Hi,
I am trying to stream mp3 files using RTP. At present each RTP frame has
exactly one mp3 frame (starting from synchronization word and ending at the
next sync word). This audio will have to be synchronized with video. Is
there some way of calculating the starttime and the time duration of e
On 20 Dez, Gabriel Bouvigne wrote:
> 1 step forward for Lame, but 1 step backward for freedom:
>
> http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-8225543.html?tag=hot
---snip---
The digital files are contained in a single "CDS" file format, which is
not explained. But in the license agreement for the tech
On 20 Dez, Steve Lhomme wrote:
> They don't give reasons why they use LAME. But I'm really curious to know.
> I'm not sure if it's really legal to use LAME for commercial selling of the
> encoded files (because of the patents on MP3).
More interesting:
---snip---
* INTERNATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
On 20 Dez, Stanislav O¹mera wrote:
> Gabriel Bouvigne wrote:
>
>>1 step forward for Lame, but 1 step backward for freedom:
>>
>>http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-8225543.html?tag=hot
>>http://www.musichelponline.com/legal/
>>
> It's first CD in USA with this ?(cactus data shield protection) I'
On 20 Dez, Steve Lhomme wrote:
> They don't give reasons why they use LAME. But I'm really curious to know.
Perhaps because they just provide encrypted mp3s?
> I'm not sure if it's really legal to use LAME for commercial selling of the
> encoded files (because of the patents on MP3).
They can
> They don't give reasons why they use LAME. But I'm really curious to know.
> I'm not sure if it's really legal to use LAME for commercial selling of
the
> encoded files (because of the patents on MP3).
They're probably using Lame because it's saving money compared to FhG.
For sure it's legal to
Gabriel Bouvigne wrote:
>1 step forward for Lame, but 1 step backward for freedom:
>
>http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-8225543.html?tag=hot
>http://www.musichelponline.com/legal/
>
It's first CD in USA with this ?(cactus data shield protection) I'm
wondering. Here in europe (Czech Republick)
Quoting Gabriel Bouvigne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 1 step forward for Lame, but 1 step backward for freedom:
>
> http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-8225543.html?tag=hot
> http://www.musichelponline.com/legal/
They don't give reasons why they use LAME. But I'm really curious to know.
I'm not sure
Is the cactus protection system really that effective? or are we to expect
some sort of a crack in the nearlying future?
perhaps something that would be implementable to EAC?
/Cheers: David
At 08:50 2001-12-20 Thursday +0100, you wrote:
>1 step forward for Lame, but 1 step backward for freedom:
1 step forward for Lame, but 1 step backward for freedom:
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-8225543.html?tag=hot
http://www.musichelponline.com/legal/
Gabriel Bouvigne
www.mp3-tech.org
___
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie
10 matches
Mail list logo