Yes, nails can be useful for testing. But for now I've disabled it at
the configure level. Only --enable-nails=0 and --enable-nails=no (or
no nails option at all) are now valid.
Bill.
2009/1/10 :
>
> On Saturday 10 January 2009 02:13:31 Bill Hart wrote:
>> Actually NAILS=1 isn't so hot either.
On Saturday 10 January 2009 02:13:31 Bill Hart wrote:
> Actually NAILS=1 isn't so hot either. :-)
I read somewhere , on gmp list i think, that gmp never supported odd nails ,
but TG never got around to disable the configure for it.
I remember this from when nails first came out .
define nails s
Actually NAILS=1 isn't so hot either. :-)
2009/1/10 mabshoff :
>
>
> On Jan 9, 5:39 pm, "Jason Martin"
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I'd like to get rid of NAILS support. It adds a huge amount of
>> complication, and I haven't seen it actually pan out for any modern
>> processor.
>>
>> I vote for leavi
On Jan 9, 5:39 pm, "Jason Martin"
wrote:
Hi,
> I'd like to get rid of NAILS support. It adds a huge amount of
> complication, and I haven't seen it actually pan out for any modern
> processor.
>
> I vote for leaving the existing NAILS code alone, but explicitly
> stating that NAILS is not sup
I'd like to get rid of NAILS support. It adds a huge amount of
complication, and I haven't seen it actually pan out for any modern
processor.
I vote for leaving the existing NAILS code alone, but explicitly
stating that NAILS is not supported. Perhaps, if we do discover some
use for it, it migh
