if you take a look at the very end of
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/UntitledTrackStyle, you'll notice myself
suggesting the same thing, but never got round to creating the wiki
page :) Yeah, i completely agree with this, and I don't think you'll
run into any opposition since UntitledTrackStyle has
I would also include a mention of
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/SplitReleaseTitleStyle as an exception.
Perhaps also it would be wise to say something about untitled singles?
Bit of a grey area as we don't seem to worry much about vinyl (which
is the common offender - eg 7inches in plain sleeves)
I
will be adding this information to the Soundtrack wiki,
to better inform users when soundtrack style applies. It would seem there was
some ambiguity where soundtracks were concerned and I am hoping to clarify that
for everyone.
The
discussion long ago ended with the defining of a
I start this thread because of (1) and to a related thread on the
user's list. I started it here because I think this is a guideline
issue and we need to discuss as such. I encountered similar
situations before.
(1) http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=5258089
The current guidelines say
But that doesn't mean all home-burnt CDs and music .torrents are
uninteresting for MB. We do keep in the database demo tapes that were
thumbs up! thanks for taking this to the mailing list, i agree with
you that this should be discussed in the open.
regards, keschte
I also don't have a clue of the coding needs, but will there be someone that
will take up that part of the coding before we even start on the discussion
of whether not to accept them, we need someone willing to create the code to
make them admissible in my opinion.
The 99 track limit was
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Steve Wyles wrote:
The 99 track limit was removed about 5 months ago, but seems to have been
reintroduced in this release.
removed in http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/changeset/6672
added again in http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/changeset/7584
it needs a bug report raising.
On 26/07/06, Bogdan Butnaru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I start this thread because of (1) and to a related thread on the
user's list. I started it here because I think this is a guideline
issue and we need to discuss as such. I encountered similar
situations before.
(1)
On 7/25/06, Chris Bransden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/07/06, Bogdan Butnaru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I start this thread because of (1) and to a related thread on the
user's list. I started it here because I think this is a guideline
issue and we need to discuss as such. I encountered
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_charts#Methodology_of_its_charts
As you can see, the Billboard system changes, it calculates radio airplay and
music bought at SoundScan-enabled stores. So this is a bit arbitrary (and much
in favor of commercial releases).
As you can see there are many
As long as there are yes and no votes it will go the length of the voting
cycle.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron
Cooper
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 6:20 PM
To: MusicBrainz style discussion
Subject: Re: [mb-style] Billboard's top
On 7/25/06, Beth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The albums that are usually called in Japanese Image Albums and in
Hollywood Music inspired by This is pretty common, they can be
both instrumental (when inspired from the score) and/or pop/rock in
nature, and often contain entirely new material
12 matches
Mail list logo
