On 11/29/2010 11:35 PM, jacobbrett wrote:
I'm bothered by the typewritten track listings example. What if an artist
intended to mean figure dash, but could only type hyphen, or em-dash, but
could only type two hyphens? I think these cases should be intelligently
translated; I'm not convinced
On 11/30/2010 11:53 AM, Bogdan Butnaru wrote:
2) Use of the hyphen to separate date components is not only
*extremely* common, it is AFAIK dictated by the ISO8601 standard (and
many standards based on it, including XQuery (personal experience),
and now that I think of it pretty much all
Alex Mauer wrote:
On 11/29/2010 12:12 PM, Nikki wrote:
Hmm... I have a couple of issues with it at the moment.
I don't understand what the ditto mark is doing there... It's not a
quotation mark and where exactly would we use it anyway?
Because it’s one of those items for which a neutral
On 11/30/2010 10:32 AM, Alex Mauer wrote:
I agree with that. It’s been brought up by others as well. I’ve
removed that bit in favor of just referencing Artist Intent. I’m still
not happy with the strength of A.I. (It’s way too hard to prove) but
you’re right that giving track listings too
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
Some kind of created the beat for AR could be added, but even though it
would be a good description, it is not the way it is usually credited
anywhere, so it might be confusing.
Putting a flag on the Producer AR that makes it go to work level would be
I can't see how you're going to be able to avoid the AI argument;
artists most often do not perform their own copywriting and cover
artwork.
Was the use of a fixed-point font on the cover the artist's decision?
Their copywriter? Their label? Did they use two hyphens for the master
recording? Did
On 11/30/2010 01:21 PM, Nikki wrote:
The page isn't grouped by the ASCII characters though, it's grouped by
function (double prime isn't under quotation marks, single quotes
aren't under apostrophe...).
The section also says *common* variations and like you, I can't think of
any situation
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 04:30 +0100, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Nikki aei...@gmail.com wrote:
Right now, we have a track-track karaoke version relationship
for them.
In NGS, the relationship is kept between the recordings, and
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Nikki aei...@gmail.com wrote:
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
Some kind of created the beat for AR could be added, but even though it
would be a good description, it is not the way it is usually credited
anywhere, so it might be confusing.
Putting a
Sorry to not have spent a lot of time lately looking at this proposal; I've
been traveling for the holidays.
Other editors can later edit with preferred characters. I know what this
is supposed to mean, but this sentence doesn't really seem to say it all
that well. Perhaps something like Those
Paul C. Bryan-2 wrote:
I can't see how you're going to be able to avoid the AI argument;
artists most often do not perform their own copywriting and cover
artwork.
Was the use of a fixed-point font on the cover the artist's decision?
Their copywriter? Their label? Did they use two
It's been a couple of weeks since [traditional] was reintroduced. I took a
look just now, to see what's going on in there, and it's not impressive.
Ignoring the dupe, there's 5 VA RGs in there at the moment ( see
http://musicbrainz.org/artist/9be7f096-97ec-4615-8957-8d40b5dcbc41.html ).
I did a
.
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 5662 (20101130) __
The message was checked by ESET
13 matches
Mail list logo
