mungering". For your informat
14 matches
Mail list logo
