On 01/13/2012 08:29 PM, lorenz pressler wrote:
i like it but:
You may enter performance data (e.g. orchestra, conductor, soloist,
and/or performance year) into the release’s disambiguation comment, as a
means of identifying a specific release. For instruments, do not use the
perfomer's role
It's been more than 48 hours so this has passed.
Nikki
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89tude (needed for, say, half the
works of Chopin, for example)
Since most people prefer étude and monxton doesn't strongly oppose it,
I'm RFVing.
For those who weren't on IRC when we were talking about it,
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Hawke/Proposal/CSG-mod#Keys has been
updated to stop telling people to use the wrong capitalisation for
things like German and Spanish.
I noticed you changed the ASCII quotes to English-style quotes,
On 01/16/2012 11:09 AM, Alex Mauer wrote:
On 01/13/2012 08:29 PM, lorenz pressler wrote:
i like it but:
You may enter performance data (e.g. orchestra, conductor, soloist,
and/or performance year) into the release’s disambiguation comment, as a
means of identifying a specific release. For
-Original Message-
From: musicbrainz-style-boun...@lists.musicbrainz.org
[mailto:musicbrainz-style-boun...@lists.musicbrainz.org] On
Behalf Of Alex Mauer
Sent: January-16-12 12:09 PM
To: musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
Subject: Re: [mb-style] RFC-347: CSG update for NGS
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Brant Gibbard bgibb...@ca.inter.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: musicbrainz-style-boun...@lists.musicbrainz.org
[mailto:musicbrainz-style-boun...@lists.musicbrainz.org] On
Behalf Of Alex Mauer
Sent: January-16-12 12:09 PM
To:
Disambiguation comments *are* shown in searches:
http://test.musicbrainz.org/search?query=testtype=release_gro
uplimit=25advanced=1direct=1
(guess which 4 I just added!)
I'm using a direct search because they haven't been indexed
yet, but the display is the same for the indexed search
On 01/16/2012 03:49 PM, Brant Gibbard wrote:
[snipped]
Is the intention here that the information should be entered in the
disambiguation field INSTEAD of in the title, or in addition to it?
Instead. If there is a situation where the disambiguation comments need
to show up and they don’t,
On 1/12/2012 3:05 PM, Alex Mauer wrote:
This is RFC-347, expiring 2012-01-19.
It updates the CSG for the NGS schema, without trying to do anything too
ambitious (cf. CSGv2).
Further discussion has brought forth the point that the Works definition
in CSG-mod was rather tautological
