Jerry Park wrote:
>
> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
>
> > I know little more about the subject since I raised the Active-X
> > question a few months ago. I was politely (and not so ) told the
> > above info though I don't remember for sure whether it was xpcom or xul
> > (believe it was xpcom)
"Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
>
> Garth Wallace wrote:
> >
> > "Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
> > >
> > > Jerry Park wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Roland wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > I would like to hear what you folks think about making mozilla capable of
> > > > > handling all Micr
Garth Wallace wrote:
>
> "Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
> >
> > Garth Wallace wrote:
> > >
> > > "Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Jerry Park wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Roland wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > I would like to hear what you folks think about makin
Garth Wallace wrote:
"Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
Actually IE for Mac has the ability to use Active-X though I have itturned off. (Have one website I have to use it for)Mozilla does support a Variation on Active-X not based on the Microsoft model.Supposedly all the dangerous code
Adam Lock wrote:
>
> Garth Wallace wrote:
>
> > "Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
> >
> >> Actually IE for Mac has the ability to use Active-X though I have
> >> it
> >> turned off. (Have one website I have to use it for)
> >> Mozilla does support a Variation on Active-X not based on the
> >> M
Garth Wallace wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
Adam Lock wrote:
Mozilla is built with XPCOM, but it is possible to host ActiveXcontrols albeit in a limited fashion using this plugin:http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/plugin.htm
Right, but that plugin isn't actually part ofMozilla. It's
Garth Wallace wrote:
> Jason Antony wrote:
>
>>Also, kindly trim quoted messages while replying
>
> I thought it was best to keep the whole
> quote so people could check back and
> verify my argument.
Yes I understand, but this is also a newsgroup [as well as a mailing
list]. Those on the la
"Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
> Garth Wallace wrote:
> snip
>
> > Don't be an ass.
>
> Not trying to be.
>
> Just admitting that there is no way I can post anything correct in your eyes.
>
> Still if both MSCOM and XPCOM are viariants of COM. And Active-X is part
> of MSCOM
>
> A
"Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
>
> Garth Wallace wrote:
> >
> > "Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
> > >
> > > Garth Wallace wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Jerry Park wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Roland wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello,
> >
Garth Wallace wrote:
[snip]
> I hope the rest of the people on this group are
> literate enough to grasp my meaning.
[snip]
At least i got the idea, Garth.
Sorry, Philip - but your kind of logic is not the one i learned at
school. Hopefully Garth is patient enough to make things clear for you.
Robert Pollak wrote:
>
> Please avoid personal attacks or offenses. In this
> case it would be better to let the thread die.
True. Also, kindly trim quoted messages while replying, like Robert did.
The news server connection is *extremely* slow, even from my uni's T1
connection. Anything ov
Garth Wallace wrote:
snip
> Don't be an ass.
Not trying to be.
Just admitting that there is no way I can post anything correct in your eyes.
Still if both MSCOM and XPCOM are viariants of COM. And Active-X is part
of MSCOM
Anyway if the subject should come up again in the future;
Robert Pollak wrote:
>
> At least i got the idea, Garth.
> Sorry, Philip - but your kind of logic is not the one i learned at
> school. Hopefully Garth is patient enough to make things clear for you.
>
> But, to both of you: Please avoid personal attacks or offenses. In this
> case it would be b
Jason Antony wrote:
>
> Also, kindly trim quoted messages while replying, like Robert did.
> The news server connection is *extremely* slow, even from my uni's T1
> connection. Anything over 80 lines and I'm better off meditating :-)
I thought it was best to keep the whole
quote so people could
daa wrote:
>
> "Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
>
> > Garth Wallace wrote:
> > snip
> >
> > > Don't be an ass.
> >
> > Not trying to be.
> >
> > Just admitting that there is no way I can post anything correct in your eyes.
> >
> > Still if both MSCOM and XPCOM are viariants of COM. And
15 matches
Mail list logo
