I vote for simple "Netherlands", since that seems to be official.
On 4/25/06, Jan van Thiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/23/06, Cristov Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I think 'The'
> > > should be included, to indicate it's plural and because I
> > > like it better.
>
> > Ummm the '
On 4/23/06, Cristov Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think 'The'
> > should be included, to indicate it's plural and because I
> > like it better.
> Ummm the 's' makes it plural not "The". :-)
True :) Anyway, I've decided I really don't care what we decide to
use, as long as it's consiste
I'd go with Netherlands.
From: Nikki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MusicBrainz style
discussion<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MusicBrainz style discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [mb-style] Bootleg locations
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:42:13 +0100
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 09:52:41PM +0200,
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 09:52:41PM +0200, Jan van Thiel wrote:
> Holland is definitely wrong. I usually use 'The Netherlands' and probably
> am responsible for renaming most titles ;) I think 'The' should be
> included, to indicate it's plural and because I like it better.
I do think "the Netherla
In the meantime, a similar thread was started on mb-users... I suggest
moving the discussion there:
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/2006-April/023650.h
tml
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.
Hi,
Nothing is planned yet. But there is a bunch of documentation in
ObjectModel, AlbumRework, ReleaseGrouping etc. to take in account, if
someone wants to edit those documents and consolidate them, that would be a
good start. I'm currently busy cleaning up the mb_server codebase, to make
it ready
Cristov Russell schreef:
Will UPC codes be a part of that as well?
Cristov (wolfsong)
You mean EAN codes, right? :p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
Is there sufficient documentation what should go into the new feature and
what not on the wiki? If you and others could dream up a "development-ready"
Hi!
This is a copy of a post I made to the Users list; I got only an
answer there, perhaps here I'll be more successful:
I just came upon a couple of mod-sprees adding lots of "fan-site" ARs
to a single artist.
Links:
http://musicbrainz.org/mod/search/results.html?artist_id=34&artist_type=3&min
hmmm ... :-S
The legal problems you have brought into discussion do not only exist
in the USA. For example, J.B.O., a German metal band famous for
parodies and satires upon rock classics, current pop songs etc., has
at least 8 songs listed on [1], which might even be already recorded,
but most
Joe wrote:
That is the difference between satire and parody. [...]
The difference can be the difference between fair use and a lawsuit,
apparently (referring to U.S. copyright laws, at least).[...]
This is not a "veto", and if it's chosen to just use "parody" rather than
separate "parody" an
On Monday 24 April 2006 11:02, derGraph wrote:
> Again: Veto?
>
> derGraph
I'm not saying this is actually going to be an issue, but felt it should be
brought up before this is actually implemented in case it might cause issues
later.
That is the difference between satire and parody. Many of t
On 4/24/06, derGraph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again: Veto?
Not from me :)
-- Bogdan Butnaru — [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"I think I am a fallen star, I should wish on myself." – O.
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
h
Bogdan Butnaru wrote:
Considering that the ARs are supposed to be useful for
machine-understanding, we should have tightly-defined semantics for
each relationship. I think if we define "cover" as to include parodies
(as opposed to "a recording of a song (lyrics+music, rearranged) by a
different a
13 matches
Mail list logo
