Re: [MP3 ENCODER] small bug in Lame VRB?

2000-07-05 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Mark Taylor wrote: MT> Borland's C++ compiler is also free, and LAME should compile MT> with a few modifications. Anyone out there who has gotten MT> this to work interested in writing README.BORLAND? I could give it a shot, but don't expect anything for at least a month.

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] small bug in Lame VRB?

2000-07-04 Thread Mark Taylor
> no, another problem. i pay money to my provider for internet service. > it was about 10$ per month and now it is about 0.90$ per hour. i think > you understand that i don't want TO PAY for my FREE compiles. now i'm > trying to find another ways to upload dayly updated cvs versions: try > thi

Re[3]: [MP3 ENCODER] small bug in Lame VRB?

2000-07-04 Thread Dmitry
Hello Roel, Tuesday, July 04, 2000, 9:40:11 PM, you wrote: RV> Sad thing Dmitry Kutsanov has no more alpha's on his page. :( RV> Traffic problems? Maybe host the download page on geocities or so. Be RV> sure to place the complete page there, and not only the binaries. RV> I've been kicked off se

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] small bug in Lame VRB?

2000-07-04 Thread Mark Taylor
> > If I found myself a copy of MSC6, is compiling the encoder a simple > matter? (like running a makefile or so?) Or are tweaks required to get > the thing running? > You can also use the free DJGPP (MSDOS version of gcc), and LAME now includes a README.DJGPP with directions including where t

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] small bug in Lame VRB?

2000-07-04 Thread Don Melton
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 07:40:11PM +0200, Roel VdB wrote: > If I found myself a copy of MSC6, is compiling the encoder a simple > matter? (like running a makefile or so?) Or are tweaks required to get > the thing running? Just unzip the tarball (such as "lame3.85beta.tar.gz"), find and open the l

Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] small bug in Lame VRB?

2000-07-04 Thread Roel VdB
Hello Robert, Tuesday, July 04, 2000, 6:18:27 PM, you wrote: >> I will fix it in a few hours, when I'm home. >> Robert RH> I checked in a first fix, more tuning may be necessary. cool. Sad thing Dmitry Kutsanov has no more alpha's on his page. :( Traffic problems? Maybe host the download page

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] small bug in Lame VRB?

2000-07-04 Thread Robert Hegemann
> > Hello, > > > > I think I might have located a bug in the 3.85 (and also 3.84, as > > mentioned before) vbr engine. > > You can notice it on this file: > > http://users.belgacom.net/gc247244/extra/teenyweenytinybug.zip > > (1.666bytes) > > > thanks and good luck ;) > > -- > > Best regards, >

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] small bug in Lame VRB?

2000-07-04 Thread Robert Hegemann
> Hello, > > I think I might have located a bug in the 3.85 (and also 3.84, as > mentioned before) vbr engine. > You can notice it on this file: > http://users.belgacom.net/gc247244/extra/teenyweenytinybug.zip > (1.666bytes) > thanks and good luck ;) > -- > Best regards, > Roel

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] small bug in Lame VRB?

2000-07-04 Thread Matthias Wächter
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Roel VdB wrote: > 2) up to 320 kbit/s for a -80->-90dB file? (this is very low volume I > assume?) I think that 320 kBit/s is chosen because if the volume of the signal is very low, the signal is amplified before encoding. But with this, the noise is amplified, too. So it loo

[MP3 ENCODER] small bug in Lame VRB?

2000-07-04 Thread Roel VdB
Hello, I think I might have located a bug in the 3.85 (and also 3.84, as mentioned before) vbr engine. You can notice it on this file: http://users.belgacom.net/gc247244/extra/teenyweenytinybug.zip (1.666bytes) info: LeftRight Peak Amplitude: -80.55 dB -90.28 dB Average RMS Po