Re: [mpir-devel] Re: Question on mpz_probab_prime_p

2010-03-18 Thread Jason Moxham
March 18, 2010 8:00 AM > To: "mpir-devel" > Subject: [mpir-devel] Re: Question on mpz_probab_prime_p > > > On Mar 18, 11:21 am, "Chris Saunders" wrote: > >> I was reading the documentation on mpz_probab_prime_p. At the bottom of > >> the >

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: Question on mpz_probab_prime_p

2010-03-18 Thread Chris Saunders
gmp_randstate_t argument. Could I ask what the purpose of this argument is? Regards Chris Saunders -- From: "Cactus" Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:00 AM To: "mpir-devel" Subject: [mpir-devel] Re: Question on mpz_probab_prime_p

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: Question on mpz_probab_prime_p

2010-03-18 Thread Bill Hart
Just to add to what Brian says. We certainly recognise that the community values full GMP compatibility more than some other aspects of the MPIR design criteria, and we have definitely been giving it more full attention than we used to. Even so, there are some instances where compatibility will be

[mpir-devel] Re: Question on mpz_probab_prime_p

2010-03-18 Thread Cactus
On Mar 18, 11:21 am, "Chris Saunders" wrote: > I was reading the documentation on mpz_probab_prime_p.  At the bottom of the > documentation of this function it says "This function is obsolete.  It will > disappear from future MPIR releases."  I have not seen the same in the GMP > documentation f