Chris Sidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 32 or 44.1kHz for 128
kbit/sec mp3s fromsoundcard?
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Eric.Howgate wrote:
> > When recording from the radio via line-in Cool
Edit
>
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Eric.Howgate wrote:
> When recording from the radio via line-in Cool Edit
> shows the source as 16 bit stereo @ 32KHz.
I don't think any version of Cool Edit offers a "guessing" or "estimate
best settings" option. As another person said, you choose your sample
rate, number o
| > > Whilst sample rate is up for discussion, -
| could
| > > somebody confirm what is the quality of
| broadcast
| > > FM music is in terms of sample rate ? When
| > > recording from the radio via line-in Cool Edit
| > > shows the source as 16 bit stereo @ 32KHz.
| >
| > It is an analogue (anal
"Eric.Howgate" wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Ross Levis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 5:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 32 or 44.1kHz for 128
> kbit/sec mp3s fromsoundcard?
>
>
- Original Message -
From: Ross Levis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 5:46 AM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 32 or 44.1kHz for 128
kbit/sec mp3s fromsoundcard?
> "Eric.Howgate" wrote:
>
> > Whilst sample
| OdesÃlatel: Ross Levis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| "Eric.Howgate" wrote:
|
| > Whilst sample rate is up for discussion, - could
| > somebody confirm what is the quality of broadcast
| > FM music is in terms of sample rate ? When
| > recording from the radio via line-in Cool Edit
| > shows the sou
"Eric.Howgate" wrote:
> Whilst sample rate is up for discussion, - could
> somebody confirm what is the quality of broadcast
> FM music is in terms of sample rate ? When
> recording from the radio via line-in Cool Edit
> shows the source as 16 bit stereo @ 32KHz.
It is an analogue (analog for y
- Original Message -
From: Robert Hegemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 32 or 44.1kHz for 128
kbit/sec mp3s fromsoundcard?
Christian Schepke schrieb am Mit, 12 Jul 2000:
> Are we talking abo
Hello Naoki,
Thursday, July 13, 2000, 9:10:08 AM, you wrote:
Jaroslav>> Sure. But not only metal. All music needs bandwidtw up to 100kHz. Ears
Jaroslav>> cannot hear stable sinus frequency, but music is not sinus; music is
Jaroslav>> impulses, that have more energy at band >20kHz, and you can
Jaroslav> Sure. But not only metal. All music needs bandwidtw up to 100kHz. Ears
Jaroslav> cannot hear stable sinus frequency, but music is not sinus; music is
Jaroslav> impulses, that have more energy at band >20kHz, and you can hear it all (by
Jaroslav> not by ears and only impulses, not sinus
| > 32 kHz is more than enough for heavy-metal: all
| > heavy-metal enthousiasts have their ears destroyed
| > by concerts at +120dB, and I seriously doubt they
| > can ear frequencies >16kHz :-))
| > (keep cool, I love Metallica, I mean the old
| > Metallica, when they were playing good and stra
Christian Schepke schrieb am Mit, 12 Jul 2000:
> Are we talking about bandwidth or sampling frequencies ?
> I think meant was to lower the sampling frequency from
> 44.1 kHz (frequencies - 20 kHz) to 32 kHz (frequencies - 16 kHz).
> Imho it would make no sense to resample a CD (44.1kHz) and encode
> >
> > 32 kHz is more than enough for heavy-metal: all
> > heavy-metal enthousiasts have their ears destroyed
> > by concerts at +120dB, and I seriously doubt they
> > can ear frequencies >16kHz :-))
> > (keep cool, I love Metallica, I mean the old
> > Metallica, when they were playing good and
>
> 32 kHz is more than enough for heavy-metal: all
> heavy-metal enthousiasts have their ears destroyed
> by concerts at +120dB, and I seriously doubt they
> can ear frequencies >16kHz :-))
> (keep cool, I love Metallica, I mean the old
> Metallica, when they were playing good and strange
> mus
Shawn Riley wrote:
>
>
> I wonder if that's because it's classical or choral music you're encoding, & not
>heavy metal or techno. Your music may not be forcing the use of short blocks as often
>as some other genres.
> Can we really say whether 32 or 44.1kHz sounds best at 128kBit/sec (or l
15 matches
Mail list logo
