Ben Bucksch wrote:
Daniel Veditz wrote:
I don't think you've demonstrated problems with the policy but rather
that
we have to do a better job implementing it.
I see. I guess we have differing viewpionts. Given that we ask for
secrecy, I think that the policy should *ensure* for
On 2004-03-24, Daniel Veditz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Bucksch wrote:
I forgot:
* There are currently 36 fixed, hidden bugs. Some of them fixed a
year ago.
I will be updating the vulnerabilities page (and unhiding bugs) for the 1.7
release, I'll make sure to check the
On 2004-03-25, Daniel Veditz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We will be including Firefox and Thunderbird information on the
vulnerabilities page going forward and testing against them.
Excellent. Thanks.
--
Michael
___
Mozilla-security mailing list
Ben Bucksch wrote:
That's not fair. I wanted to issue warnings, but need the allowance of
the security group, esp. its former owner, which I practically never
got. I tried, IIRC, but ended up thinking that it's futile.
Let's forget about the AOL-burdened past. I--and the Mozilla Foundation,
Daniel Veditz wrote:
Let's forget about the AOL-burdened past. I--and the Mozilla Foundation, I'm sure--want us to do the right thing now.
Yes, I hoped so. That's exactly the reason why I posted this.
Can we start over and give the existing policy (as written, not as executed) a try for a
