Re: [Mscore-developer] Preparing MuseScore 2.0.2

2015-05-20 Thread ABL
@lasconic: Is there a plan of the features planned to be included / developed for MuseScore 2.1? Another question: if we keep two branches next release and stable release, which will be the target of the PR? If we take the Qt model as an example: they have a tree of branches and they suggest to

Re: [Mscore-developer] Preparing MuseScore 2.0.2

2015-05-20 Thread Lasconic
A plan for 2.1. Yes, sort of. More a plan for the next two or three major releases. I still need to publish it on musescore.org. Also, the plan is to adapt if someone is motivated enough to work on something that we didn't think about. I like to refer to the Qt project but I also understand we

Re: [Mscore-developer] Preparing MuseScore 2.0.2

2015-05-20 Thread Maurizio M. Gavioli
First of all, I have no suggestions on the maintenance points. About the main topic, FWIW I also believe that bug fixes are always welcome! With a few notices: 1) Users do not always care (or even know) about product versions (many do not even care about which OS they use...). I assume that

Re: [Mscore-developer] programmatic access of figured bass

2015-05-20 Thread Jim Newton
Hi Marc, yes you are right. I'm in the very early stages of my development. But I believe the approach i'm taking will lend itself very easily to chord realization as well. I'll make a special point to talk to the student about this and coordinate efforts. -- View this message in

Re: [Mscore-developer] programmatic access of figured bass

2015-05-20 Thread Maurizio M. Gavioli
Jim Newton wrote So I experimented with playback and it indeed sounds horrible. What I want to do now, is something like the Explode command. This I'll have musescore translate the encoded Figured Bass into notes on a staff which the user can then manipulate manually. Does not sound simple...

Re: [Mscore-developer] programmatic access of figured bass

2015-05-20 Thread Jim Newton
BTW does the Figured Bass notation in musescore support the tasto solo keyword? -- View this message in context: http://dev-list.musescore.org/programmatic-access-of-figured-bass-tp7579343p7579381.html Sent from the MuseScore Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Mscore-developer] Preparing MuseScore 2.0.2

2015-05-20 Thread Lasconic
@Jojo 1- Because branch are cheap and it feels right to have a branch per release. It's the same model Qt has for example. 4- We could try to remove no-obsolete. However, MuseScore 2.0 and MuseScore 2.0.1 are currently downloading translation files from different directories. My plan was to

Re: [Mscore-developer] Preparing MuseScore 2.0.2

2015-05-20 Thread Maurizio M. Gavioli
lasconic wrote 1- I agree that too short delays have consequences. However MuseScore has an update checker and it will nag users every week or so to upgrade to a more recent version. Also, I prefer having more user support to do with a simple answer (Please upgrade) than not having a good

Re: [Mscore-developer] programmatic access of figured bass

2015-05-20 Thread Maurizio M. Gavioli
Jim Newton wrote BTW does the Figured Bass notation in musescore support the tasto solo keyword? In which sense? By definition tasto solo passages have no figures, so there would be nothing to store the flag into. -- View this message in context: