Re: [mpir-devel] Failed to build on mipsel

2011-02-11 Thread Jason
On Saturday 05 February 2011 16:40:20 Lifeng Sun wrote: > Hi all, > > I failed to build MPIR (r3342) on mipsel and the compiler produced the > following error, > > divexact_1.c: In function ‘__gmpn_divexact_1’: > divexact_1.c:117: error: impossible constraint in ‘asm’ > divexact_1.c:138: er

Re: [mpir-devel] Digest for mpir-devel@googlegroups.com - 4 Messages in 1 Topic

2011-02-11 Thread Bill Hart
Well, it's answered here: "If you distribute the Cygwin™ DLL, either in its original form or in a form modified by you, you must adhere to the terms of the GPL, i.e. you must provide sources for the Cygwin™ DLL" That's basically what Paul said. It doesn't make your app GPL'd though, apparently,

Re: [mpir-devel] Digest for mpir-devel@googlegroups.com - 4 Messages in 1 Topic

2011-02-11 Thread Antony Vennard
But... now correct me if I've read this wrong, but my interpretation is that if you want to distribute cygwin1.dll with your app then you must make *that* (cygwin1.dll only) available under the GPL. You can distribute whatever you write as a binary under any OSI-compatible license "as if it didn't

Re: [mpir-devel] Digest for mpir-devel@googlegroups.com - 4 Messages in 1 Topic

2011-02-11 Thread Bill Hart
Unless of course you want to distribute the cygwin1.dll with your binary, which you may well want to do. On 11 February 2011 16:10, Antony Vennard wrote: > From the cygwin website http://cygwin.com/licensing.html > > In accordance with section 10 of the GPL, Red Hat permits programs whose > sourc

Re: [mpir-devel] Digest for mpir-devel@googlegroups.com - 4 Messages in 1 Topic

2011-02-11 Thread Antony Vennard
>From the cygwin website http://cygwin.com/licensing.html In accordance with section 10 of the GPL, Red Hat permits programs whose sources are distributed under a license that complies with the Open Source Definition [See http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd/ for the precise Open Source Definition a

Re: [mpir-devel] Digest for mpir-devel@googlegroups.com - 4 Messages in 1 Topic

2011-02-11 Thread Bill Hart
I guess that is because in order to distribute a binary for Cygwin, you have to link it against the Cygwin dll and maybe even provide a Cygwin dll. That would be GPL licensed. That had not specifically occurred to me, but I guess it makes sense. Thanks for pointing it out. Bill. On 11 February 2

[mpir-devel] Re: MinGW64

2011-02-11 Thread jason
Hi , here is exactly how to do it , the installs seem consistent now , as I deleted the whole thing and reinstalled and it worked every time The 64bit mingw comes configured as a cross compiler , which as far as we are concered just means that the gcc.exe etc are renamed to x86_64- w64-mingw32-gcc

Re: [mpir-devel] Digest for mpir-devel@googlegroups.com - 4 Messages in 1 Topic

2011-02-11 Thread Paul Leyland
> -- 2 of 4 -- > From: Bill Hart > Date: Feb 10 10:07AM > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel/msg/f15fa392b04436d > > Unfortunately I don't know what is causing this. Jason Moxham did most > of the recent work on Cygwin and did lots of testing. It should be > fine. I c