I will be out of the office starting 09/22/2003 and will not return until
09/30/2003.
I will be out of the office beginning Monday, 22 September through Monday,
29 September.
Calls on problems involving MQSeries or MQSI should be directed to the ING
Solutions Center at 800.790.2978. All other
Hi Lynn,
>>>However, if I change the queue definition to DEFBIND(OPEN),
>>>doesn't that mean that nothing will get clustered for that
>>>queue? The particular message flow in question processes
>>>many different interfaces, some containing groups and some
>>>containing individual messages. They
I'm not sure that I ever saw any kind of answer on
thisI thought that I read somewhere something
about a problem related to messages that were greater
than 32K. I know that your message was around 8K.
However, I'd make sure that you have the latest CSD
applied and see if that solves the proble
I found your APAR which has it fixed in MQ5.2.
However, buried in chapter 10 page 116 of the System Admin manual for 5.3 I
find the following statement:
"On UNIX systems, the authorization routines check the real (logged-in) user
ID."
This is new to MQ 5.3 on Unix (it's marked as new in the manu
Thanks Peter!
That certainly helps.
- Usha
At 08:26 AM 9/22/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Decent
memory would be about 1 to 2 gig, but its all relative. If you have 2 gig
of mem, and you are using all of it, I would not consider that decent. On
the flip side, if you have only 1 gig, and you are onl
Hi Christopher,
Thanks for the info. I had been wondering whether or not WMQI
usedMQOO_BIND_AS_Q_DEF when it
opens a queue for output. Thanks for confirming that.
However, if I change the queue definition to DEFBIND(OPEN), doesn't that
mean that nothing will get clustered for that queue? The p
1) disable and enable the gets on the initiation queue.
GET(DISABLED)GET(ENABLED)
If i use this method where do the messages accumulate? on the local or
initq?
On the local queue.
When the gets are enabled will the trigger montior start to submit the batch
jobs again?
>>> Depends on what happe
Without doing anythingAfter the task ends or on the first SYNCPOINT.
You can specify NO_SYNCPOINT in your PMO & GMO options to remove and make
messges available immed.
You can also insert CICS SYNCPOINTS at the end of your LUW's to tighten
message processing.
Depends on your syncpoint option.
"Larry Murray"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "MQSeries List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/22/2003 09:50 AM
Please respond to "MQSeries
List"
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:
A question of "when"
If a si
Hi
Juni,
No, the CCSID is set for 37, not 937. Our AS/400s are on
MQ 5.2 with CSD07, but we have been using this workaround since at
least CSD05 or maybe earlier.
This
workaround solution resolved our problem with negative extended decimal
elements. I didn't know if it would resolve y
Be warned, on 390, the MQCD version may be incorrectly set
> in a clustered environment (too high a level) and so an 0C4
> may not be far away if you totally trust it. There was an
> PAR raised for this in MQ 2.1 (can't remember if it was PQ39541,
> or PQ41371), and it may have also applied to 5.
If a single active CICS task gets and put1's several messages, is a message
made available
to the MQ client immediately after the MQPut1? or are the messages made
available after the task ends?
Thank you...
Larry
Larry Murray
Putnam Investments
Tech Services
1-617-760-3270
Instructions for man
Hello all,
I would like to be able to stop the arrival of a message on a queue from
triggering a batch jcl to be submitted.
i have set up a local queue with the following trigger definition:
Trigger Definition
Trigger type . . . . . . . : F F=First,E=Every,D=Depth,N=None
Trigger set
Hello John,
Aha! I thought someone must be bitten by that problem sooner or later. I found it on
Solaris, starting with MQ 5.2 CSD03. It looks like MQSeries ignores effective user and
group ids, at least for some questions. The interesting thing is that there was an
issue known and accepted by
Grrr...bloody Microsoft Windows calculator...
Ok, so it was my goof but I figure if anything Microsoft was in the mix I
have plausible deniability!
-- T.Rob
-Original Message-
From: Jim Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 5:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Usha,
Turn
the trace off with:
endmqtrc -m -a
See http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/html/amqzag04/amqzag044k.htm#HDRENDMQT for
details.
--
T.Rob
-Original Message-From: Usha Suryadevara
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 2:38
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Decent
memory would be about 1 to 2 gig, but its all relative. If you have 2 gig of
mem, and you are using all of it, I would not consider that decent. On the flip
side, if you have only 1 gig, and you are only using 256meg, you are very
decent. I guess a better way to say it would be if you hav
Title: Message
I am trying to write
an application to query the status of a cluster for non-mqm
users
I have written a C++
application which uses the MQAI to issue the commands to the server. I can get
this to work fine when run under my user ID (which is a member of
mqm).
What I want to be
Hi,
I would like to know how the msgId and correlId is generated in the MQOutput
node. I found these values are accesible in LocalEnvironment, but how are
they genrated?
TIA,
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at ht
Sony,
To unsubscribe, send a message with
UNSUBSCRIBE MQSERIES
in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note the address is "LISTSERV@",
not "MQSERIES@". You have to send commands to the list server, not the list
itself!
-- T.Rob
-Original Message-
From: Sony Varghese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
MessageUNSUBSCRIBE
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Title: Re : Non-Unique Message Ids
Hi all
I have a question for the OS390 guys with regards to the DPL Bridge.
We have an application sending request messages that have a message id that is non-unique so that we can aggregate/relate all the replies. The DPL Bridge requires that the Correl
Risks of implementing Single Write Integrity
Solaris 5.8
MQ 5.2 CSD7
We are having some performance issues on our Queue managers lately and I was
considering moving from Triple to Single Write Integrity. All disks are on an
EMC SAN so I assume this is exactly the sort of situation that the Sing
Hi
Jeff
Thanks
for your recommendation. There is a wizard in DB2 that can help optimise
performance (Configure Performance Wizard).
I am
looking for things that can be done within WMQI.
Hi Nelson
Did you mean
SET OutputRoot.MQMD.CodedCharSetId = 937;
SET OutputRoot.MQMD.Encoding = 273;
Your mail below mentions 37 instead of 937.
Packed signed still dont seem to work , is there are specific CSD for MQ on AS/400 or WMQI required for this?
-Original Message-
From: Lynn Ne
Thanks Peter (Sorry for the late reply, was out of town).
I am sure i understood what you meant here, but what according to you is
a "decent memory" ?
Also would you happen to know if there is a way MQ logging/tracing can be
either turned off or minimized ? It seems like every 2 weeks the Error
Yes, the stored procedure sends back a return code and message associated
with a return code. The standard SQLCODE and SQLSTATE are not being passed
back though, so I lose out on retrieving the actual error. Due to this
reason we have designed it in a way that if an error occurs within the
stored
27 matches
Mail list logo
