On Feb 1, 2008 5:44 AM, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 31-Jan-08, at 11:18 PM, Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> Starting files/directories with a period makes them hidden for Macs,
> too. Ending with a period doesn't seem to be a problem though. I'm
> cool with replacing ... with … (it's
On 31-Jan-08, at 11:18 PM, Brian Schweitzer wrote:
While working on something entirely unrelated, I stumbled onto this,
at Wikipedia. Though Musicbrainz is not a wiki, it would seem that if
they can do it generally, the distinction between hyphen, dash,
en-dash, and em-dash ought to not scare fo
While working on something entirely unrelated, I stumbled onto this,
at Wikipedia. Though Musicbrainz is not a wiki, it would seem that if
they can do it generally, the distinction between hyphen, dash,
en-dash, and em-dash ought to not scare folks who are dealing with the
complexities of CSG... :
> But I am a bit shocked after my CD ripper told me yesterday that a
> simple one and a half minute Mozart solo piano track is called:
>
> "Modulating Prelude to Concerto for Piano in F major transitioning to C
> major, K. Anh C 15.11/(K3) 626aII/I/KV deest Fr 1765a" [1]
>
> This title behooves the
A couple of more points of view from a non-classical editor, who has a
few classical CDs:
Leiv Hellebo wrote:
But I am a bit shocked after my CD ripper told me yesterday that a
simple one and a half minute Mozart solo piano track is called:
"Modulating Prelude to Concerto for Piano in F major
On Jan 31, 2008 5:55 PM, David K. Gasaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We might have a mindset-difference here. I consider what I read right
> > now on my computer _is_ type.
> Heh. Did you miss the second part of my reply?
Nope, I just wasn't sure whether to read the modal verb as
curmudgeonry
On 31-Jan-08, at 4:39 PM, Leiv Hellebo wrote:
Aaron Cooper wrote:
On 31-Jan-08, at 4:10 AM, Leiv Hellebo wrote:
David K. Gasaway wrote:
I've been trying (unsuccessfully?) to frame these discussions in
the perspective of the average user. My views may or may not be
representative, but I'd l
Aaron Cooper wrote:
On 31-Jan-08, at 4:10 AM, Leiv Hellebo wrote:
David K. Gasaway wrote:
I've been trying (unsuccessfully?) to frame these discussions in the
perspective of the average user. My views may or may not be
representative, but I'd like to know that these folks have been given
due
Bogdan Butnaru wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008 11:30 PM, David K. Gasaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's not much point in type without print. Well, okay .. things
may have evolved slightly since computers. ;)
We might have a mindset-difference here. I consider what I read right
now on my compute
On 31-Jan-08, at 4:10 AM, Leiv Hellebo wrote:
David K. Gasaway wrote:
I've been trying (unsuccessfully?) to frame these discussions in
the perspective of the average user. My views may or may not be
representative, but I'd like to know that these folks have been
given due consideration.
On Jan 30, 2008 11:30 PM, David K. Gasaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bogdan Butnaru wrote:
> > The "in print" part is not part of the definition. It's the art and
> > technique of using type (graphic characters).
> There's not much point in type without print. Well, okay .. things may have
> e
David K. Gasaway wrote:
I've been trying (unsuccessfully?) to frame these discussions in the
perspective of the average user. My views may or may not be
representative, but I'd like to know that these folks have been given
due consideration.
Me too. On behalf of both me, and others in my h
12 matches
Mail list logo
