On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phi...@foolip.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 06:43, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
1) In NGS, a Work is 'filed' under an Artist, just as Releases, Tracks,
Release Groups are now.
Since this has nothing to do with
2010/4/4 Lukáš Lalinský lalin...@gmail.com:
Think of works outside of the classical genre, think of them as
songs. Songs usually do have an artist associated with them. For
example, most Beatles songs were composed by Lennon/McCartney, but not
all of them. Would you not find it useful to see a
No debating still ongoing, this proposal, as ammended (removing
Capitalization Standard for future attention separately), is now at RFV.
Without veto, the proposal will pass on 2010-04-06.
Thanks,
Brian
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
No debate still ongoing, this proposal is now at RFV. Without veto, the
proposal will pass on 2010-04-06.
Thanks,
Brian
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
There's been no comments in two days; so this can't get 'stuck' in the
'ongoing
No veto having been heard, and the RFV period having expired, this proposal
has now passed.
Thanks,
Brian
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not an April 1 email. :D
No objection having been heard, and the RFC period having
2010/4/4 Brian Schweitzer brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria
davito...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/4/3 Philip Jägenstedt phi...@foolip.org
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 03:17, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 3,
Just a minor nit, but...
A work has 0 to n composers,
Doesn't a work have to have at least one composer, even if that composer is
unknown, or 'traditional'?
I don't see any reason to give the name Artist to any of these any more
than to any other. Either they are all artists, or none are.
We have almost nothing active in the pipeline at the moment. So, an open
request; please take 5 minutes some time today, and propose just one of the
remaining '5 minute guidelines', so we can get them cleared out? :)
Brian
relationship attribute description:
Bonus Relationship Attribute
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/4/4 Brian Schweitzer brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com
Just a minor nit, but...
A work has 0 to n composers,
Doesn't a work have to have at least one composer, even if that composer
is unknown, or
2010/4/4 Brian Schweitzer brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria
davito...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/4/4 Brian Schweitzer brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com
Just a minor nit, but...
A work has 0 to n composers,
Doesn't a work have to have at
2010/4/4 SwissChris swissch...@gmail.com
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria
davito...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/4/4 Brian Schweitzer brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com
Just a minor nit, but...
A work has 0 to n composers,
Doesn't a work have to have at least one composer,
2010/4/4 Lukáš Lalinský lalin...@gmail.com
2010/4/4 Lukáš Lalinský lalin...@gmail.com:
Think of works outside of the classical genre, think of them as
songs. Songs usually do have an artist associated with them. For
example, most Beatles songs were composed by Lennon/McCartney, but not
2010/4/4 Philip Jägenstedt phi...@foolip.org
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 01:27, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com
wrote:
2010/4/4 Brian Schweitzer brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria
davito...@gmail.com
wrote:
2010/4/4 Brian
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com wrote:
Think of works outside of the classical genre, think of them as
songs. Songs usually do have an artist associated with them. For
example, most Beatles songs were composed by Lennon/McCartney, but not
all of them.
I don't see why everyone's getting all fussy about the name of the
field. The artist field in MusicBrainz has always had a different definition
depending on the context its in.
Perhaps naming the field artist is a bad idea, perhaps, but works are
bringing enough changes as it is. If they are to
2010/4/5 Brian Schweitzer brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com:
2010/4/4 Lukáš Lalinský lalin...@gmail.com
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com
wrote:
Think of works outside of the classical genre, think of them as
songs. Songs usually do have an artist
2010/4/4 Philip Jägenstedt phi...@foolip.org
2010/4/5 Brian Schweitzer brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com:
2010/4/4 Lukáš Lalinský lalin...@gmail.com
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria
davito...@gmail.com
wrote:
Think of works outside of the classical genre, think
2010/4/4 Brian Schweitzer brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com:
That info isn't lost; it's in the recording and performance ARs, where it
belongs.
You've left out the important 'action word' in that X by Y. You're
talking about X (performed by) by Y, but that, to me, is inherently a
Recording
2010/4/4 Lukáš Lalinský lalin...@gmail.com
2010/4/4 Brian Schweitzer brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com:
That info isn't lost; it's in the recording and performance ARs, where it
belongs.
You've left out the important 'action word' in that X by Y. You're
talking about X (performed by) by
2010/4/4 Lukáš Lalinský lalin...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phi...@foolip.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 06:43, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
1) In NGS, a Work is 'filed' under an Artist, just as Releases, Tracks,
Release Groups
20 matches
Mail list logo
