[mpir-devel] Re: eMPIRe-svn1523 vs. Sage 3.2.3

2009-01-05 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:54 AM, mabshoff wrote: > > > > On Jan 3, 5:58 pm, "Jason Martin" > wrote: >> Excellent!! Thanks for the error checking Michael!! >> >> Jason Worth Martin >> Asst. Professor of Mathematicshttp://www.math.jmu.edu/~martin > > Ok, I have now verified that for all a up to 1

[mpir-devel] Re: eMPIRe-svn1523 vs. Sage 3.2.3

2009-01-05 Thread mabshoff
On Jan 3, 5:58 pm, "Jason Martin" wrote: > Excellent!!  Thanks for the error checking Michael!! > > Jason Worth Martin > Asst. Professor of Mathematicshttp://www.math.jmu.edu/~martin Ok, I have now verified that for all a up to 10**10 "(- a^3).is_perfect_power()" returns true. Now obviously I

[mpir-devel] Re: eMPIRe-svn1523 vs. Sage 3.2.3

2009-01-03 Thread mabshoff
Ok, I did valgrind all the tests and aside from one tiny issue t- locale I found no problems in all 109 or so tests I found. Time to catch some sleep :) Cheers, Michael t-locale is a C++ issue, but I haven't looked at the sources yet or even build with debug info so I could start poking around

[mpir-devel] Re: eMPIRe-svn1523 vs. Sage 3.2.3

2009-01-03 Thread mabshoff
On Jan 3, 7:00 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote: > On Sunday 04 January 2009 02:52:55 mabshoff wrote: Hi Jason, > > Can you write a test and check it in? I am not sure if anyone added > > one yet. > > the above from current svn of mpir trunk at tests/mpz/t-perfpow.c Ok, please excuse my du

[mpir-devel] Re: eMPIRe-svn1523 vs. Sage 3.2.3

2009-01-03 Thread jason
On Sunday 04 January 2009 02:52:55 mabshoff wrote: > On Jan 3, 6:48 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote: > > On Sunday 04 January 2009 01:56:15 mabshoff wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > > > So while the results are correct we either have an unfixed memory leak > > > either in Sage and/or eMPIRe. I have pl

[mpir-devel] Re: eMPIRe-svn1523 vs. Sage 3.2.3

2009-01-03 Thread mabshoff
On Jan 3, 6:48 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote: > On Sunday 04 January 2009 01:56:15 mabshoff wrote: Hi Jason, > > So while the results are correct we either have an unfixed memory leak > > either in Sage and/or eMPIRe. I have planned to do some valgrinding on > > eMPIRe as well as Sage+eM

[mpir-devel] Re: eMPIRe-svn1523 vs. Sage 3.2.3

2009-01-03 Thread jason
On Sunday 04 January 2009 01:56:15 mabshoff wrote: > On Jan 3, 5:20 pm, mabshoff > dortmund.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > I am now running some larger examples to see if anything pops up. > > Oops, I nearly too sage.math down with a 189GB job (not a typo) when > running this: > >time len([a f

[mpir-devel] Re: eMPIRe-svn1523 vs. Sage 3.2.3

2009-01-03 Thread Jason Martin
Excellent!! Thanks for the error checking Michael!! Jason Worth Martin Asst. Professor of Mathematics http://www.math.jmu.edu/~martin On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 8:56 PM, mabshoff wrote: > > > > On Jan 3, 5:20 pm, mabshoff dortmund.de> wrote: >> Hi, > > > >> I am now running some larger example

[mpir-devel] Re: eMPIRe-svn1523 vs. Sage 3.2.3

2009-01-03 Thread mabshoff
On Jan 3, 5:20 pm, mabshoff wrote: > Hi, > I am now running some larger examples to see if anything pops up. Oops, I nearly too sage.math down with a 189GB job (not a typo) when running this: time len([a for a in srange(10*10) if not (-a^3).is_perfect_power ()]) This might have been a