Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSElang, should it use Algol 68 syntax?

2013-11-12 Thread Michael Schnell
On 11/11/2013 11:03 PM, Sieghard wrote: t _even_ C has block delimiters ({ and }), because they're _needed_ by any notation that does _not_ restrict formatting the code. In fact I _always_ use begin ... end ( or in C } ... { ) with if and loop instructions (as I do not like the ambiguity

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSElang, should it use Algol 68 syntax?

2013-11-12 Thread Martin Schreiber
On Tuesday 12 November 2013 09:19:37 Michael Schnell wrote: I suppose here the new compiler would accept just else begin. Does not look bad, but not a real improvement, IMHO. I do more like to make the end's mandatory. Like 'if' BOOLEANEXPRESSION 'then' [STATEMENT {';' STATEMENT}] ['else'

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSElang, should it use Algol 68 syntax?

2013-11-12 Thread Martin Schreiber
On Tuesday 12 November 2013 09:54:11 Michael Schnell wrote: With my background of C fro me the ; is necessary to close a statement. This I never do a line that does not end with either of ; or begin In Pascal (and in MSElang) ';' does not terminate but separate a statement. Empty statements

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSElang, should it use Algol 68 syntax?

2013-11-12 Thread Michael Schnell
On 11/12/2013 10:13 AM, Martin Schreiber wrote: In Pascal (and in MSElang) ';' does not terminate but separate a statement. Exactly. (Different from C.) Empty statements are possible - OK. Thus my (c-influenced) style is acceptable. -Michael

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSElang, should it use Algol 68 syntax?

2013-11-11 Thread Michael Schnell
On 11/10/2013 02:33 PM, Sieghard wrote: Don't try. There was _never_ a complete implementation of this language around for all the time being, although the foremost computer scientists of the time worked on these compilers (way back) then. Martin does like a decent challenge :-) :-) .

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSElang, should it use Algol 68 syntax?

2013-11-11 Thread Sieghard
Hallo Ivanko, Du schriebst am Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:41:58 +0500: The ALGOL syntax looks as a complication seems to offer no benefits :) The Algol syntax was the base for Pascal. It is very similar, although Pascal left out many constructs possible even in the simpler Algol 60 dialect, like

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSElang, should it use Algol 68 syntax?

2013-11-10 Thread Sieghard
Hallo Martin, Du schriebst am Sun, 10 Nov 2013 07:47:44 +0100: Sieghard suggests to use Algol 68 syntax instead to try to make the best of 30 years of programming experience. Opinions? Don't try. There was _never_ a complete implementation of this language around for all the time being,

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSElang, should it use Algol 68 syntax?

2013-11-10 Thread Ivanko B
The ALGOL syntax looks as a complication seems to offer no benefits :) For advanced syntax it worhs to look at Python (no begin end source text garbage etc). -- November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate