Re: Problem with Windows XP

2003-07-11 Thread Paul Clarke
I am trying to create a pair of channels between a Win 2k machine and a Win XP machine. On the Win XP machine I can do a ping channel to the Win2k machine. When I try the same thing on the Win 2k machine I get an error and in the general error log on the Win XP machine I get: AMQ9213: A

IBM MQSeries and SonicMQ

2003-07-11 Thread Sony Varghese
RE: MQCONN FAILEDHi, Does any one know if MQSeries to SonicMQ Intercommunication is possible? Can a MQSeries Queue Manager talk to a SonicMQ Queue Manager (not sure if this is the term used in SonicMQ) ? Do reply.. Thanks, Sony Varghese Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription

Re: IBM MQSeries and SonicMQ

2003-07-11 Thread Scott Gray
http://www.sonicsoftware.com/products/enterprise_messaging/sonicmq_bridges/i ndex.ssp -Original Message- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sony Varghese Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IBM MQSeries and SonicMQ RE: MQCONN

Re: Remote management of MQ on OS/390?

2003-07-11 Thread Bill Wilson
Wow, works great thanks -Original Message- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nick Dilauro Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Remote management of MQ on OS/390? Bill, Assuming you already have a connection to the intermediate

In MO71, how do I...

2003-07-11 Thread Potkay, Peter M (PLC, IT)
Display all channels for a QM except for the channels beginning with SYSTEM*? channel ==SYS* Gives me channels only beginning with SYS. What filter command will exclude channels beginning with SYS? Peter Potkay MQSeries Specialist The Hartford Financial Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] x77906 IBM

Windows/2000 and SP4 NOT SP3

2003-07-11 Thread Rick Tsujimoto
In my original posting I meant to say SP4, not SP3. Fat-finger error. It looks like SP4 is now available and would like to know if anyone knows if there's any problems using it with WMQ. Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide

Re: Windows/2000 and SP4 NOT SP3

2003-07-11 Thread Rexford Ballard
There are numerous reports of various issues with SP4, especially problems with 3rd party software. Test this very carefully before deploying to production. Rick Tsujimoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]@AKH-WIEN.AC.AT on 07/11/2003 09:49:22 AM Please respond to MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:

Re: Windows/2000 and SP4 NOT SP3

2003-07-11 Thread KANE, TOM M (SBCSI)
Do you mean specifically for Windows/2000 or with SP4 across Unix as well? TIA Tom -Original Message- From: Rexford Ballard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Windows/2000 and SP4 NOT SP3 There are numerous reports of

Trigger question

2003-07-11 Thread Williams, Dave (Systems Management)
We're experiencing an issue where we have 2 new queues (on an NT QMGR, V5.2) defined as triggered, but it's not triggering - * There ARE queues on this box that ARE triggering. * The path and executable are correct - we can manually drive this and the process works. * These are new, but I think

Supported Versions

2003-07-11 Thread Terry Fors
Is anyone using the following environment on AIX 5.2, or know if it is supported? WebSphere MQ V5.3 WebSphere Business Integration Broker V5.0 WebSphere Business Interchange Server V4.2 (Crossworlds) Thanks Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv

Re: Windows/2000 and SP4 NOT SP3

2003-07-11 Thread Rick Tsujimoto
Windows/2000 KANE, TOM M (SBCSI) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: Windows/2000 and SP4 NOT SP3 MQSeries

Re: Trigger question

2003-07-11 Thread Miller, Dennis
How do you know it's not triggering? -Original Message- From: Williams, Dave (Systems Management) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Trigger question We're experiencing an issue where we have 2 new queues (on an

Re: OpenCursosrLimit

2003-07-11 Thread Yonny Serrano
Problem solved, we are using passthru instead of eval. Yonny. Yonny Serrano/GBM 24/06/2003 12:41 To p.m. MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Simple flow exception

2003-07-11 Thread Yonny Serrano
Hello, I seem to have a problem with one of my flows, it's processing all the Compute Nodes and everything else just fine, but it's failing when it's outputting the message to it's OutputNode. The flow has one MQInput node going into a trycatch node which has 2 compute nodes that in turn go

Re: Trigger question

2003-07-11 Thread Williams, Dave (Systems Management)
I'm less familiar w/NT side, but we see 1) Triggering is on 2) Curr depth gores from 0 to 1 - nothing happens. 3) the .exe specified in the process def path (correct, by the way) when executed empties the queue. Dave W. -Original Message- From: Miller, Dennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Trigger question

2003-07-11 Thread Thomas, Don
I would guess it is an authority issue. When the program is triggered by MQ it runs under MQ privileges. When run manually it runs under the authority of the user who submitted it. I'd run the trigger monitor in an open DOS window and watch what happens when the trigger event occurs. Does the

Re: Trigger question

2003-07-11 Thread Luc-Michel Demey
and what about the trigger monitor ? started ? HTH, Luc-Michel. Date sent: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 12:34:17 -0400 Send reply to: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Williams, Dave (Systems Management) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Trigger

Re: Simple flow exception

2003-07-11 Thread Christopher Frank
Yonnie, A 6062 error indicates that one or more message headers follow the message body, rather than preceeding it. In your case you have an RFH2 after the message body, rather than before it. You need to construct your output message tree such that the message body follows rather than preceeds

(Fwd) RE: Re: Trigger question

2003-07-11 Thread Luc-Michel Demey
ok try to start the trigger in a dos window, so you will be able to see trigger messages and erros if any. HTH, Luc-Michel. --- Forwarded message follows --- Subject:RE: Re: Trigger question Date sent: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 12:53:38 -0400 From:

Re: Trigger question

2003-07-11 Thread Heggie, Peter
This is one of the best ways to debug a trigger problem. Instead of starting the trigger monitor using the GUI, or as a background process, start it in a new DOS window by entering runmqtrm -m qmgrname -q initqueuename. All the output from the monitor will be displayed in the DOS window. Test your

MQMDE - question

2003-07-11 Thread Fryett.Chris
I have added a MQMDE header to my data package in order to support the MQMD Extensions. Does the QMGR suppose to remove it at the time an application does a MQGET()? Chris * The information transmitted is

Re: Trigger question

2003-07-11 Thread GIES, STEVE
Dave - We have found that the NT Client trigger monitor does not properly handle path definitions that contain spaces (i.e. C:\Program Files\My Program Dir\My Program.exe). This has to be specified using the DOS path (i.e. C:\PROGRA~1\MYPROG~1\MYPROG~1.EXE). I'm not sure if the server version

Re: Trigger question

2003-07-11 Thread Miller, Dennis
Have you specified an initq on the triggered queue definition and do you have a trigger monitor running against it? Does a trigger message show up in the DLQ? -Original Message- From: Williams, Dave (Systems Management) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:34 AM To:

MQ and XA commit coordination

2003-07-11 Thread Stefan Sievert
Hi folks, I am trying to put together a matrix of supported XA resource coordination scenarios. My potential in-scope candidates are: Resource Managers (XA participants) - MQ V5.2 and 5.3 - Oracle DB - IBM UDB Resource coordinators - MQ V5.2 and 5.3 - BEA WebLogic - IBM WebSphere AS Platforms: -

Re: Trigger question

2003-07-11 Thread McCarty, Brian
The long windows path's definitely don't work. Do what Steve suggested below with short file names...or alternatively put your execution in a batch file and put it in a short path like C:\Batch\prog.bat. I find that putting to long of string on the process definition makes it harder to

Re: Questionable MQ infrastructure design

2003-07-11 Thread Vitaliy Ilyin
I've seen a lot of responses to thisone which is actually very ineresting discusion topic. Most of responses concentrate on 1) resource usage on the server running multiple QMgrs 2) 20char limit to the channel names 3) It desn't have any sense to run multiple QMgrs on the same server because