Morgan wrote:
simply plugging unit generators in
to one another, not having to stop and think about how to, for
example, go from a mono oscillator signal to a stereo reverb signal.
I'd like to be able to work more like I work in SuperCollider, writing
higher-level code to create a "signal path",
On Feb 7, 2011, at 6:54 PM, Tom Wiltshire wrote:
On 7 Feb 2011, at 20:54, Andy Farnell wrote:
Do a search on "Yamaha Patent FM". Does that look like a
widespread interpretation that is clear and unambiguous to you?
My argument is simple at this point. Development was stifled.
This is an i
Thanks Chuckk. Will do.
-Morgan
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Chuckk Hubbard
wrote:
> Take a closer look at Csound. This is a very confusing world, and you
> never know who to trust, but Csound is actually released today under
> the LGPL, that L meaning "lesser", and the general idea of this i
Brad,
It seems there are a number of ways to interpret whether an
application which links to a GPL library must be open-sourced as well
(based on wikipedia's expert legal advice). But it's great news to me
that your interpretation is that RT CMix can be used in closed source
applications. Should I
Take a closer look at Csound. This is a very confusing world, and you
never know who to trust, but Csound is actually released today under
the LGPL, that L meaning "lesser", and the general idea of this is
that it's for software libraries more than end-user products, and it
includes provisions for
Hmmm, my understanding of the GPL we adopted was that it only applied to
the source of RTcmix, _not_ to the 'enclosing' app. The way we set up the
iRTcmix
apps, we have a 'manager' class (source provided) that calls into the RTcmix
engine. Any mods you would make to the RTcmix source *proper* wo
Thanks Brad,
Just bought ilooch. Lovely stuff. Unless I'm mistaken though, I'm
required to make my source code publicly available if I embed RT CMix
because it's licensed under the GPL. I swear, I'm not an _entirely_
evil person, but for a few reasons, I don't think it's going to be
possible to op
No, it's usable. I have an app already in the App store:
http://music.columbia.edu/~brad/ilooch/
We have a new release up in the next few days.
brad
On Feb 7, 2011, at 8:25 PM, douglas repetto wrote:
>
> Brad Garton has RTcmix running on the iPhone:
>
> http://music.columb
Thanks Oliver.
Just took a look. Looks like a very nice collection of functions, but
as far as I can tell, it's quite similar to STK in that it will
require me to manage connections between processors i.e. signal flow
myself.
-Morgan
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Oliver Larkin wrote:
> Maybe th
Maybe the icst dsp library (bsd)?
On 8 Feb 2011, at 01:34, Morgan Packard wrote:
> Thanks Douglas.
> Took a look at RTCmix last night. It's GPL licensed. Besides that,
> looks like it might be a good fit for me.
> -Morgan
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:25 PM, douglas repetto
> wrote:
>>
>> Br
Thanks Douglas.
Took a look at RTCmix last night. It's GPL licensed. Besides that,
looks like it might be a good fit for me.
-Morgan
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:25 PM, douglas repetto
wrote:
>
> Brad Garton has RTcmix running on the iPhone:
>
> http://music.columbia.edu/~brad/iRTcmix/
>
>
> Dunno w
Brad Garton has RTcmix running on the iPhone:
http://music.columbia.edu/~brad/iRTcmix/
Dunno what the license is though...
On 2/7/11 8:09 PM, Morgan Packard wrote:
(First post to this list. Sent this a few days ago and it doesn't seem
to have gone through, so trying again.)
Hi There,
I've
(First post to this list. Sent this a few days ago and it doesn't seem
to have gone through, so trying again.)
Hi There,
I've been writing low-level code for my iOS app, Thicket, pretty much
myself, with the exception of a sine oscillator and an envelope
borrowed from STK. I'd like to be able to
On 07/02/2011 20:54, Andy Farnell wrote:
..
In this respect I cite the often-quoted definition of an engineer:
"someone who can build for two bucks what anyone can build for
three".
That's one pretty narrow definition of an engineer, and a little
uncharitable. Sure you can get those kind of eng
Off the top of my head (no guarantee I'm recalling correctly--I'll leave it to
others to fill in details ;-) :
NED licensed Yamaha's patents for the Synclavier.
Casio used a slightly different technique ("phase distortion synthesis").
Yamaha did sue Casio--I think maybe Yamaha eventually won or
On 7 Feb 2011, at 20:54, Andy Farnell wrote:
> Do a search on "Yamaha Patent FM". Does that look like a
> widespread interpretation that is clear and unambiguous to you?
>
> My argument is simple at this point. Development was stifled.
This is an interesting case to try and make. Trying to thin
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 02:29:29 +
Richard Dobson wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 18:53, Andy Farnell wrote:
> > Since there is nothing to divide the line between "this" virtual device
> The DX7 is an automaton. But in principle it can be modeled by a UTM.
> That does not mean there is no dividing line b
17 matches
Mail list logo
