[Multisync-users] irmc with a Sony Ericsson Z1010

2004-11-30 Thread Rob Davis
Has anyone managed this? It keeps telling me that I don't have permission? (am trying over bluetooth with a cvs version about 3 weeks old.) To be exact: Failed to get second plugin changes: Not authorized.. I paired the two together when selecting the mac address and testing the connection. Oh

Re: [Multisync-users] Evolution Contacts

2004-01-13 Thread Rob Davis
Bo Lincoln wrote: Hmmm, I may have solved the problem... You know those little files in ~/evolution/local called local?.db ? They should be deleted if you reconfigure multisync.. Right, they may cause problems... Thanks for the report, I'll make sure the Evo plugin deletes these when a new s

Re: [Multisync-users] Evolution Contacts

2003-12-11 Thread Rob Davis
Bo Lincoln wrote: This seems just like it should be. You need a separate server for each client (so far), i.e. just like with remote_sync. /Bo Hmmm, I may have solved the problem... You know those little files in ~/evolution/local called local?.db ? They should be deleted if you reconfigu

Re: [Multisync-users] Evolution Contacts

2003-12-11 Thread Rob Davis
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 12:06, Rob Davis wrote: > On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 11:22, Bo Lincoln wrote: > > > All I want is for it to work like it did in 0.70.. :-( I don't want syncml > > > > I'll do my best to make it work better :) After implementing SyncML, I'

Re: [Multisync-users] Evolution Contacts

2003-12-11 Thread Rob Davis
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 11:22, Bo Lincoln wrote: > > All I want is for it to work like it did in 0.70.. :-( I don't want syncml > > I'll do my best to make it work better :) After implementing SyncML, I'm > not a fan o that standard either, but it's better to follow a standard > than to create own

Re: [Multisync-users] Evolution Contacts

2003-12-11 Thread Rob Davis
Bo Lincoln wrote: I think the biggest issue for me seems to be that deleted contacts don't seem to be applied when the instances of multisync are synced across machines. So, if mistakes are made, I then need to delete all instances (about 96) on each machine, which is very time consuming. You

Re: [Multisync-users] Evolution Contacts

2003-12-11 Thread Rob Davis
Rob Davis wrote: Bo Lincoln wrote: I think the biggest issue for me seems to be that deleted contacts don't seem to be applied when the instances of multisync are synced across machines. So, if mistakes are made, I then need to delete all instances (about 96) on each machine, which is

Re: [Multisync-users] Evolution Contacts

2003-12-10 Thread Rob Davis
Bo Lincoln wrote: > Thank you for your report! Your setup seems fine, and MultiSync should > not create duplicates. I would guess there is some bug in the SyncML > plugin so that IDs of the entires are lost. > What is your setting for handling of duplicates? Do you ever see the > interactive windo

[Multisync-users] Evolution Contacts

2003-12-10 Thread Rob Davis
I'm having trouble getting the latest (cvs and .81) versions of multisync working. I have evolution running on four machines which I'm trying to sync together using sync_ml, on my laptop I have also added irmc (or whatever it was called) to sync with my T68i via bluetooth. They're all connect