March 18, 2010 8:00 AM
> To: "mpir-devel"
> Subject: [mpir-devel] Re: Question on mpz_probab_prime_p
>
> > On Mar 18, 11:21 am, "Chris Saunders" wrote:
> >> I was reading the documentation on mpz_probab_prime_p. At the bottom of
> >> the
>
gmp_randstate_t argument. Could I ask what the purpose of this argument is?
Regards
Chris Saunders
--
From: "Cactus"
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:00 AM
To: "mpir-devel"
Subject: [mpir-devel] Re: Question on mpz_probab_prime_p
Just to add to what Brian says. We certainly recognise that the
community values full GMP compatibility more than some other aspects
of the MPIR design criteria, and we have definitely been giving it
more full attention than we used to.
Even so, there are some instances where compatibility will be
On Mar 18, 11:21 am, "Chris Saunders" wrote:
> I was reading the documentation on mpz_probab_prime_p. At the bottom of the
> documentation of this function it says "This function is obsolete. It will
> disappear from future MPIR releases." I have not seen the same in the GMP
> documentation f