[mpir-devel] Re: Release candidate 2?

2009-02-04 Thread Bill Hart
Thanks. As soon as we release, it would be great if you could give it a go and we can issue a service release. Bill. 2009/2/4 : > > On Wednesday 04 February 2009 18:35:24 Bill Hart wrote: >> Hi Mariah, >> >> 2009/2/4 Mariah : >> > Bill, >> > >> > On Feb 4, 12:25 am, Bill Hart wrote: >> >> I ha

[mpir-devel] Re: Release candidate 2?

2009-02-04 Thread jason
On Wednesday 04 February 2009 18:35:24 Bill Hart wrote: > Hi Mariah, > > 2009/2/4 Mariah : > > Bill, > > > > On Feb 4, 12:25 am, Bill Hart wrote: > >> I have placed a tarball here: > >> > >> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wbhart/mpir-0.9.0.tar.gz > > > > Some quick observations - > > > > 1.

[mpir-devel] Re: Release candidate 2?

2009-02-04 Thread Bill Hart
Regarding 1, this is merely because of the way that mpir and yasm (the assembler used in mpir - which is distributed with it) are chained together on x86. The mpir make triggers the yasm configure and make. This was a hack and no one seems to know how to chain two packages together so that somethi

[mpir-devel] Re: Release candidate 2?

2009-02-04 Thread Bill Hart
Hi Mariah, 2009/2/4 Mariah : > > Bill, > > On Feb 4, 12:25 am, Bill Hart wrote: >> I have placed a tarball here: >> >> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wbhart/mpir-0.9.0.tar.gz >> > > Some quick observations - > > 1. It looks like you have to build in the source tree. Many software > packag

[mpir-devel] Release candidate 3

2009-02-04 Thread Bill Hart
I've made some changes to some documentation due to some incorrect bug addresses pointed out by Paul Zimmermann. I've also done some hacking to the autotools stuff to stop these silly errors I was getting on sage.math. The new tarball replaces the old at: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wb

[mpir-devel] Re: Release candidate 2?

2009-02-04 Thread Mariah
Bill, On Feb 4, 12:25 am, Bill Hart wrote: > I have placed a tarball here: > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wbhart/mpir-0.9.0.tar.gz > Some quick observations - 1. It looks like you have to build in the source tree. Many software packages let you have an object directory separate from