Francois,
I can offer a couple of examples.
On an R56, in 42 hrs elapsed time, the MSTR used 143 seconds of CPU, and
the CHIN used 38 secs.
The CHIN probably didn't do anything, but the Command Server would have
been active in the MSTR. OK, so it's not strictly idle.
On a Y56, again in 42 hrs ela
Ian,
Yes, we ran MQ 2.1 successfully with CICS TS2.2.
But have a look at APAR PQ35501 (PTF UQ41060) which says:
PROBLEM SUMMARY:
* USERS AFFECTED: All Users of MQSeries V2.1 for OS/390*
***
Larry,
There doesn't seem to be anything useful in the Queue stats.
But there is Last-msg date and Last-msg time fields in Display
Channelstatus. For a Receiver channel, this is the date/time the last msg
was put to its target queue.
You might have to monitor several channels, instead of just one
Bill,
If the Receiver channel doesn't see the error for some reason, then it can
be left in a RUNNING state.
And in that case, you'll have problems re-connecting.
I can't answer the question of why the connection is dropping, and why the
RCVR doesn't see it.
But can you set the ADOPTMCA parms in t
Thank you to all who replied. Exactly the sort of info I was looking for.
Thanks,
Richard.
Glen Shubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@AKH-Wien.AC.AT> on 16/09/2003 02:08:26
Please respond to MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
OK Listers, an easy question to start the week.
This is on OS/390, although I don't think that matters.
When I define a local queue, I can define the BOQNAME (Backout requeue
name) and BOTHRESH (Backout Threshold). The FM says that the Qmgr maintains
these values, but takes no action based on the
Ernest,
2058 is a Q_MGR_NAME_ERROR. Is your IDMS connection using the defaults
module CQSBDEFV to get the Qmgr name? If so, did you update this with the
5.3 install?
Just a thought.
Richard.
earMERC Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@AKH-Wien.AC.AT> on 12/09/2003
08:21:27
Please respond to MQSerie
Riyaz,
I wrote a command processor similar to yours and tried this.
There's nothing wrong with the syntax of your command - when I ran it, it
gave me each queue with the attributes requested.
As you noted, the response for each queue comes back in a seperate message,
so your message length should
Sid,
Message Descriptor Extension:
** FUNCTION: This file declares the structure MQMDE, which
** is used by the main MQI.
**
How were these messages put on the queue?
Richard.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@AKH-WIEN.AC.AT> on 03/09/2003 15:34:30
Please respond to MQSeries List <
Dax,
I presume that TEST.EXIT.QUEUE is a local queue in both of the Qmgrs.
OK, if you send 1000 msgs in each direction, then the exit will be invoked
2000 times at each end. If I've added it up correctly, each msg that you
put to the queue is 1.5K plus header.
So 1.8K * 2000 is 3.6Mb - which is
Edward,
This shouldn't be a problem. Our system is defined like this, and we use it
to move the Qmgr round MVS images as we IPL the various systems.
The only other thing we do is to move the VTAM ACB (because we use APPC for
some of the channels), but that shouldn't prevent the Qmgr from starting.
Javier,
2059 is QMGR_NOT_AVAILABLE. Are you getting this on the client end?
I presume that you have the client attach feature on the Z/OS version of
MQ? On Z/OS, client attach is a seperate, chargable feature. I believe that
it's included as part of the Qmgr on all the other platforms.
Richard.
Erik,
Why do you ask?
CSQUZAP seems to be a utility for working with offline logs. It appears to
be deliberately un-documented, and only to be used at the direction of IBM
support.
Richard.
"Dijkerman, E (Erik)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@AKH-WIEN.AC.AT> on
31/01/2003 03:27:29
Please respond to MQ
It doesn't happen on my OS/390 system :-o
Richard.
Pavel Tolkachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@AKH-WIEN.AC.AT> on 29/01/2003
13:30:44
Please respond to MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: File System Operati
Was that a typo for the APPLICID ?
Ours have: Application ID : CSQX START. The command Ref manulal says
that's what it should be for distributed queueing without CICS.
Richard.
Mark Steely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@AKH-WIEN.AC.AT> on 26/11/2002 09:25:39
Please respond to MQSeries List <[EMAIL P
Thanks to all who responded to me on this. I have read all the replies,
although I haven't had a chance to do anything about it yet, because an
unrelated area has turned to custard and consumed all my time.
For those of you who are familiar with it, the "long running task" that I
originally refere
I have a long running task that I want to be able to query MQ resources.
This task will call my program and provide:
- a function code: Initialise, closedown, or normal call
- a correlator that I can use to anchor storage across calls
- any other parameters I need to pass.
What I planned to do was
Pablo,
Yes, this is normal behaviour. The manual (can't remember which one at the
moment) says that expired messages count towards the queue depth, even
though you can't read them any more.
Queue depth will go to 0 then the messages are deleted from the queue -
this happens when the first non-brow
18 matches
Mail list logo