Chad Wilson a écrit :
>
> We don't want people's work (given there's so few that do it) to be lost
> by making changes to either wiki which may be lost.
>
Current work on MediaWiki is only for the proof-of-concept.
It's assumed that it will be lost with the final migration, excepted for
manual
Jim DeLaHunt a écrit :
> Philip Jägenstedt-3 wrote:
>
>> Ah, MediaWiki is quite refreshing, I like it
>>
>>
>
> Hear, hear! +1!
>
> I like what I see at the prototype pages.
>
> We should make a place to list issues with the migration (he said, presuming
> that it will in fact go ahead
Lukáš Lalinský a écrit :
> part of the previous discussion was migrating the wiki to either
> MoinMoin 1.6 or MediaWiki. A MediaWiki instance is now set up on
> http://mediawiki.musicbrainz.org/ with the latest version of our current
> wiki (no history). Can you please play with it, try to use some
Lukáš Lalinský a écrit :
> Dňa Št, 2008-07-31 o 12:20 +0200, "Aurélien.mino" napísal:
>
>> Chad Wilson a écrit :
>>
>>> Do we understand why Moin was chosen in the first place above MediaWiki?
>>> Do we have an idea of whether it will fix
Robert Kaye a écrit :
> If MediaWiki can be used for transclusion, I'm all for the switch.
>
>
Transclusion can probably be achieved with MediaWiki as well:
it supports extensions, and here's one allowing to export a wiki page as
PDF: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Pdf_Export,
which ma
Chad Wilson a écrit :
> Do we understand why Moin was chosen in the first place above MediaWiki?
> Do we have an idea of whether it will fix some of the transclusion
> display problems with Moin pages?
>
> I am concerned that to do a migration while the data is in a bad state
> may detract from
Chad Wilson a écrit :
> The issue at the moment is that the problem is too big. I think we need a
> streamlined process for a period of time to try and clean out the bulk of the
> old/outdated crud so that the time can gradually be spent more on
> maintenance/improving/reviewing rather than rest
