We should distribute latex with MPIR. ;-)
Bill.
2009/2/12 :
>
> On Thursday 12 February 2009 16:14:08 Bill Hart wrote:
>> It did work on my machine last night, as that is how I generated the docs.
>>
>> Did you change the makefile?
>>
>> You have to be in the doc directory when you type make pd
On Thursday 12 February 2009 16:14:08 Bill Hart wrote:
> It did work on my machine last night, as that is how I generated the docs.
>
> Did you change the makefile?
>
> You have to be in the doc directory when you type make pdf, etc.
>
> Bill.
I think tex is not installed properly on my machine
It did work on my machine last night, as that is how I generated the docs.
Did you change the makefile?
You have to be in the doc directory when you type make pdf, etc.
Bill.
2009/2/12 :
>
> On Thursday 12 February 2009 15:08:21 Bill Hart wrote:
>> There is no point changing gmp.h or gmp-impl
On Thursday 12 February 2009 15:08:21 Bill Hart wrote:
> There is no point changing gmp.h or gmp-impl.h as other programs are
> not going to compile if we do that. I see no point in changing
> gmp-mparam.h to mpir-mparam.h, though I see no problem in changing it
> if we want to.
>
> However, we sh
On Feb 12, 3:07 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> On Thursday 12 February 2009 14:48:00 Cactus wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 12, 2:30 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> > > On Thursday 12 February 2009 13:29:33 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 12 February 2009 08:54:06 ja.
There is no point changing gmp.h or gmp-impl.h as other programs are
not going to compile if we do that. I see no point in changing
gmp-mparam.h to mpir-mparam.h, though I see no problem in changing it
if we want to.
However, we should definitely change doc/gmp.tex to doc/mpir.tex and
ensure that
On Thursday 12 February 2009 14:48:00 Cactus wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2:30 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 February 2009 13:29:33 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> > > On Thursday 12 February 2009 08:54:06 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> > > > As we have our first release no
Jason,
we can also begin merging the new K8 assembly code into trunk. I'll
begin working on this in a couple of days. I need to convert it to
yasm format and sort out the calling conventions.
Bill.
2009/2/12 Cactus :
>
>
>
> On Feb 12, 2:30 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
>> On Thursday 12
On Feb 12, 2:30 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> On Thursday 12 February 2009 13:29:33 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 12 February 2009 08:54:06 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> > > As we have our first release now , I will go ahead and change the names
> > > of the li
On Thursday 12 February 2009 13:29:33 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> On Thursday 12 February 2009 08:54:06 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> > As we have our first release now , I will go ahead and change the names
> > of the library components to mpir. I will do this in trunk starting with
>
On Thursday 12 February 2009 08:54:06 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> As we have our first release now , I will go ahead and change the names of
> the library components to mpir. I will do this in trunk starting with
> r1601. It should be fairly straight forward and I imagine the testing will
>
As we have our first release now , I will go ahead and change the names of the
library components to mpir. I will do this in trunk starting with r1601. It
should be fairly straight forward and I imagine the testing will take longer
than doing it. I'll do the changes one step at a time and each
On Wednesday 11 February 2009 21:54:57 Bill Hart wrote:
> I've added systems that have at some point passed tests to the
> website:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wbhart/RoundedCorner/index.html
>
> Can people add systems here which pass the tests that aren't listed
> there, or give me a
13 matches
Mail list logo
