[mb-style] RFV: Live Attribute for Performed Relationship Type

2011-06-15 Thread Michael Wiencek
This is an RFV to add a "live" attribute to the recording<->work "performance of" relationship. The attribute description and one-sentence guideline can be found here: http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Bitmap/Performed_Relationship_Type_Live_Attribute "This indicates that the recording is of a liv

Re: [mb-style] RFC-323: Live Attribute for Performed Relationship Type

2011-06-15 Thread Nikki
It's been more than a week, you can send an RFV now. Nikki Michael Wiencek wrote: > This RFC is to add a "live" attribute to the recording<->work "performance of" > relationship. It should expire on June 15. > > There is a current revision at: > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Bitmap/Performed_

Re: [mb-style] RFC-322: Performed relationship type attributes

2011-06-15 Thread Nikki
jacobbrett wrote: > Should "Too Many Puppies / Master of Puppets" [1] (where a portion of MoP is > played as an interlude in the middle of TMP) be attributed as: > > "Too Many Puppies / Master of Puppets is a performance of Too Many Puppies" > "Too Many Puppies / Master of Puppets is a partial per

Re: [mb-style] Eradicating "(disc #)"

2011-06-15 Thread Nikki
Andii Hughes wrote: > I was wary about suggesting this as I'm not sure if there were > multi-disc vinyl singles > or multi-cassette singles in the past. It seems pretty possible. What I suggested would obviously only apply to CDs. I've never had multi-vinyl or multi-cassette singles so I can't c

Re: [mb-style] Eradicating "(disc #)"

2011-06-15 Thread Simon Austin
On 15/06/2011 17:08, Andii Hughes wrote: > > I was wary about suggesting this as I'm not sure if there were > multi-disc vinyl singles > or multi-cassette singles in the past. It seems pretty possible. In the present even, give or take a few years http://musicbrainz.org/release-group/daaa37ad-5db

Re: [mb-style] Eradicating "(disc #)"

2011-06-15 Thread Andii Hughes
On 15 June 2011 07:36, Nikki wrote: > Simon Austin wrote: >> On 14/06/2011 06:43, Nikki wrote: >>> Simon Austin wrote: As one of the pro-disc N voters of aeons past - isn't this what the release comment field is for now? >>> I was going to say that. I'd personally use "CD 1" and "CD 2" (

Re: [mb-style] IMDB and derivative releases

2011-06-15 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2011/6/15, Johannes Weißl : > Hello Frederic, > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 03:10:38PM +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: >> >> The question is: >> >> a) allow IMDb links only for soundtracks >> >> b) allow IMDb links also for other official albums that are clearly >> >>connected to the IMDb entry

Re: [mb-style] IMDB and derivative releases

2011-06-15 Thread Johannes Weißl
Hello Frederic, On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 03:10:38PM +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > >> The question is: > >> a) allow IMDb links only for soundtracks > >> b) allow IMDb links also for other official albums that are clearly > >>connected to the IMDb entry (e.g. contains songs from the > >> m

Re: [mb-style] IMDB and derivative releases

2011-06-15 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2011/6/15, Frederic Da Vitoria : > 2011/6/15, Johannes Weißl : >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 01:04:46PM +0300, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren >> wrote: >>> Nothing in the IMDB guideline specifies what to do with stuff like >>> this: http://musicbrainz.org/edit/14579702 >>> >>> Should these (official) deriv

Re: [mb-style] IMDB and derivative releases

2011-06-15 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2011/6/15, Johannes Weißl : > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 01:04:46PM +0300, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: >> Nothing in the IMDB guideline specifies what to do with stuff like >> this: http://musicbrainz.org/edit/14579702 >> >> Should these (official) derivative works be linked, or should we keep >>

Re: [mb-style] IMDB and derivative releases

2011-06-15 Thread Johannes Weißl
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 01:04:46PM +0300, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: > Nothing in the IMDB guideline specifies what to do with stuff like > this: http://musicbrainz.org/edit/14579702 > > Should these (official) derivative works be linked, or should we keep > it only for official soundtracks

Re: [mb-style] Normalization of release-level data NGS

2011-06-15 Thread Kuno Woudt
Hello, On 14/06/11 21:34, Simon Austin wrote: > On 14/06/2011 06:39, Kuno Woudt wrote: >> >> I do not object to adding punctuation to separate the main title from >> the subtitle, I just don't think it MUST be a colon in all situations. >> >> If a cover already has punctuation to separate subtitle

Re: [mb-style] Normalization of release-level data NGS

2011-06-15 Thread Kuno Woudt
Hello, On 14/06/11 02:43, Yin Izanami wrote: > I thought there was widespread agreement that Recording titles should > NOT contain artists, and that featured artists should be moved into > Recording artist credits. Not yet. The old featuring artist style is still official until a new proposal

Re: [mb-style] Normalization of release-level data NGS

2011-06-15 Thread Kuno Woudt
Hello, On 15/06/11 03:59, jacobbrett wrote: >> If a cover already has punctuation to separate subtitle from maintitle, >> those characters should be retained at the tracklist/release level. >> >> Or at the very least those characters should be retained if it is >> customary to use that punctuation

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Collaboration Relationship Type update

2011-06-15 Thread Kuno Woudt
On 14/06/11 19:44, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: > Just a (fairly straightforward, I expect) update to limit the > collaboration relationship to cases where we can't use artist credits. > > See > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Reosarevok/Collaboration_Relationship_Type_update > (vs. the curre