Re: [mb-style] Vinyl: Single vs. EP

2006-03-25 Thread Schika
999 wrote: I added a lot of vinyl releases and often I don't know if it is an EP or a single. What do you think it should be, here are some examples: 1. 7'', TrackA / TrackB 2. 12'', TrackA / TrackB1, TrackB2 3. 12'', 2 tracks on each side I've come across 2 track releases that are

[mb-style] change 'Recording Engineer' to 'Recorded By'

2006-03-25 Thread Simon Reinhardt
Hi, any objections against http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/54 ? I will wait some days and then edit it. :) Simon (Shepard) ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org

Re: [mb-style] change 'Recording Engineer' to 'Recorded By'

2006-03-25 Thread Steve Wyles
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Simon Reinhardt wrote: Hi, any objections against http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/54 ? I will wait some days and then edit it. :) I think that would cause confusion. Frequently the phrase Recorded By is understood to refer to the artist that performed it.

Re: [mb-style] change 'Recording Engineer' to 'Recorded By'

2006-03-25 Thread Simon Reinhardt
Steve Wyles wrote: On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Simon Reinhardt wrote: Hi, any objections against http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/54 ? I will wait some days and then edit it. :) I think that would cause confusion. Frequently the phrase Recorded By is understood to refer to the artist that

Re: [mb-style] Co-ProducerRelationshipType

2006-03-25 Thread azertus
Don Redman schreef: On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:30:45 +0100, Chris Bransden wrote: http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Co-ProducerRelationshipType http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/1173 not sure what else i have to do, so let me know :) think it's a relatively straightforward add. Well, what about

Re: [mb-style] Co-ProducerRelationshipType

2006-03-25 Thread Schika
Don Redman wrote: On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:30:45 +0100, Chris Bransden wrote: http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Co-ProducerRelationshipType http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/1173 not sure what else i have to do, so let me know :) think it's a relatively straightforward add. Well, what

Re: [mb-style] Co-ProducerRelationshipType

2006-03-25 Thread Simon Reinhardt
azertus wrote: Don Redman schreef: On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:30:45 +0100, Chris Bransden wrote: http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Co-ProducerRelationshipType http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/1173 not sure what else i have to do, so let me know :) think it's a relatively straightforward add.

Re: [mb-style] Co-ProducerRelationshipType

2006-03-25 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
I thought the same thing. I'd also like to add another possible attribute: {executive-} Yes, I would like to have executive, too. Btw: I have seen liner notes listing both additional producers and co-producers. Is an executive-something still an artist? --Bogdan Butnaru — [EMAIL

RE: [mb-style] Co-ProducerRelationshipType

2006-03-25 Thread Cristov Russell
Don Redman wrote: On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:30:45 +0100, Chris Bransden wrote: http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Co-ProducerRelationshipType http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/1173 not sure what else i have to do, so let me know :) think it's a relatively straightforward add.

Re: [mb-style] add instrument request: vacuum cleaner

2006-03-25 Thread Brian Gurtler
We really need to get this implemented. I'd suggest to load it onto test after the next server update. Then we should test it and then move it over to the main server. The vacuum cleaner can be added to the test tree, be discussed to death, and then finally make it to the main server,

[mb-style] Don's Musings on the Style Council, Volume 9 (Was: Call for StyleSecretary)

2006-03-25 Thread Don Redman
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:53:22 +0100, Brian Gurtler wrote: LOL yes, give the position to someone that has no spine and will back down at any argument presented to them. you know that i'm only confrontational when confronted.. and i believe most people that don't have thier head in the coulds on

Re: [mb-style] change 'Recording Engineer' to 'Recorded By'

2006-03-25 Thread Don Redman
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 17:41:20 +0100, Steve Wyles wrote: On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Don Redman wrote: On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 16:59:21 +0100, Steve Wyles wrote: Using just Recorded By is ambiguous. It would not just be recorded by but there is a description of the AR type that can be very specific

Re: [mb-style] change 'Recording Engineer' to 'Recorded By'

2006-03-25 Thread Simon Reinhardt
Don Redman wrote: meta-coment from-perspective=sociological Somon: I'd suggest you wait until this discussion has either resolved in a consensus or faded out. Then you make your own decision and request a veto. If you get one, let Robert decide. /meta-comment Somon? Solomon? Am I so wise?

Re: [mb-style] change 'Recording Engineer' to 'Recorded By'

2006-03-25 Thread Chris Bransden
On 25/03/06, Steve Wyles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Don Redman wrote: On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 16:59:21 +0100, Steve Wyles wrote: Using just Recorded By is ambiguous. It would not just be recorded by but there is a description of the AR type that can be very specific

Re: [mb-style] change 'Recording Engineer' to 'Recorded By'

2006-03-25 Thread Chris Bransden
On 26/03/06, Steve Wyles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simplifying is good, but not when it could be misinterpreted. To a native English speaker Recorded By has various meanings in the context of musical works. The situation is far worse for non-native speakers, where they might need to refer

RE: [mb-style] change 'Recording Engineer' to 'Recorded By'

2006-03-25 Thread Cristov Russell
On 26/03/06, Steve Wyles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simplifying is good, but not when it could be misinterpreted. To a native English speaker Recorded By has various meanings in the context of musical works. The situation is far worse for non-native speakers, where they might