ICL does handle gcc-inline assembler, f.e.
int32_t bit_scan_reverse_asm64 ( uint64_t x ) {
__asm__ __volatile ( "bsrq %0, %0" : "=r" ( x ) : "0" ( x ) );
return ( int32_t ) x;
}
compiles just fine without doing anything in particular. Fast-call ABI is
different from linux, though, so at
Done.
On 6 August 2013 13:20, Bill Hart wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> You can see who is up to what point by looking at the GitHub network
> graph, e.g. here:
>
> https://github.com/wbhart/mpir/network
>
> It shows that you and JP both have patches that I don't have at present.
>
> What matters the mo
Hi Brian,
You can see who is up to what point by looking at the GitHub network graph,
e.g. here:
https://github.com/wbhart/mpir/network
It shows that you and JP both have patches that I don't have at present.
What matters the most is that *your* git has all the patches that you want.
To do this
On Tuesday, August 6, 2013 1:51:18 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 6, 2013 1:37:40 PM UTC+2, Cactus wrote:
>>
>> On 06/08/2013 10:07, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>> >
>> [snip helpful detail]
>>
>> Thanks JP, I will study how you work in the hope that I might get to
On Tuesday, August 6, 2013 1:37:40 PM UTC+2, Cactus wrote:
>
> On 06/08/2013 10:07, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> >
> [snip helpful detail]
>
> Thanks JP, I will study how you work in the hope that I might get to
> love GIT!
>
> However, with SVN it is much easier to manage the definitive MPIR
On 06/08/2013 10:07, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
[snip helpful detail]
Thanks JP, I will study how you work in the hope that I might get to
love GIT!
However, with SVN it is much easier to manage the definitive MPIR than
it appears to be with GIT.
For example, I am the primary manager of the stu
On Tuesday, August 6, 2013 10:18:05 AM UTC+2, Cactus wrote:
>
> On 06/08/2013 08:47, Cactus wrote:
> > This is a comment on the item:
> >
> > use __INTEL_COMPILER instead of INTEL_COMPILER in longlong.inc files
> >
> > on Bill's list of MPIR ToDo items.
> >
> > On Linux I believe that the
On 06/08/2013 08:47, Cactus wrote:
> This is a comment on the item:
>
> use __INTEL_COMPILER instead of INTEL_COMPILER in longlong.inc files
>
> on Bill's list of MPIR ToDo items.
>
> On Linux I believe that the defines for the "Intel compiler version" are
> __ICC
> and __INTEL_COMPILER. On W
This is a comment on the item:
use __INTEL_COMPILER instead of INTEL_COMPILER in longlong.inc files
on Bill's list of MPIR ToDo items.
On Linux I believe that the defines for the "Intel compiler version" are __ICC
and __INTEL_COMPILER. On WIndows the define for the "Intel compiler
version" is
